Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: daya shanker misra · Page 1 of about 14 results (0.049 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 03 1984

Ramesh Chandra Agrawal Vs. Adhikchhak Janpad Karagar and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-03-1984

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1984CriLJ1091

Advocate for Appellant : Sri. Daya Shanker Misra

H.N. Seth, J.1. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution Ramesh Chandra Agarwal questioned the validity of his detention under the provisions of Section 3(1) of the prevention of Black marketing and Maintenance of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 17 1998

Tahir HusaIn Ansari and Another Vs. U.P. Rajya and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-17-1998

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 21

Reported in : 1999(1)AWC378

Advocate for Appellant : Daya Shanker Mishra, Adv.

Binod Kumar Roy and R.K. Mahajan, JJ.1. The prayer of the two petitioners who claim themselves to be husband and wife respectively, issubstantially to issue a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 13 1994

Jokhu Lal Vs. Superintendent, Central Jail and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-13-1994

Subject : ConstitutionCivil

Acts : National Security Act, 1980 - Sections 2, 3(2), 3(3), 3(5), 8, 8(1), 12(1) and 14; Uttar Pradesh Electric Wire and Transformer (Prevention and Punishment) Act, 1976 - Sections 3 and 5; Unlawful Possession of Railway Property Act - Sections 3; Prevention of Black Marketing and Maintenance of Supplies of Essential Commodities Act, 1980; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 41, 379 and 411; Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act - Sections 11; Constitution of India - Article 22 and 22(5)

Reported in : 1994CriLJ3466

Advocate for Appellant : D.S. Misra, Adv.

1. This Habeas Corpus Petition has been filed by the Jokhu Lal who is under detention in pursuance of an order dated 14-9-1993 passed under Section 3(2) of National Security Act (hereinafter referred to as the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 06 2000

Syed Mohd. Nadeem Vs. Superintendent, District Jail and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-06-2000

Subject : Criminal

Acts : National Security Act, 1980 - Sections 3, 3(1), 3(2), 3(3), 5A, 5A(2) and 8; Prevention of Black-marketing and Maintenance of Supplies of Essential Commodities Act, 1980 - Sections 3(1); National Security (Second Amendment) Act, 1984; Constitution of India - Articles 22(5) and 226

Reported in : 2000CriLJ3777

Advocate for Appellant : Daya Shankar Mishra, Adv.

S.R. Singh, J.1. Petitioner-Syed Mohd. Nadeem, who is incarcerated in District Jail Agra, Having been detained under the National Security Act, 1980 (In short the ('Act') has invoked the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 22 2000

Ram Lal Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-22-2000

Subject : Criminal

Acts : National Security Act, 1980 - Sections 3, 3(2), 3(3) and 14; Criminal Law (Amendment) Act - Sections 7; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25(4); Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Preservation of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - Sections 3; Preventive Detention Act, 1950; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 147, 148, 149, 302, 307, 504 and 506

Reported in : 2000CriLJ4147

Advocate for Appellant : R.C. Kandpal, ;R.P. Kashyap, ;Daya Shanker Misra and ;J.G. Upadhyay, Advs.

S.R. Singh, J.1. Challenge in this group of writ petitions is to the validity of detention pursuant to the order dated 26-6-1999 passed separately in each case, though on identical grounds, under Sub-section (2) read with...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 25 2011

Laxmi NaraIn Pandey Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-25-2011

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 406, 407

Advocate for Appellant : Kailash Prakash Pathak; Chandra Kesh Misra; Daya Shanker Misra, Advs

1. Heard Mr. D.S. Misra assisted by Mr. Kailash Prakash Pathak for the applicant, Mr. Vijai Shanker Misra assisted by Mr. Rahul Misra for the respondents no.2 and 3 and Mr. N.D. Rai learned AGA for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 04 1989

Uma Shanker Verma Vs. Superintendent, Central Jail and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-04-1989

Subject : CriminalCustoms

Acts : Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - Sections 3(1) and 3(2); ;Customs Act - Sections 104 and 135; Constitution of India - Articles 22, 22(5), 22(6) and 226

Reported in : 1990CriLJ2114

Advocate for Appellant : Daya Shanker Misra, Adv.

S. Saghir Ahmad, J.1. The petitioner by means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution has challenged the order dated 24trh February, 1989 passed by the Central Government under Section 3(1) of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 12 1998

Sarmister Vs. Superintendent, District Jail and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-12-1998

Subject : Criminal

Acts : National Security Act, 1980 - Sections 3, 3(2), 3(3), 3(5) and 14; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 21; Constitution of India - Articles 22 and 226

Reported in : 1999CriLJ305

Advocate for Appellant : Daya Shanker Misra, Adv.

D.P. Mohapatra, C.J. 1. In this petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner Sarmister has prayed, inter alia, for a writ in the nature of habeas corpus directing the respondents to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 13 1998

Ram Adhar and ors. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-13-1998

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Minor Minerals (Concession) Rules - Rules 9, 9A and 19; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 383 and 392; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1999CriLJ285

Advocate for Appellant : Daya Shanker Misra, Adv.

K.D. Shahi, J.1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution has been filed praying that the F.I.R. of Case Crime No. 76 of 1988 be quashed and the loader machines which have been seized may...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 12 1992

Mohammad Daood Qureshi (In Jail) Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-12-1992

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 392, 394, 394(2) and 397; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 267, 354, 354(1), 374, 374(1), 374(2), 378 and 397(1)

Reported in : 1993CriLJ1437

Advocate for Appellant : Daya Shanker Misra, Adv.

ORDERSurya Prasad, J.1. This is a criminal revision against the judgment and order dated 12-2-92 passed by the learned Special Judge, Moradabad in Session Trial No. 748-A/84 State v. Mohammad Daood under Sections 394/397, I.P.C. Police...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial