Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: dalip singh and · Page 1 of about 2,134 results (0.205 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 13 1994

Jashubha Bharatsinh Gohil and ors. Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-13-1994

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 354(3)

Reported in : 1994(2)Crimes92(SC); (1994)2GLR1392; JT1994(3)SC250; 1994(2)SCALE534; (1994)4SCC353; [1994]3SCR471

Advocate for Appellant : T.U. Mehta, Sr. Adv.,; N.N. Keshwani,; Ashok D. Shah and;

A.S. Anand, J. 1. Twelve persons namely, Bharatsinh Patubha Gohil, Dhruvansinh Bharatsinh Gohil. Antruddsinh Bharatsinh Gohil, Jodha Khoda Rabari, Bhikhubha Shivubha Gohil, Bhupatsinh Bahadursinh Gohil, Kuvarsinh Ajitsinh Gohil, Nirubha, Ajitsinh, Baldevsinh Alias Bablubha Sajubha Gohil, Jashubha...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 01 1996

Maharaj Krishan Vs. Iqbal Krishan

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-01-1996

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 23, Rule 3

Reported in : 1996IAD(Delhi)743; 61(1996)DLT693; 1996(36)DRJ502

Advocate for Appellant : S. Vaidyalingam and; Dalip Singh, Advs

Manmohan Sarin, J.(1) The defendant has moved the present application under Order Xxiii Rule 3 read with Section 151 Cpc, for recording adjustment of the suit vide a Writing/Memorandum of Understanding dated 3-11-1993. Defendant prays that...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 11 2008

State of Maharashtra Vs. Haresh Mohandas Rajput

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-11-2008

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302 and 376; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313

Reported in : (2008)110BOMLR373

Advocate for Appellant : Sharmila Kaushik, Adv.

S. Radhakrishnan, J.1. By filing the above Appeal No.1020 of 2001 the Appellant-State is seeking the enhancement of sentence awarded to the Respondent-original accused by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune. Whereas, by filing the Appeal No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 13 1964

Bodhan Vs. Sri Bhundal Singh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-13-1964

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9 and 100; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115 and 116

Reported in : AIR1965All309

Advocate for Appellant : Mohanji Varma, Adv.

Gangeshwar Prasad, J.1. These two connected second appeals arise out of two connected suits (suits NOS. 3 and 4 of 1951) filed in the civil court for possession over certain plots of agricultural land. Bhundal Singh...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 01 2005

Amrik Singh and ors. Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-01-2005

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34 and 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313

Reported in : 2005CriLJ2707

Advocate for Appellant : Baldev Singh, Sr. Counsel and; Arshwinder Singh, Adv.

V.K. Bali, J.1. Whether dying declaration made by Ram Parkash before the Doctor and Executive Magistrate, which was recorded and the oral dying declaration made by him before Vijay Kumar, PW-6, and Krishan Lal, PW-10, in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 15 2007

Abhey Ram Vs. Miyan Singh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-15-2007

Subject : Property

Reported in : (2007)4PLR243

Vinod K. Sharma, J.1. The present Regular Second Appeal has been filed against the judgments and decrees by the learned Court below vide which the suit for specific performance filed by the plaintiff-respondent Miyan Singh was...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 11 2008

Wel Intertrade Private Limited (Formerly Wel Intertrade Limited) and a ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-11-2008

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 139, 142(1), 143(2), 143(3), 147, 148 and 149(1)

Reported in : [2009]308ITR22(Delhi); [2009]178TAXMAN27(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : C.S. Aggarwal, Sr. Adv. and; Prakash Kumar, Adv

Badar Durrez Ahmed, J.1. Rule. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the writ petition is taken up for disposal straightaway.2. In this writ petition, the petitioner is impugning the notice dated 28.03.2007 under...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 20 1996

Sukhwant Singh Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-20-1996

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 20(1); Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 98; Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 48

Reported in : 1996IIIAD(Delhi)77; 1996CriLJ4079; 1996(38)DRJ299

Advocate for Appellant : Dinesh Mathur,; R.M. Tiwari and; Dalip Singh, Advs

Usha Mehra, J. (1) This petitioner was charged with three offences punishable under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (hereinafter called the 'Act of 1988'). The first charge against him is that he...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 28 2001

Madho Singh and Etc. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Feb-28-2001

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 27, 114 and 134; Bombay Public Trusts Act - Sections 35; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 165-A, 201, 302, 323, 341 and 379; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161, 162, 313, 340(3) and 342; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 100

Reported in : 2001CriLJ2159

Advocate for Appellant : Dalip Singh and; K.K. Mehrish, Advs.

Arun Madan, J.1. These two criminal appeals have been preferred by appellants Nathu Singh and Madho Singh) challenging the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge No. 1 Jaipur City who convicted each of them and sentenced...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 15 1953

State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Lalchand Shahi

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-15-1953

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Section 34

Reported in : AIR1953HP75

Advocate for Appellant : Dalip Singh, Adv.

Chowdhry, J.C.1. This is a defendant's appeal under Section 39(1)(v), Arbitration Act (10 of 1940) from an order of the Senior Subordinate Judge of Sirmur dated 24-7-1952 refusing to stay legal proceedings on an application to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial