Advanced Search Results
Hycinth Mary Vs. The Commercial Tax officer (Lt)
Kerala
Sep-08-2015
Service Tax
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR TUESDAY,THE8H DAY OF SEPTEMBER201517TH BHADRA, 1937 WP(C).No. 25086 of 2015 (L) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- HYCINTH MARY, PROPRIETRIX, LAKE SURYA HOUSE BOAT,ARATTUKULAM,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHycinth Mary Vs. The Commercial Tax officer (Lt)
Kerala
Sep-08-2015
Service Tax
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR TUESDAY,THE8H DAY OF SEPTEMBER201517TH BHADRA, 1937 WP(C).No. 25086 of 2015 (L) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- HYCINTH MARY, PROPRIETRIX, LAKE SURYA HOUSE BOAT,ARATTUKULAM,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHycinth Mary Vs. The Commercial Tax officer (Lt)
Kerala
Sep-08-2015
Service Tax
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR TUESDAY,THE8H DAY OF SEPTEMBER201517TH BHADRA, 1937 WP(C).No. 25086 of 2015 (L) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- HYCINTH MARY, PROPRIETRIX, LAKE SURYA HOUSE BOAT,ARATTUKULAM,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Hycinth Mary Vs. The Commercial Tax officer (Lt)
Kerala
Sep-08-2015
Service Tax
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR TUESDAY,THE8H DAY OF SEPTEMBER201517TH BHADRA, 1937 WP(C).No. 25086 of 2015 (L) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- HYCINTH MARY, PROPRIETRIX, LAKE SURYA HOUSE BOAT,ARATTUKULAM,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGeetha G vs the State of Kerala
Kerala
Feb-26-2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED NIAS C.P. MONDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024 / 7TH PHALGUNA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 25839 OF 2022 PETITIONER: GEETHA G, AGED 56 YEARS...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Powertech Engineers, Vennala P.O, Ernakulam vs the Assistant Comm ...
Kerala
Feb-28-2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAVI TUESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2023 / 9TH PHALGUNA, 1944 PETITIONER: M/S. POWERTECH ENGINEERS, CC 33/1185A, CHALIKAVATTOM, VENNALA P.O, ERNAKULAM, PIN -...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBharat Gold Mines Limited Vs. Dhanalakshmi
Karnataka
Aug-08-2001
Labour and Industrial
Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 2(1), 3, 3(1), 4(1), 4A(1), 11 and 11(1)
2003ACJ39; [2002(93)FLR1187]; ILR2002KAR2164; 2002(2)KarLJ131
A.S. Bopanna, Adv.
B.K. Sangalad, J.1. This appeal is against the judgment dated 23-12-1999 passed in No. WCA.KGF.FC. 15/90 by the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation, Kolar District, allowing the claim petition for compensation.2. The respondent filed an application dated...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskD. Srinivas Vs. Sbi Life Insurance Co. Ltd
Supreme Court of India
Feb-16-2018
Education
Anu Gupta
1 NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.2216 OF2018[Arising out of SLP (C) No.14021 of 2017]. D. SRINIVAS … APPELLANT VERSUS SBI LIFE INSURANCE CO. LTD.AND ORS. … RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Divisional Manager, the New India Ass. Co. Ltd. Vs. Sasikumar and ...
Chennai
Mar-18-2009
Motor Vehicles
Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 2(15B), 19, 51 and 52A; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 279 and 338
(2009)5MLJ268
D. Venugopal and ;V. Ramakrishnan, Advs.
M. Venugopal, J.1. The appellant/New India Assurance Company Limited, Pondicherry has preferred this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, dis-satisfied with the award dated 12/9/2003 passed in M.C.O.P. No. 339 of 2001 by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal -...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKrishna Reddy Vs. Management of K.S.R.T.C. and ors.
Karnataka
Sep-08-1992
Labour and Industrial
K.S.R.T.C. Servants (Conduct and Discipline) Regulations, 1971 - Regulation 35(1)
ILR1992KAR3265; (1993)IILLJ1048Kant
D. Venugopal, Adv.
K.A. Swami, A.C.J.1. At the stage of admission the respondents have put in appearance through a counsel. Therefore, the appeal is admitted and it is heard for final disposal as it lies in a very narrow...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »