Advanced Search Results

Prem Kumari and anr. Vs. U.T. Admn., Chandigarh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Reported in : 1994Supp(2)SCC401

K. Ramaswamy and; N.P. Singh, JJ.1. The petitioners are admittedly daughters-in-law of the retired employees. The U.T., Chandigarh had introduced the scheme for allotment of out of turn accommodation to the wife/husband, son, unmarried daughter of...

State of U.P. and ors. Vs. Gayatri Devi Pandey (Smt)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Regularisation of Ad Hoc Appointments (on Posts within the Purview of the Public Service Commission) Rules, 1979 - Rules 4, 5 and 6

Reported in : 1996VIIAD(SC)304; [1996(74)FLR2409]; JT1996(7)SC668; 1996(6)SCALE308; (1996)6SCC111; [1996]Supp4SCR642; 1996(3)SLJ108(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : D.V. Sehgal, Senior Adv.,; Monika Gosain and; R.B. Misra,

ORDER1. We have heard learned Counsel on both sides.2. Initially, the special leave petition was filed against an order of the learned Single Judge made on September 23, 1991 in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 20281...

improvement Trust, Moga Vs. Manchanda Soap Works and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Acts : Punjab Town Improvement Act, 1922 - Sections 26, 27, 36, 38, 40(3), 41(1), 78 and 79

Reported in : 1996IVAD(SC)397; AIR1996SC2019; JT1996(5)SC20; (1996)114PLR111; 1996(4)SCALE171; (1996)8SCC686; [1996]Supp1SCR402

Advocate for Appellant : D.V. Sehgal,; A.B. Rohtagi,; Naresh Bakshi,;

1. This appeal by special leave arises from the Judgment of a Division Bench of the Punjab & Haryana High Court made on October 3, 1988 in CWP No. 1809 of 1986. The fact fairly are...

Hans Raj and ors. Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Reported in : 1994(5)SCALE216; 1995Supp(1)SCC405; 1995(1)LC150(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. D.V. Sehgal

Paripoornan J.1. These are connected appeals. The appellants in both the appeals are the same persons. But the respondents are different in the two different suits and appeals. Civil Appeal No. 808/92 is filed against the...

Amrik Rai Vs. Sat Pal Sood and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Family

Acts : Guardians and Wards Act - Sections 17, 19 and 25; Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 - Sections 6 and 13; Divorce Act

Reported in : AIR1983P& H301

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. D. V. Sehgal

1. The petitioner father has been disentitled to the custody of his two minor children by the trial Court. He appeals. The children are now with their maternal grand-parents, the respondents.2. Smt. Rani, wife of the...

Balbir Singh Vs. Hari Ram

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973 - Sections 12 and 13(3); East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 - Sections 12; Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947

Reported in : AIR1983P& H132

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. D. V. Sehgal

K.S. Tiwana, J. 1. The question requiring determination in this civil revision is whether a tenant can prospectus an application under Section 12 of the Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act (Haryana Act No....

Amrik Singh Vs. the State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1983CriLJ709

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. D. V. Sehgal, Mr. Sehgal

S.S. Sandhawalia, C.J.1. The true import of the freshly added Clause (m) of Section 2(ia) (vide Act 34 of 1976), of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, is the somewhat meaningful question which had necessitated...

Shri Dharamvir and M.L. Sarwan Vs. Amar Singh and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Election

Acts : Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 8A, 64A, 100(1), 116A, 123(8) and 135A; Representation of the People (Amended) Act, 1975

Reported in : AIR1996SC2314; JT1996(2)SC10; 1996(1)SCALE697; (1996)3SCC158; [1996]2SCR156

Advocate for Appellant : D.V. Sehgal,; U.R. Lalit,; R.K. Khanna,;

ORDERK.S. Paripoornan, J.1. These are connected cases. The main appeal is C.A. No. 2886 of 1989. The Civil Appeals and the Special Leave Petition are preferred against the Judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court,...

Harnam Singh Vs. Surjit Singh

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 - Sections 13 and 13(3); Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 14-A and 14(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 11 and 17 - Order 2, Rule 2; Delhi-Ajmer Marwar Rent Control Act, 1947 - Sections 9

Reported in : AIR1984P& H126

S.S. Sandhawalla, C.J.1. Is the requirement of personal use and occupation by the landlord under sub-section (3)(a)(i) a distinct and separate cause of action from that of non-payment of rent under sub-sec (2)(i) for the eviction...

Surta Singh Vs. Pritam Singh

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 - Sections 2, 8, 8(1) and 8(2); Indian Limitation Act, 1961 - Schedule - Article 60; Guardianship and Wards Act, 1890 - Sections 29; Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Article 44; Indian Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 60; Indian Contract Act - Sections 2; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 32, Rule 7

Reported in : AIR1983P& H114

S.S. Sandhawalia, C.J.1. Whether a transfer of immovable property by a natural guardian in contravention of Section 8 (1) and (2) of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 can be challenged by way of a...