Advanced Search Results

N.K. Chauhan and ors. Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 162, 309

Reported in : AIR1977SC251; 1977LabIC38; (1977)1SCC308; [1977]1SCR1037

Advocate for Appellant : Sri. D.V. Patel, Shri. Parekh

V.R. KRISHNA IYER, J.1. This is a typical “service” appeal, by special leave, which prompts the topical question : Is it wiser national policy to process disputes regarding seniority, promotion, termination and allied matters affecting the...

Sayed Mohomed Baquir El-edroos (Dead) by Lrss. Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Acts : Bombay Personal Inams Abolition Act, 1952 - Sections 2(1); Bombay Personal Inams Abolition (Amendment) Act, 1969; Bombay Land Revenue Code, 1879 - Sections 53, 203 and 212

Reported in : AIR1981SC2016; (1982)1GLR42(SC); 1981(3)SCALE1555; (1981)4SCC383; [1982]1SCR882; 1981(13)LC826(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : D.V. Patel,; R. Shroff,; Gopal Subramaniam and;D.P. Mohanty

R.B. Misra, J.1. The present appeal by special leave is directed against the Full Bench decision of the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad dated 23rd of September, 1976. The sole question for consideration in this...

Raman Hosiery Factory, Delhi and ors. Vs. J.K. Synthetics Ltd. and ors ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Contract

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 38 - Order 39, Rule 2; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 38; Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 - Sections 37; Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1956 - Sections 20

Reported in : AIR1974Delhi207; [1975]45CompCas374(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. D. V. Patel

1. The plaintiffs are the three partners and their partnership firm who claim that they are carrying on the business of manufacture and sale of nylon hosiery goods in Delhi. Defendants 1 to 4 are manufacturers...

Shaikh Yakub Ibrahim Sathia Vs. Mahomadali Haiderali Vohra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : LimitaionContract

Reported in : (1957)59BOMLR870

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. D.V. Patel, Mr. Gambhirwala

S.T. Desai, J.1. This second appeal raises a short but interesting question of law. The appellant who was the original defendant No. 1 and his two sons who were defendants Nos. 2 and 3 to the...

Bhagwan Dass Sehgal Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 191(1); Punjab State Legislature (Prevention of Disqualification) Act, 1952 - Sections 2; Haryana State Legislature (Prevention of Disqualification) (Amendment) Act, 1969

Reported in : AIR1974SC2355; (1975)1SCC249; [1975]2SCR580; 1974(6)LC775(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : D.V. Patel,; S.S. Khanduja and; S.K. Jain, Advs

R.S. Sarkaria, J.1. The common question that arises for determination in these appeals is ; Whether Clause (i) in Section 2 of the Punjab State Legislature (Prevention of Disqualification) Act 7 of 1952 (hereinafter referred to...

Madras Rubber Factory Ltd. Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Indian Tariff Act, 1934; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 18, 26, 27, 27(1), 128(1) and 131; Central Excises Act, 1944

Reported in : AIR1976SC638; 1985(5)LC2298(SC); 1983(13)ELT1579(SC); (1976)2SCC255; [1976]2SCR864; 1976(8)LC91(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : D.V.Patel and; K.R. Nambiyar, Advs

N.L. Untwalia, J.1. The appellant company in these appeals by special leave is a manufacturer of rubber tyres and tubes. It imports, several raw-materials including Pyratex Vinyl Pyridine Latex used in the manufacture of rubber tyres...

M/S. Madras Rubber Factory Ltd. Vs. the Union of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1976)5CTR(SC)0208B

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. D. V. Patel

Untwalia, J. - The appellant company in these appeals by special leave is manufacturer of rubber tyres and tubes. It imports several raw materials including Pyratex Vinyl Pyridine Latex used in the manufacture of rubber tyres...

Bagal Kot Cement Co. Vs. State of Mysore.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1976)5CTR(SC)0106B

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. D. V. Patel

Untwalia, J. - In this appeal by special leave the question for determination is whether the appellant company is a dealer within the meaning of Section 2 (b) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 hereinafter...

Bagal Kot Cement Co. Vs. State of Mysore

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 2, 6 and 9(2); Mysore Sales Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 2(k) and 23; Cement Control Orders, 1958; Cement Control (Amendment) Orders, 1961; Central Control Order; Sales Tax Rules

Reported in : AIR1976SC357; (1976)1SCC336; [1976]2SCR852; [1976]37STC73(SC); 1976(8)LC80(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : D.V. Patel,; Vineer Kumar and; B.P.Singh, Advs

N.L. Untwalia, J.1. In this appeal by special leave the question for determination is whether the appellant company is a dealer within the meaning of Section 2(b) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956-hereinafter referred to...

Bhailalbhai Tulsidas Patel Vs. Shankerbhai Kilabhai Patel and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : TenancyLimitation

Acts : Tenancy Law; Bombay Tenancy Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 - Sections 14, 14(1), 27(1) and 29(2); Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : AIR1959Bom16; (1957)59BOMLR1081; ILR1958Bom273

Advocate for Appellant : D.V. Patel, Adv.

Dixit, J. 1. The applicant is the owner of five lands situate in a village, called Sarsa in the Anand Taluka of the Kaira District. Opponent No. 1 to the petition was a tenant of these...