Advanced Search Results
Bhagwan Dass Sehgal Vs. State of Haryana and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Nov-05-1974
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 191(1); Punjab State Legislature (Prevention of Disqualification) Act, 1952 - Sections 2; Haryana State Legislature (Prevention of Disqualification) (Amendment) Act, 1969
AIR1974SC2355; (1975)1SCC249; [1975]2SCR580; 1974(6)LC775(SC)
D.V. Patel,; S.S. Khanduja and; S.K. Jain, Advs
R.S. Sarkaria, J.1. The common question that arises for determination in these appeals is ; Whether Clause (i) in Section 2 of the Punjab State Legislature (Prevention of Disqualification) Act 7 of 1952 (hereinafter referred to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSayed Mohomed Baquir El-edroos (Dead) by Lrss. Vs. State of Gujarat
Supreme Court of India
Oct-01-1981
Property
Bombay Personal Inams Abolition Act, 1952 - Sections 2(1); Bombay Personal Inams Abolition (Amendment) Act, 1969; Bombay Land Revenue Code, 1879 - Sections 53, 203 and 212
AIR1981SC2016; (1982)1GLR42(SC); 1981(3)SCALE1555; (1981)4SCC383; [1982]1SCR882; 1981(13)LC826(SC)
D.V. Patel,; R. Shroff,; Gopal Subramaniam and;D.P. Mohanty
R.B. Misra, J.1. The present appeal by special leave is directed against the Full Bench decision of the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad dated 23rd of September, 1976. The sole question for consideration in this...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMadras Rubber Factory Ltd. Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Dec-03-1975
Intellectual Property Rights
Indian Tariff Act, 1934; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 18, 26, 27, 27(1), 128(1) and 131; Central Excises Act, 1944
AIR1976SC638; 1985(5)LC2298(SC); 1983(13)ELT1579(SC); (1976)2SCC255; [1976]2SCR864; 1976(8)LC91(SC)
D.V.Patel and; K.R. Nambiyar, Advs
N.L. Untwalia, J.1. The appellant company in these appeals by special leave is a manufacturer of rubber tyres and tubes. It imports, several raw-materials including Pyratex Vinyl Pyridine Latex used in the manufacture of rubber tyres...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Bagal Kot Cement Co. Vs. State of Mysore
Supreme Court of India
Nov-27-1975
Sales Tax
Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 2, 6 and 9(2); Mysore Sales Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 2(k) and 23; Cement Control Orders, 1958; Cement Control (Amendment) Orders, 1961; Central Control Order; Sales Tax Rules
AIR1976SC357; (1976)1SCC336; [1976]2SCR852; [1976]37STC73(SC); 1976(8)LC80(SC)
D.V. Patel,; Vineer Kumar and; B.P.Singh, Advs
N.L. Untwalia, J.1. In this appeal by special leave the question for determination is whether the appellant company is a dealer within the meaning of Section 2(b) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956-hereinafter referred to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBhailalbhai Tulsidas Patel Vs. Shankerbhai Kilabhai Patel and ors.
Mumbai
Jul-30-1957
TenancyLimitation
Tenancy Law; Bombay Tenancy Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 - Sections 14, 14(1), 27(1) and 29(2); Constitution of India - Article 227
AIR1959Bom16; (1957)59BOMLR1081; ILR1958Bom273
D.V. Patel, Adv.
Dixit, J. 1. The applicant is the owner of five lands situate in a village, called Sarsa in the Anand Taluka of the Kaira District. Opponent No. 1 to the petition was a tenant of these...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Bombay Panjrapole, Bhuleshwar Vs. the Workmen and anr.
Supreme Court of India
Aug-16-1971
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 2
AIR1971SC2422; [1972(24)FLR87]; 1971LabIC1401; (1971)IILLJ393SC; (1971)3SCC349; [1972]1SCR202
D.V. Patel and; I.N. Shroff, Advs
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 1331 of 1966.Appeal by special leave from the order dated January 20, 1966 of the Bombay High Court in Special Civil Application No. 54 of 1966.D. V. Patel and L...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAvinash Kaur Vs. Beli Ram
Delhi
Sep-23-1970
Tenancy
Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 14(1)
ILR1970Delhi651
R.M. Lal,; Arun Mohan,; D.V. Patel and ;
H.R. Khanna, C.J. (1) The short question, which has been referred to the Division Bench, is whether a tenant is liable to be ejected from any premises under clause (h) of the proviso to sub-section (1)...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskN.K. Chauhan and ors. Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Nov-01-1976
Service
Constitution of India - Articles 162, 309
AIR1977SC251; 1977LabIC38; (1977)1SCC308; [1977]1SCR1037
Sri. D.V. Patel, Shri. Parekh
V.R. KRISHNA IYER, J.1. This is a typical “service” appeal, by special leave, which prompts the topical question : Is it wiser national policy to process disputes regarding seniority, promotion, termination and allied matters affecting the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBanwarilal and Sons Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors.
Delhi
Apr-17-1972
Property
Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5
AIR1973Delhi24; 8(1972)DLT285
G.S. Vohra,; P.B. Lal and; V.P. Kohli, Advs
V.S. Deshpande, J.(1) The appellant's building was requisitioned by the Government under section 3 of the Requisitioning and Acquisition of Immovable Property Act, 1952 and a sum of Rs. 3212.50 was offered to the appellant as...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskWealth-tax Officer Vs. Ramanlal V. Jariwala (Huf)
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad
Aug-03-1984
Direct Taxation
(1985)11ITD331(Ahd.)
1. This is a classic example of filing appeals by the revenue without proper application of mind. The only point involved in these appeals, as well as cross-objections, pertains to the imposition of penalty under Section...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »