Advanced Search Results
R. Vs. Pandit V. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax
Mumbai
Aug-04-1998
Direct Taxation
(1999)64TTJ(Mumbai)529
D. V. Junnarkar, for the Appellant Rajkumar, for the Respondent.
ORDERM. V. R. Prasad, AMThis appeal is directed against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) dated 29-1-1991 for the assessment year 1987-88. The first ground is that the Commissioner (Appeals) erred in upholding the finding of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHitachi Zosen Corporation Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
Mumbai
Apr-29-1998
Direct Taxation
(1999)63TTJ(Mumbai)391
ORDERR. V. Easwar, J.M.The following grounds have been taken by the assessee in this appeal.' 1. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Commissioner (Appeals) erred in holding that the assessee was...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSecond Income-tax Officer Vs. Ramji Dayawalla and Sons
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Jul-22-1981
Direct Taxation
(1982)2ITD121(Mum.)
1. The revenue in these appeals has disputed the orders of the Commissioner (Appeals) directing the ITO to allow weighted deduction under Section 35B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ('the Act') in respect of the payment...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
ingersoll-road India Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Nagpur
Mar-29-1983
Direct Taxation
(1986)17ITD1002(Nag.)
Per Shri D. V. Junnarkar, Accountant Member - In the present appeals, the assessee has disputed the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) upholding the deduction of the amount of proposed dividends amounting to Rs. 29,52,000 from...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSuhas Y. Chogle Vs. Sixth Income-tax Officer
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Jun-19-1987
Direct Taxation
(1988)25ITD445(Mum.)
1. The assessee has filed this appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) on the ground that the CIT(A), having accepted the assessee's contention that the order passed by the Income-tax Officer on...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNinth Income-tax Officer Vs. Mrs. Padma H. Koregaonkar.
Mumbai
Jun-29-1984
Direct Taxation
[1984]10ITD388(Mum)
ORDERPer Shri D. V. Junnarkar, Accountant Member - The assessee had a building called Sahyadri at Sawarkar Nagar, Poona. It appears that there was a very heavy rain in Poona on 9-10-1975, in consequence of which...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskFourth Income-tax Officer Vs. C. D. J. Essa Thaver.
Mumbai
May-05-1984
Direct Taxation
[1984]10ITD24(Mum)
ORDERPer Shri D. V. Junnarkar, Accountant Member - The assessee was employed as a passenger broker by the British India Steam Navigation Co. Ltd. incorporated in England (the UK Co.) with effect from 13-8-1937 on a...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDungershi Haridas Vs. Twelfth Income-tax Officer.
Mumbai
Mar-27-1984
Direct Taxation
[1984]9ITD129(Mum)
ORDERPer Shri D. V. Junnarkar, Accountant Member - The assessee was the owner of a building with some open land appurtenant thereto. There are already some tenants in the building. He entered into an agreement for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRoyal Interocean Lines Vs. Income-tax Officer.
Mumbai
Aug-23-1984
Direct Taxation
[1986]17ITD725(Mum)
ORDERPer Shri D. V. Junnarkar, Accountant Member - The assessee is a non-resident company engaged in the business of operation of ships, picking up of cargo and passengers in Indian ports occasionally. For the assessment year...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSiloo Homee Mistry Vs. Second Assistant Controller of Estate Duty.
Mumbai
Jun-25-1984
Direct Taxation
[1984]10ITD391(Mum)
ORDERPer Shri. D. V. Junnarkar, Accountant Member - Though the accountable persons have filed this appeal on various grounds, the only ground pressed at the time of the hearing is that the Appellate Controller had erred...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›