Advanced Search Results

Tirtha Nath Das Vs. State of Assam

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 5(2), 6(1), 7, 17 and 19; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 197 and 197(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 161

Advocate for Appellant : J.M. Choudhury and D. Talukdar, Advs.

A.H. Saikia, J.1. Heard Mr. M. Choudhury, learned senior counsel, assisted by Mr. D. Talukdar and Mr. N. Ahmed, learned counsel appearing for the appellant. Also heard Mr. K. Monir, learned PP, Assam.2. This criminal appeal...

Phatik Das Vs. State of Assam

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 304

Advocate for Appellant : D. Talukdar, Amicus Curiae

S.K. Kar, J.1. This is a jail appeal. Learned advocate Mr. D. Talukdar was appointed as Amicus Curiae. Heard both sides.2. Briefly stated, the prosecution case is that at about 7 p.m. at Mirza Batiapara, one...

Shri Biman Ghosh and anr. Vs. State of Assam

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Criminal

Acts : The Prevention of Food Adulteration Act 1954 - Section 7, 16, 10(7); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Cr.P.C) - Section 313

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. J.M. Choudhury; Mr. D. Talukdar, Advs.

[1]. The petitioners herein have been convicted under Section 7 read with Section 16 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 (hereinafter referred to in short as, "the PFA Act.") and they have been sentenced...

Pradip Kr. Roy Vs. Ghulam Rabbani and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 245(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 409

Advocate for Appellant : D. Talukdar, Adv.

I.A. Ansari, J.1. By the impugned order, dated 4.09.1997, passed in Complaint Case No. 1258C/1995, the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kamrup, Guwahati, has discharged the three accused-opposite party herein, namely, 1. Sri Pradip Kr. Roy, 2....

Dr. Jiten Barkakoti Vs. Subrata Patangia and anr.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : BankingCriminal

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 8, 9, 13, 14, 15, 16, 118 118A, 138 and 139

Advocate for Appellant : J.M. Choudhury, Sr. Counsel, B.M. Choudhury and D. Talukdar, Advs.

P.G. Agarwal, J.1. Heard Mr. J.M. Choudhury, learned Sr. Counsel, assisted by Mr. D. Talukdar, for the petitioner and Mr. K. Agarwal, learned counsel appearing for the respondent-complainant.2. The complainant, Shri Subrata Patangia, filed a written...

Mrs. Moni Orang Vs. the State of Assam

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Criminal

Judgment and Order, (Oral) 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order, dated 17.07.2006, passed, in Sessions Case No. 101 of 2004, by the learned Sessions Judge, Dibrugarh, convicting the accused-appellant, Smt. Moni Orang,...

Anup Nath and ors. Vs. State of Assam

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Criminal

H. Barua, J.1. The appellants stood charged under Sections 120 (B), 364,302/34 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code for causing death of Purna Kanta Nath on 30th of November, 1992. All the three appellants were...

Manoranjan Kalita Vs. the State of Assam

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Land Acquisition

Judgment and Order, (Oral): 1. By the judgment and order, dated 24.08.2010, passed, in Special Case No. 06/2007, by the learned Special Judge, Guwahati, Assam, the accused-appellant, namely, Manoranjan Kalita, stands convicted under Section 13(1)(e) read...

Ganesh Gogoi Vs. State of Assam

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Criminal

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. D. Talukdar

Aftab H. Saikia, J.1. Heard Mr. D. Talukdar, learned Counsel for the appellant. Also heard Mr. P.C. Gayan, learned P.P. Assam.2. The conviction of the appellant under Section 302 IPC and the resultant sentence to rigorous...

ideal Trading Corporation and Anr. Vs. Employees' State Insurance Corp ...

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 2(9)(1) and 82(2)

Advocate for Appellant : B. Kalita, D. Talukdar and M. Rahman, Advs.

D. Biswas, J. 1. None appears for the appellants when the case is taken up for hearing. Heard Mr. B.R. Dey, the learned counsel for the respondent Corporation. 2. This appeal is preferred against the order...