Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: d sivakumaran · Page 1 of about 8 results (0.031 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 11 1997

M. Mujibulla Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-11-1997

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (1997)IILLJ603Mad

Advocate for Appellant : D. Sivakumaran, Adv.

ORDER1. By consent of all the parties the main writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. Against the order of transfer transferring the petitioner from Salem Steel Plant to Bokaro Steel Plant, the petitioner...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 19 2002

United India Insurance Company Limited Vs. Amir Basha,

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-19-2002

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 173

Reported in : III(2003)ACC104; 2003ACJ1386; AIR2003Mad237; (2003)1MLJ283; MANU/TN/2496/2002

Advocate for Appellant : M.S. Krishnan, Adv.

P. Sathasivam, J.1. United India Insurance Company Limited, aggrieved by the award of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (Chief Judicial Magistrate), Dharmapuri at Krishnagiri dated 23-8-1995 made in M.C.O.P. No. 138 of 1994, has preferred the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 26 2008

S.R. Jeyaraman and Vs. G. Jothirlingam and ors., All Are Represented b ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-26-2008

Subject : Civil

Acts : Tamil Nadu Court fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955 - Sections 25 and 40; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 7, Rules 9 and 11

Reported in : (2008)4MLJ86

Advocate for Appellant : D. Shivakumaran, Adv.

ORDERA.C. Arumugaperumal Adityan, J.1. Heard the learned counsel Mr. D. Sivakumaran, who extensively made his objection regarding the order passed in CRP.(NPD). No. 1399 of 2006. The grievance of the learned counsel is that under Order...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jun 03 2013

T.Raja Reddy Vs. C.Srinivasa Reddy

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-03-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated : 03.06.2013 Coram THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU C.R.P (NPD) No.1324 of 2010 and M.P.No.1 of 2010 T.Raja Reddy .Petitioner -versus 1.C.Srinivasa Reddy 2.K.C.Chinnamuni Reddy 3.Thimmakka 4.Chenna 5.Savitrama...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 07 2026

G.Natarajan vs the District Collector

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-07-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 07-04-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE1. G.Natarajan2. G.Manoharan ..Petitioner(s) Vs..Respondent(s) Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of writ of Mandamus...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 27 2004

Kadambur Primary Agricultural Co-operative Bank Limited, Rep. by Its P ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-27-2004

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : [2004(102)FLR969]; (2004)3MLJ241

Advocate for Appellant : D. Sivakumaran, Adv.

ORDERC. Nagappan, J.1. The petitioner has sought for issuance of writ of certiorari to quash the Award, dated 27.03.1997, passed in I.D.No.52 of 1996 by the first respondent Labour Court.2. The second respondent was employed as...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 29 2002

Muthusamy Vs. Mani,

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-29-2002

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Indian Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Articles 134 and 180; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 151 - Order 21, Rule 95

Reported in : (2002)1MLJ689

Advocate for Appellant : D. Sivakumaran, Adv.

ORDERK. Raviraja Pandian, J.1. The above Civil Revision Petition is filed underSection 115 of the Civil Procedure Code against the orderdated 16.8.1996 made in an application filed in R.E.A.No.1023of 1993 under Order 21 Rule 95 and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 27 2012

Kannusamy Naicker (Died) and Others Vs. Nataraja Naicker and Others

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-27-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : For the Appellants: Ms. P.T. Asha, for M/s. Sarvabhauman Associates, Advocates. For the Respondents: R1 and R3, K. Meenakshi Sundaram, R13, R15 and R16, D. Sivakumaran, R12, P.V. Rangaraajan, Advocates, R4 to R8, R10, R11, R14, R17 to R20, Ex-Parte in low

(Prayer: Appeal against the judgement and decree dated 30.11.2004 passed by the Additional District Judge(Fast Track Court III), Vridhachalam, in O.S.No.6 of 2004.) 1. This appeal is focussed by the plaintiff as against the judgement and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial