Advanced Search Results

Bhupender Lal Ghai Vs. Crown Buildtech Private Limited

Court : Delhi

Subject : Contempt of Courts

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act; Delhi High Court Arbitration Centre (Arbitrators Fees) Rules

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. D.S. Chadha, Adv.

1. The applications, i.e. I.A. No.5824/2011 and I.A. No.5823/2011 had been jointly filed by the parties, duly signed by the parties and their respective counsels and also supported by the affidavits of the petitioner and Mr....

Virsa Singh Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

$~35. * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.6990/2012 Date of decision:22. d October, 2013 VIRSA SINGH ..... Petitioner Through Mr. S.S. Arora & Mr. D.S. Chadha, Advocates. versus...

Stichting Doen-postcode Loterij Vs. VIn Poly Recyclers Pvt. Ltd. and o ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : SICA

Acts : Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 15, 16, 22 and 32; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 33 - Order 1, Rule 10 - Order 9, Rule 7 - Order 18, Rule 17A - Order 20, Rules 1(1) and 5A

Reported in : [2010]154CompCas155(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : D.S. Chadha, Adv

Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, J.1. This appeal has been preferred by the plaintiff in the suit before the learned Single Judge, against the order dated 12th December, 2008 staying further proceedings in the suit under Section 22...

Krishan Murari Gupta Vs. Hemant Kumar Sethi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138

Reported in : 1997VIAD(Delhi)655; 69(1997)DLT1042; (1998)118PLR10

Advocate for Appellant : A.S. Chandhiok,; B.L. Wali and; D.S. Chadha, Advs

Manmohan Sarin, J. (1) Petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 16.9.97 of the Additional District Judge, granting leave to defend the Suit, subject to the condition that petitioner deposited a sum of Rs. 2,50,000.00 within...

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Haldiram India (Pvt.) Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2005)(99)ECC577

1. In these two appeals, filed by Revenue the issue involved is whether the products namely "Badam Summer Sip" and "Thandai" manufactured by M/s. Haldiram India Pvt. ltd. are classifiable under sub-Heading No.2001.10 of the Schedule...

Somla and ors. Vs. Rampuri and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : 1995ACJ1094

Advocate for Appellant : S. Patwa, Adv.

Deepak Verma, J.1. This is an appeal under Section 110-D of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, against the award dated 7.11.1985 passed by Mr. V.D. Bajpai, Member, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Jhabua, in Claim Case No....

Bishan Dass Mehta and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : CivilFood Adulteration

Acts : Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 2; ;Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1970Delhi267

Advocate for Appellant : N.D. Bali and; Roshan Lal, Advs

ORDER1. The question that arises in this petition is whether Katha is included within the meaning of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) and whether Item A-21 of Appendix B...

D.S. Chadha and ors. Vs. Gian Singh and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : InsuranceMotor Vehicles

Reported in : I(1993)ACC492

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Yogesh Malhotra

D.K. Jain, J.1. This first appeal under Section 110-D of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') is directed against the award of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Delhi (hereinafter referred to...

Bachan Singh Vs. the Oriental Insurance Company Limited Ferozepur Thro ...

Court : Punjab State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chandigarh

Subject : MRTP

Inderjit Kaushik, Presiding Member 1. Sh. Bachan Singh, appellant/complainant (In short “the appellant”) has filed this appeal against the order dated 24.09.2008 passed by the learned District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Ferozepur (in short “the District...

Manmohan Singh Cheema Vs. New India Assurance Co. Ltd. and Another

Court : Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission UT Chandigarh

Subject : Service Tax

Maj. Gen. S.P. Kapoor, Member: 1. This is an appeal against order of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh (for short hereinafter to be referred as District Forum) dated 15.4.2008 passed in complaint case No....