Advanced Search Results

A. Raja Reddy Vs. the Collector and District Magistrate and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Boot-Leggers, Dacoits, Drug Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders and Land Grabbers Act, 1986 - Sections 2, 3, 3(1), 3(2), 12 and 13; Indian Penal Code

Reported in : 1996(2)ALD(Cri)947; 1996(4)ALT305

Advocate for Appellant : C. Praveen Kumar, Adv.

R. Bayapu Reddy, J.1. This writ of Habeas Corpus is filed by the petitioner who is the father of the detenu by name A, Mallareddy R/o. Madapur, Nirmal Mandal in Adilabad District, for quashing the detention...

Smt. Pilli Yeteswari and anr. Vs. the Govt. of A.P. Rep. by Its Chief ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Boot-leggers, Dacoits, Drug Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders and Land Grabbers Act, 1986 - Sections 2; Constitution of India - Article 21; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 380; Railway Property (Unlawful Possession) Act - Sections 3

Reported in : 1996(4)ALT485; 1997(1)ALT(Cri)184

Advocate for Appellant : C. Padmanabha Reddy, Adv. for ;C. Praveen Kumar and ;T. Gopalakrishna, Advs.

ORDERLingaraja Rath, J.1. These two cases challenge the orders of preventive detention passed against the respective petitioners by the Commissioner of Police and Addl. District Magistrate, Visakhapatnam. Orders of detention were passed on 6-6-1996 under the...

Rai Bahadur Seth Gujar Mal Modi and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Income-ta ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 34(1A) and 34(1B); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : [1973]87ITR159(All)

Advocate for Appellant : D.S. Agarwal and ;Shanti Bhushan, Advs.

Hari Swarup, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment of the learned single judge, dismissing the writ petition. The petition was filed against the orders of the Income-tax Officer, requiring the petitioner to pay a...

Mohinder Singh Vs. Controller of Estate Duty

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Estate Duty Act, 1953 - Sections 64(1); Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Rules, 1955

Reported in : [1972]85ITR358(All)

Advocate for Appellant : D.S. Agarwal, Adv.

C.S.P. Singh, J. 1. The Central Board of Direct Taxes, New Delhi, has under Section 64(1) of the Estate Duty Act, 1953, referred the following question for our opinion : 'Whether, on the facts and in...

Chandulal Jethalal Jaiswal Vs. the Commissioner of Police and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985 - Sections 2, 3, 3(1), 3(2), 3(4), 5A, 6, 6(4) and 15; Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 - Sections 2(10), 2(24), 2(43), 21, 67 and 93; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 107, 110 and 437; Bombay Police Act - Sections 56; Conservation of Foreign Exchange And Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act 1974 - Sections 5A; Constitution of India - Article 22(4) and 22(5); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 119, 120B, 177, 193, 197, 198, 199, 200, 416, 417, 419, 420, 465, 468, 471 and 477; Bombay Denatured Spirit Rules, 1959 - Rules 2(14), 3, 23, 25 and 26; Gujarat Spirit Denaturing Rules, 1964 - Rules 3 and 4

Reported in : 1991CriLJ2864; (1990)1GLR599

Advocate for Appellant : H.L. Patel, Adv.

B.S. Kapadia, J.1. The petitioner-detenu has filed this hebeas corpus petition with a prayer that the detention order (Annexure-A to the petition) passed against him by the detaining authority be set aside and that the respondents...

In the Matter Of: M/S. Enercon (India) Limited, Jaipur and Another Vs. ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Counsel for the Appellant(s) : Mr. M.G. Ramachandran, Mr. Anand K. Ganeshan, Ms. Swapna Seshadri, Advocates. Counsel for the Respondent(s) : R2, R4, Mr. K.L. Dhayani Mr. K.L. Nandwani Mr. R.K. Mehta M

P.S. DATTA, JUDICIAL MEMBER 1. How is tariff for the Wind Energy Projects to be commissioned during the FY 2010-11 in the State of Rajasthan to be determined? Whether Regulation 85 of the Rajasthan Electricity Regulatory...

M/s. Birla Cement Works Vs. Rajasthan Electricity Regulatory Commissio ...

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Subject : Electricity

Sunil Ambwani, Actg. C.J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the appellants. Mr.Bipin Gupta appears for Rajasthan Electricity Regulatory Commission and Ms.Parinitoo Jain for Ajmer Vidhyut Vitaran Nigam Limited, Ajmer. 2. The appellants are industrial consumers...