Advanced Search Results
Ram Dayal Kalla Vs. Ito
Rajasthan
Mar-22-2004
Direct Taxation
(2004)90TTJ(NULL)450
Suresh Ojha, for the Assessee D.R. Zala & T.R. Chawla, for the Revenue.
ORDERN.K. SAIni, A.M.:This is an appeal by the assessee against the order of the learned Commissioner, dated 22-3-1999, passed under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for assessment year 1993-94.2. This appeal was barred...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPawan Cotton Mills Vs. Ito
Rajasthan
Mar-18-2004
Direct Taxation
(2004)90TTJ(NULL)1057
Suresh Ojha, for the Assessee. D.R. Zala, for the Revenue.
ORDERMaratha, J.M.This appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order of the CIT (A) dated 21-6-1994 pertaining to assessment year 1988-89.2. The only effective issue before us is whether the penalty levied under section...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDy. Cit Vs. Ramdeo Kumar
Rajasthan
Jan-09-2004
Direct Taxation
[2004]140TAXMAN102(Raj)
D.R. Zala, for the Revenue N.M. Ranka and R. Yadav, for the Assessee
ORDERN.K. Saini, A.M.The appeals filed by the department. and the C.Os. filed by the assessee are directed against the orders of the Commissioner (Appeals) dated 30-3-1999 and dated 24-3-1999 for the assessment years 1994-95 and 1995-96...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Mangilal Rameshwarlal Soni (Huf) Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jodhpur
Mar-19-2004
Direct Taxation
(2004)83TTJ(Jodh.)770
1. These cross appeals are preferred against the order of CIT(A), Jodhpur dt. 4th June, 2001, and pertain to block period from 1987-88 to 1997-98. The grounds raised in both the appeals are inter-woven and arise...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMilap Textile Mills Vs. Dy. Cit
Rajasthan
Apr-02-2004
Direct Taxation
(2004)86TTJ(NULL)1125
ORDERN.K. Saint A.M.These two cross appeals by department and assessee are directed against the order of Commissioner (Appeals) dated 13-12-1993. Since the main issue involved is common and the appeals were heard together, so these are...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDy. Cit Vs. Brandari Marble (P) Ltd.
Rajasthan
Jan-22-2004
Direct Taxation
(2004)88TTJ(NULL)605
ORDERN.K. Sarini, A.M.This is an appeal by the department against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) dated 25-11-1994. The only ground raised in this appeal reads as under :'On the facts and in the circumstances of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShree Rajasthan Syntex Ltd. Vs. Asstt. Commissioner of
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jodhpur
Dec-22-2003
Direct Taxation
(2005)93ITD78(Jodh.)
1. Both these appeals pertain to same assessee for two A.Ys., namely, 1996-97 and 1997-98 and identical issues are involved in both these appeals. So, for the sake of convenience, these are being disposed off by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSudhir Industries Vs. Income Tax Officer
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jodhpur
Sep-17-2003
Direct Taxation
(2003)81TTJ(Jodh.)765
1. This appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order of CIT(A), Jodhpur dt. 25th April, 1994, pertaining to asst. yr. 1989-90.2. The brief facts of the case are that the AO made an...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Premlata Surya Vs. Gift Tax Officer
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jodhpur
May-21-2004
Direct Taxation
(2005)92TTJ(Jodh.)941
1. This gift-tax appeal of the assessee pertains to asst. yr. 1995-96 and arises out of an order passed under Section 15(3} of the GT Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), and is directed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDeputy Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Smt. Archna Devi
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jodhpur
May-12-2004
Direct Taxation
(2004)84TTJ(Jodh.)467
1. These are cross-appeals : one filed by the Revenue and another filed by the assessee against the order of CIT(A), Jodhpur, for the asst. yr.1994-95. Since the issues raised in both the appeals arise from...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »