Advanced Search Results
G.V.K. Industries Limited and anr. Vs. Income-tax Officer and anr.
Andhra Pradesh
May-02-1997
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 5(2), 9(1), 163(1), 169 and 264; ;Income Tax Act, 1962 - Sections 9(1)
[1997]228ITR564(AP)
D.R. Dhanuka, Adv. for ;C.V. Rajiv Reddy and ;C. Kodandaram, Advs.
Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri, J.1. This writ petition arises out of the application filed by the first petitioner, G.V.K. Industries Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the 'petitioner-company'), under section 195 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPalitana Sugar Mills Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Gujarat
Gujarat
Dec-17-1999
CivilProperty
(2000)3GLR186
D.R. Dhanuka, Sr. Counsel,; Manek Kalyaniwala, Solicitor, and;
D.C. Srivastava, J.1. Notice of this writ petition was served on the respondents. Shri S.N. Shelat, learned Addl. Advocate General with Shri S.P. Hasulkar appeared and argued the matter for and on behalf of respondents No.1...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskFocus Advertising Private Ltd. Vs. Ahoora Blocks Private Ltd.
Mumbai
Oct-31-1974
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 433, 434, 447, 537 and 557
[1975]45CompCas534(Bom)
D.R. Dhanuka, Adv. for appellants-company, ;G.J. Desai, Adv. for respondents-original petitioners, ;G.J. Desai, Adv. for Wagle Process Studio & Press Ltd. -supporting creditors, ;C.M. Khorde, Adv.
Mukhi, J.1. This is an appeal from the order of winding up passed by the learned company judge (Vimadalal J.) whereby he ordered that the company, Messrs. Focus Advertising Private Ltd., be wound up under the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Mangesh G. Salodkar Vs. Monsanto Chemicals of India Ltd. and ors.
Mumbai
Jul-13-2006
Service
Insecticides Act, 1968; Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 41E and 91; Income Tax Act, 1961; Constitution of India - Articles 21, 39, 41, 42, 43 and 226
2007(2)BomCR883
Tanu Mehta, Amicus Curiae;Mihir Desai, Adv.;C.R. Sonewane, Adv.
D.Y. Chandrachud, J.1. The activities of Monsanto:Monsanto Chemicals of India Ltd. ('Monsanto') is engaged in the formulation of herbicides. Those formulations are sold under the brand names of Machete, Lasso, Roundup and Avadex. The active ingredients...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSwati R. Khinvasara Vs. State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Aug-08-2011
Education
Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994 - Section 53(1), 7(2), 5(15), 85(5)
JUDGMENT (Per A.M. Khanwilkar, J.):- 1) By this common judgment, we propose to dispose of the above mentioned matters together as the same involve common issues. 2) The first Writ Petition (Writ Petition No.1430 of 2011)...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askinternational Airports Authority Employees Union Vs. International Air ...
Mumbai
Apr-01-2002
Labour and Industrial
International Airports Authority of India Act, 1971; Airports Authority of India Act, 1994 - Sections 3; Maharashtra Private Security Guards (Regulations of Employment and Welfare) Act, 1981 - Sections 22; ;Constitution of India - Article 226
2002(5)BomCR43; (2002)IIILLJ277Bom
K.K. Singhvi, ;S.K. Singhvi, ;Ramesh Dubey and ;Susheel Mahadeshar, Advs.
S.J. Vazifdar, J.1. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners in the above petitions agreed that the decision in Writ Petition No. 1623 of 1991 will decide the fate of all the above petitions. We...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSulabha Govind Vidwans Vs. Shravan M. Shevale and ors.
Mumbai
Oct-07-1994
Labour and Industrial
1995(2)BomCR561; 1995(1)MhLj157
D.R. Dhanuka, J.1. The subject matter of the controversy raised by this petition stands concluded by ration of decisions of the Supreme Court in the case of Dr. Chakradhar Paswan v. State of Bihar and others,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVasant Abaji Mandke Vs. the State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Oct-04-1978
ConstitutionDirect Taxation
(1979)81BOMLR542
Deshpande, J.1. Petitioners in this group of petitions are all legal practitioners two of them having enrolled as such practitioners after retirement from service. Under Section 3 of the Maharashtra State Tax on Professions, Trades, Callings...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNandan Builders Vs. V.G. Apte Estate Trust and ors.
Mumbai
Apr-19-1995
Trusts and societiesProperty
Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 - Sections 36; Constitution of India - Article 226
1995(4)BomCR28
M.D. Hombalkar and G.S. Godbole, Advs.
D.R. Dhanuka, J.1. Rule. Heard forthwith for final hearing.2. Heard learned Counsel on all sides. Perused the petition and all the affidavits and documents on record. Perused the original record of proceedings before the Joint Charity...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMunicipal Corporation of Gr. Bombay Vs. Santan Marshall Fernandes
Mumbai
Feb-17-1986
Motor Vehicles
Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 110A; Fatal Accidents Act, 1885 - Sections 1A; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 2(11)
1986(2)BomCR474; (1986)88BOMLR683; 1986MhLJ633
D.D. Dhanuka, Amicus Curie;R.S. Bhonsale and ;Bhushan R. Gavai, Advs., i/b., Mulla and Mulla and C.B.C.
C.S. Dharmadhikari, J.1. In this writ petition the petitioner Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay-B.E.S.T. has challenged the order passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal overruling the preliminary objection raised to the very maintainability of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »