Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: d r dhanuka · Page 1 of about 258 results (0.096 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 02 1997

G.V.K. Industries Limited and anr. Vs. Income-tax Officer and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : May-02-1997

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 5(2), 9(1), 163(1), 169 and 264; ;Income Tax Act, 1962 - Sections 9(1)

Reported in : [1997]228ITR564(AP)

Advocate for Appellant : D.R. Dhanuka, Adv. for ;C.V. Rajiv Reddy and ;C. Kodandaram, Advs.

Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri, J.1. This writ petition arises out of the application filed by the first petitioner, G.V.K. Industries Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the 'petitioner-company'), under section 195 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 17 1999

Palitana Sugar Mills Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Dec-17-1999

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Constitution of India

Reported in : (2000)3GLR186

Advocate for Appellant : D.R. Dhanuka, Sr. Counsel,; Manek Kalyaniwala, Solicitor, and;

D.C. Srivastava, J.1. Notice of this writ petition was served on the respondents. Shri S.N. Shelat, learned Addl. Advocate General with Shri S.P. Hasulkar appeared and argued the matter for and on behalf of respondents No.1...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 31 1974

Focus Advertising Private Ltd. Vs. Ahoora Blocks Private Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-31-1974

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 433, 434, 447, 537 and 557

Reported in : [1975]45CompCas534(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : D.R. Dhanuka, Adv. for appellants-company, ;G.J. Desai, Adv. for respondents-original petitioners, ;G.J. Desai, Adv. for Wagle Process Studio & Press Ltd. -supporting creditors, ;C.M. Khorde, Adv.

Mukhi, J.1. This is an appeal from the order of winding up passed by the learned company judge (Vimadalal J.) whereby he ordered that the company, Messrs. Focus Advertising Private Ltd., be wound up under the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 13 2006

Mangesh G. Salodkar Vs. Monsanto Chemicals of India Ltd. and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-13-2006

Subject : Service

Acts : Insecticides Act, 1968; Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 41E and 91; Income Tax Act, 1961; Constitution of India - Articles 21, 39, 41, 42, 43 and 226

Reported in : 2007(2)BomCR883

Advocate for Appellant : Tanu Mehta, Amicus Curiae;Mihir Desai, Adv.;C.R. Sonewane, Adv.

D.Y. Chandrachud, J.1. The activities of Monsanto:Monsanto Chemicals of India Ltd. ('Monsanto') is engaged in the formulation of herbicides. Those formulations are sold under the brand names of Machete, Lasso, Roundup and Avadex. The active ingredients...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 08 2011

Swati R. Khinvasara Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-08-2011

Subject : Education

Acts : Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994 - Section 53(1), 7(2), 5(15), 85(5)

JUDGMENT (Per A.M. Khanwilkar, J.):- 1) By this common judgment, we propose to dispose of the above mentioned matters together as the same involve common issues. 2) The first Writ Petition (Writ Petition No.1430 of 2011)...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 01 2002

international Airports Authority Employees Union Vs. International Air ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-01-2002

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : International Airports Authority of India Act, 1971; Airports Authority of India Act, 1994 - Sections 3; Maharashtra Private Security Guards (Regulations of Employment and Welfare) Act, 1981 - Sections 22; ;Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2002(5)BomCR43; (2002)IIILLJ277Bom

Advocate for Appellant : K.K. Singhvi, ;S.K. Singhvi, ;Ramesh Dubey and ;Susheel Mahadeshar, Advs.

S.J. Vazifdar, J.1. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners in the above petitions agreed that the decision in Writ Petition No. 1623 of 1991 will decide the fate of all the above petitions. We...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 07 1994

Sulabha Govind Vidwans Vs. Shravan M. Shevale and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-07-1994

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : 1995(2)BomCR561; 1995(1)MhLj157

D.R. Dhanuka, J.1. The subject matter of the controversy raised by this petition stands concluded by ration of decisions of the Supreme Court in the case of Dr. Chakradhar Paswan v. State of Bihar and others,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 04 1978

Vasant Abaji Mandke Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-04-1978

Subject : ConstitutionDirect Taxation

Reported in : (1979)81BOMLR542

Deshpande, J.1. Petitioners in this group of petitions are all legal practitioners two of them having enrolled as such practitioners after retirement from service. Under Section 3 of the Maharashtra State Tax on Professions, Trades, Callings...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 19 1995

Nandan Builders Vs. V.G. Apte Estate Trust and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-19-1995

Subject : Trusts and societiesProperty

Acts : Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 - Sections 36; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1995(4)BomCR28

Advocate for Appellant : M.D. Hombalkar and G.S. Godbole, Advs.

D.R. Dhanuka, J.1. Rule. Heard forthwith for final hearing.2. Heard learned Counsel on all sides. Perused the petition and all the affidavits and documents on record. Perused the original record of proceedings before the Joint Charity...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 17 1986

Municipal Corporation of Gr. Bombay Vs. Santan Marshall Fernandes

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-17-1986

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 110A; Fatal Accidents Act, 1885 - Sections 1A; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 2(11)

Reported in : 1986(2)BomCR474; (1986)88BOMLR683; 1986MhLJ633

Advocate for Appellant : D.D. Dhanuka, Amicus Curie;R.S. Bhonsale and ;Bhushan R. Gavai, Advs., i/b., Mulla and Mulla and C.B.C.

C.S. Dharmadhikari, J.1. In this writ petition the petitioner Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay-B.E.S.T. has challenged the order passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal overruling the preliminary objection raised to the very maintainability of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial