Advanced Search Results
Mandi Transport Co. Ltd. Vs. Himachal Pradesh Administration and anr.
Himachal Pradesh
May-29-1957
Company
Companies Act, 1913 - Sections 179, 212 and 212(3); ;Companies (Amendment) Act, 1956 - Sections 457 and 512(4); ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6, Rule 17
D.R. Chaudhary and; Kedar Ishwar, Advs.
ORDER(20) The appeal is allowed to this limited extent that the plaintiffs-appellants will be liable to pay only one half of the costs of the defendants-respondents in the trial Court. In other respects, the appeal is...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJai Ram Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Allahabad
May-14-2004
Service
Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16 and 309; Uttar Pradesh Rural Engineering (Group 'A') Services Rules, 1991 - Rule 5
2004(3)AWC2743
T.P. Singh, ;S.K. Srivastava, ;A.K. Srivastava and ;D.R. Chaudhary, Advs.
M. Katju and Poonam Srivastava, JJ.1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. By means of present writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the 'Uttar Pradesh Rural Engineering (Group 'A') Services (Fourth Amendment) Rules, 2003, whereby Rule...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSangam Lal Singh (In Jail) Vs. State of U.P.
Allahabad
Apr-18-2003
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 109, 300 and 302
2004CriLJ95
D.R. Chaudhary, ;V.C. Tiwary and ;Ashok Verma, Advs.
K.N. Ojha, J. 1. These appeals have been preferred against order of conviction and sentence dated 31-7-1980, passed by learned V. Addl. Sessions Judge, Allahabad, in S. T. No. 382 of 1978, State v. Sangam Lal...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Santosh Kumar and Etc. Vs. State of U.P.
Allahabad
Aug-29-2001
Criminal
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 6, 32, 32(1), 114A and 134; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 302, 306, 326, 336, 363, 376, 376(2), 427, 452, 504 and 506
2002CriLJ301
A.D. Giri, ;Shashank Shekhar, ;J.S. Sengar and ;D.R. Chaudhary, Advs.
U.S. Tripathi, J. 1. The above three appeals have been preferred against the judgment and order dated 27-10-1999 passed by Sri Indra Bahadur Singh, the learned 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Varanasi, in Sessions Trial No. 161...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSunil Kumar Vs. State of U.P.
Allahabad
Jul-25-2000
Criminal
Juvenile Justice Act, 1986 - Sections 37; Children Act; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 37, 302 and 307
2000CriLJ4687
D.R. Chaudhary, Adv.
ORDERB.K. Rathi, J.1. Revisionist, Sunil Kumar is an accused in case crime No. 405 of 2000, under Section 307, 302/34, IPC police station Khurja Nagar, district Bulandshahar. He moved an application before the Juvenile Judge alleging...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRam Dutta Vs. State of U.P. and anr.
Allahabad
Apr-11-2002
Service
Constitution of India - Article 309
2002(2)AWC1634
Sudhir Narain Agarwal, ;Manish Kumar Nigam, ;Nagendra Kumar Srivastava and ;Neeraj Agarwal, Advs.
S.P. Srivastava and D.R. Chaudhary, JJ. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel representing the respondent Nos. 1 and 2. 2. Perused the record. 3. The petitioner while he...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAjai Alias Ajju and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Others
Allahabad
Feb-22-2012
Criminal
Sri. N.I. Zafri, Sri. Rajeev Gupta, Sri. A.C. Srivastava, Sri. N.I. Jafri, Sri. Jafri
Ramesh Sinha, J. The aforesaid jail appeals have been filed by the appellants against the judgment and order dated 24.9.2009, passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Court No.3, Ghaziabad in S.T. No.1371of 2007 (State Vs. Braj...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSunil Vs. State of Up
Allahabad
Mar-31-2011
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Cr.P.C) - Section 313; Arms Act - Section 302/309 and 25/4
1. Challenge in this Appeal is to the verdict of conviction recorded by Addl Sessions Judge Kanpur Nagar vide judgment and order dated 21.12.2009 whereby the appellant who was arraigned of offences under section 302/309 and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskFather Thomas and ors Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Allahabad
Dec-22-2010
Right to Information
1. We have heard Sri. G.S. Chaturvedi Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Samit Gopal, Sri D.S. Mishra and Sri Dileep Gupta Advocates for the private parties and Sri Patanjali Mishra, A.G.A., Sri Neeraj Verma, A.G.A., and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRe: in the Matter of Matrimonial Disputes Vs. State of U.P. and Others
Allahabad
Sep-30-2011
Land Acquisition
2012(3)KLT49(SN)(C.No.50)
On 8.8.2011, there was an extensive hearing in this case when Ms. Leena Jauhari, Secretary (Home), Government of U.P. Lucknow, Smt. Poonam Sikand, Additional L.R and Tanuja Srivastava, I.G.( Public Grievances), Ms. G. Sridevi, Secretary, U.P....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »