Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: d pangam · Page 1 of about 59 results (0.381 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 25 2008

Xavier D'Souza and Anr. Vs. Luis D'Souza and Anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-25-2008

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 12(2); Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 3; Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 17, 30(2), 47, 51, 55 and 60; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Articles 58 and 59; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 7, Rule 11

Reported in : 2009(1)BomCR250

Advocate for Appellant : D. Pangam, Adv.

Britto N.A., J.1. Heard Mr. D. Pangam, learned Counsel on behalf of the Appellants and Mr. S.D. Padiyar, learned Counsel on behalf of the Respondents.2. Admit. By consent heard forthwith.3. This is plaintiffs' appeal against rejection...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 12 1998

Shri Joaquim Gama and Others Vs. Shri Custodio Gama Alias Kistod Gama

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-12-1998

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 115, Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 36 and 37; Goa, Daman & Diu Land Revenue Code, 1968 - Sections 105

Reported in : 1999(2)BomCR561

Advocate for Appellant : D. Pangam, Adv.

ORDERR.M.S. Khandeparkar, J. 1. This is a revision application against the Order dated 30th April 1997 passed by the District Judge, South Goa, Margao in Miscellaneous Civil Appeal No. 24 of 1997. By the impugned Order...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 30 2003

Zuari Estate Development and Investment Co. (P) Ltd. Vs. J.R. Kanekar, ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-30-2003

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2004]139TAXMAN209(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Porus F. Kaka, D. Pangam and Ms. Gandha Sambari, for the Assessee S.R. Rivonkar and Ms. Amina Fadte, for the Revenue

ORDERF.I. Rebello, J.The petitioner-company carries on business of hiring of plant and machinery. The petitioner had by an agreement, dated 28-6-1982, entered into with Prerna Premises Private Limited, agreed to purchase three office premises, being office...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 25 2015

Gopalkrishna Shantaram Borkar Vs. State of Goa, through its Chief Secr ...

Court : Mumbai Goa

Decided on : Mar-25-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

Oral Judgment: (F.M. Reis, J.) 1. Heard Shri D. Zaveri, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, Shri V. Rodrigues, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the respondents and Advocate Shri D. Pangam, learned Amicus Curiae. 2....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 14 2016

Minguelino D'Costa Vs. State of Goa, through its Chief Secretary and O ...

Court : Mumbai Goa

Decided on : Mar-14-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

Oral Judgment: (K. L. Wadane, J.) 1. Heard Mr. D. Pangam, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, Mr. S. R. Rivankar, learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent nos.1 and 2 and Mr. R. G. Ramani,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 14 2012

Shri Rama Krishna Sarmalkar Vs. Shri Krishna Babu Kinlekar and Others

Court : Mumbai Goa

Decided on : Jun-14-2012

Subject : Constitution

Oral Judgment: Heard Shri S.G. Dessai, the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner, Shri A.D. Bhobe, the learned Counsel appearing for respondents no.1 to 4 and 7 to 13 and Shri D. Pangam, the learned...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 12 2015

Kunda Madhukar Shetye and Others Vs. Shaila Subrao Shetye and Others

Court : Mumbai Goa

Decided on : Mar-12-2015

Subject : Education

Oral Judgment: 1. Both these Appeals From Order arise from the same suit and are between the same parties and they have been argued together, and are disposed of by this common judgment. 2. The Appeal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 24 2000

Shri Arjun Tukaram Shetgaonkar and Others Vs. Smt. Urmila Vaikunth Des ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-24-2000

Subject : CompanyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 22, Rule 1 and 3; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 397 and 398

Reported in : 2000(4)BomCR406; 2000(3)MhLj830

Advocate for Appellant : S.M. Usgaonkar, Adv.

ORDERR.M.S. Khandeparkar, J.1. This revision application arises from order dated 18-1-1999 passed in Special Civil Suit No. 141/1992/II by the IInd Additional Civil Judge, Senior Division, Mapusa. By the impugned order, the trial Court has allowed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 06 2009

New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Laxmi Rama Padsalgi (Smt.) and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-06-2009

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 2(30), 35A, 140, 147 and 168; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 2, Rule 2 - Order 41, Rule 33; Constitution of India - Articles 136 and 142

Reported in : 2009(3)BomCR647; 2009(4)MhLj50

Advocate for Appellant : E. Afonso, Adv.

Britto N.A., J.1. This appeal is directed against award dated 29-3-2005 of the learned M.A.C.T. (Motor Accident Claims Tribunal), Mapusa.2. Some undisputed facts may be stated to dispose off this appeal. Rama Padsalgi, the deceased husband/father...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 03 2012

Raul Prazeres Vs. State of Goa, Through the Chief Secretary and Others

Court : Mumbai Goa

Decided on : Sep-03-2012

Subject : Education

Oral Judgment: Heard Shri Sudesh Usgaonkar, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, Shri S. Narvekar, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for respondents no.1 and 2, Shri D. Pangam, learned Counsel appearing for respondent no.3 and Shri...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial