Advanced Search Results

Binod Kumar Vs. Ranchi Kshetriya GramIn Bank and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Service

Acts : Service Law

Reported in : 2001(49)BLJR1057

Advocate for Appellant : Anil Kumar Sinha,; R. Krishna and; S. Arun, Advs.

S.J. Mukhopadhaya, J. 1. Thepetitioner, a clerk cum cashier appointed wasnot granted promotion to the post of FieldSupervisor though juniors including respondent Nos. 3 to 7. were promoted by notification No, 1990 - Promotion-1/dated 20thNovember, 1990...

Rasmuni Marandi Vs. State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand)

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : [2007(4)JCR511(Jhr)]

D.P. Singh, J.1. Sole appellant Rasmuni Marandi stands convicted for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for causing death of her own Gotani, Dola Murmu in the night of 8th of...

Yogeshwar Hembram and anr. Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2007CriLJ1050; [2006(4)JCR646(Jhr)]

D.P. Singh, J.1. Both the appellants stands convicted under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to serve rigorous imprisonment for five years vide judgment and order dated 10.4.2002 passed in Sessions Trial No....

Dilip Singh @ Dilip Kumar Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : [2007(4)JCR499(Jhr)]

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. P.P.N. Roy

ORDERD.P. Singh, J.1. Heard Doth the sides.The learned Counsel for the petitioner, Dilip Singh, submitted that the petitioner is in custody in connection with Sakchi P.S. Case No. 189 of 2005 from 28.11.2006. The learned Counsel...

Falguni @ Anirudh Pradhan and ors. Vs. State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand)

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 313, 493 and 498A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 156(3)

Reported in : 2007CriLJ451; [2006(4)JCR231(Jhr)]

Advocate for Appellant : Manoj Prasad,; Chetan Krishan Nagesh and; Shabina Parvin

D.P. Singh, J.1. Appellant Falguni Pradhan and his parents stand convicted for the offence under Section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code and each sentenced to serve rigorous imprisonment for one year while appellant Falguni Pradhan...

Judhistir Mahato and Vs. the State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand)

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Explosive Substance Act- Sections 3 and 5; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 323 and 324

Reported in : 2007(1)BLJR367

Advocate for Appellant : A.K. Sahani,; N.K. Sahani and; A.K. Pandey, Advs.

D.P. Singh, J.1. Both the appellants stand convicted for the offence under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to serve rigorous imprisonment for seven years, and appellant No. 2 Parikhit Mahato stands further...

Judhistir Mahato and anr. Vs. State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand)

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : [2006(4)JCR622(Jhr)]

D.P. Singh, J.1. Both the appellants stand convicted for the offence under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to serve rigorous imprisonment for seven years, and appellant No. 2 Parikhit Mahato stands further...

Municipal Corporation of Delhi Vs. Rasal Singh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 33

Reported in : AIR1976SC2454; (1976)IILLJ96SC; (1976)2SCC179; 1976(8)LC275(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : D.P.Singh Sr. Adv.,; S.C. Agarwal,; V.J. Francis and;

V.R. Krishna Iyer, J.1. We are handling an extraordinary case-load of a hundred appeals by the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (the common appellant) against an award of the Industrial Tribunal, Delhi, granting 4 or 5 days...

Shiv Pal Singh and ors. Vs. Gaon Sabha

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1951 - Sections 18

Reported in : AIR1984All114

Advocate for Appellant : D.P. Singh, Adv.

N.N. Mithal, J. 1. The plaintiff has filed this appeal against the order of the lower appellate Court holding that the Civil Court had no jurisdiction to decide the suit and directing return of the plaint...

Kanchan Singh and anr. Vs. State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Lucknow ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 57 and 58(2)

Reported in : AIR1986All23

Advocate for Appellant : A.D. Saunders and ;D.P. Singh, Advs.

ORDERS.D. Agarwal, J. 1. This is a petition under Art 226 of the Constitution of India arising out of proceedings under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, hereinafter referred to as the Act. The two petitioners who...