Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: d p khare · Page 1 of about 8 results (0.069 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 12 1954

Kunj Behari and anr. Vs. Shia College, Lucknow and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-12-1954

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 39 and 39(1) - Order 41, Rule 5

Reported in : AIR1955All96

Advocate for Appellant : D.P. Khare, Adv.

Malik, C.J. 1. This case raises a very short point. There was a compromise decree obtainedby the Shia College against one Maiku Lal with respect to arrears of rent. This decree was obtained from the Court...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 13 1959

Lakshmiji Sugar Mills Co. Ltd., Maholi Vs. Banwari Lal Tandon

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-13-1959

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6, Rule 17 - Order 7, Rule 2 - Order 20, Rule 16; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 213; Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Articles 61 and 89

Reported in : AIR1959All546

Advocate for Appellant : D.P. Khare, Standing Counsel, ;B.K. Dhaon and ;A.P. Agarwal, Advs.

B.N. Nigam, J. 1. Banwari Lal Tandon filed regular suit No. 51 of 1951 against Messrs. The Lakshmiji Sugar Mills Co. Limited, Maholi, district Sitapur, claiming the following reliefs : (a) A decree for full and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 13 1958

Makhan Lal Marwari Vs. Audh Behari Lal

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-13-1958

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 10, 22, 25 and 32; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 18, Rule 5; Workmen's Compensation Rules - Rules 20(2) and 28

Reported in : AIR1959All586

Advocate for Appellant : D.P. Khare, Adv.

J.K. Tandon, J.1. This is an appeal under section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, against an order dated the 1st December, 1953, passed by the Commissioner under that Act and has arisen under the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 04 1955

Sunder Lal and anr. Vs. Jai NaraIn and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-04-1955

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 20 - Order 7, Rule 10

Reported in : AIR1955All669

Advocate for Appellant : D.P. Khare, Adv.

Randhir Singh, J. 1. This is an appeal from a judgment of theCivil Judge of Malihabad at Lucknow ordering the return of a plaint for presentation to the proper Court. 2. A suit was instituted by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 19 1951

Ram Lal Vs. Hindustan Commercial Bank Ltd.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-19-1951

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Uttar Pradesh (Temporary) Control of Rent and Eviction Act, 1947 - Sections 7B; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC)

Reported in : AIR1952All498

Advocate for Appellant : D.P. Khare and ;Shahid Husain, Advs.

Beg, J.1. This revision application has arisenout of proceedings under Section 7-B, Uttar Pradesh(Temporary) Control of Rent and Eviction Act,1947.2. An application under the said section was filed by the landlord opposite party against the tenant-applicant....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 28 1954

Nan Vs. Zamindar

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-28-1954

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Temporary Control of Rent and Eviction Act, 1947 - Sections 3 and 16

Reported in : AIR1954All587

Advocate for Appellant : D.P. Khare, Adv.

Beg, J.1. This is a defendant's appeal. It arises out of a suit brought by the plaintiff for arrears of rent and ejectment. The ejectment of the defendant was sought on the ground that the defendant...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 17 1956

Janki Prasad and ors. Vs. Kailash and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-17-1956

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 133 and 133(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 110 - Order 21, Rule 90

Reported in : AIR1956All735

Advocate for Appellant : Niamat-Ullah, ;D.P. Khare and ;G.B. Lal, Advs.

Randhir Singh, J.1. This is an application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court against the judgment of this Court, dated 12-8-1955.2. It appears that in execution of a money decree for Rs. 9,716/11/- a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 14 2004

Ramdas Jaiswal Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : May-14-2004

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 - Rule 44A; Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 7, 13(2) and 16

Reported in : 2004(3)MPHT303

Advocate for Appellant : Sanjeev Saxena, Adv.

ORDERA.K. Shrivastava, J. 1. The applicant has been convicted under Section 7/16 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 (in short 'the Act') and has been sentenced to suffer six months' simple imprisonment and fine of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial