Advanced Search Results

Chowaram Bachan Vs. Thanuram S/O Nathela Sahu and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 2(9) - Order 20, Rules 1,3 and 4(2); Madhya Pradesh (Civil) High Court Rules and Orders - Rule 1552

Reported in : AIR1960MP163

Advocate for Appellant : A.L. Halve, Adv.

Naik, J. 1. This civil revision has been referred to a Division Bench for decision at the instance of V.R. Sen. J. as it involves a point of general importance. The question that arises for consideration...

d.b Corp Ltd. Vs.d.p. Agrawal Publications Pvt. Ltd. & Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Rahul Malhotra

$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:20. h February, 2019 + CS (COMM) 1320/2016 D.B CORP LTD. Through: Mr. Rahul Malhotra, Advocate. ..... Plaintiff versus (M:9899218215) D.P. AGRAWAL PUBLICATIONS...

Babu Singh and anr. Vs. the Returning Officer for Elections and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Election

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Kshettra Samities (Election of Pramukhs and Up-Pramukhs and Settlement of Election Disputes) Rules, 1962 - Rule 24; ;Uttar Pradesh Kshettra Samities (Election of Pramukhs and Up-Pramukhs and Settlement of Election Disputes) (Amendment) Rules, 1973; Uttar Pradesh Kshettra Samities and Zilla Parishads Adhiniyam, 1961 - Sections 7 and 7(1)

Reported in : AIR1974All188

Advocate for Appellant : D.P. Agrawal, Adv.

ORDERK.N. Singh, J.1. In these two writ petitions validity of U.P. Kshettra Samities (Election of Pramukhs and Up-Pramukhs and Settlement of Election Disputes) (Second Amendment) Rules, 1973, as published in the Gazette dated 17th February, 1973...

Ram Rakshpal Vs. Amrit Dhara Pharmacy Ltd. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Contempt of Court

Reported in : AIR1954All691

Advocate for Appellant : D.P. Agrawal, Adv.

Raghubar Dayal, J. 1. This is an appeal under Chapter IX, rule 10, of the Rules of Court & Section 10 of the Letters Patent,read with Articles 225 and 372 of the Constitution of India. 2....

State of M.P. Vs. Smt. Sushila Bai Thakur

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 1 and 2(1)

Reported in : 2000ACJ1220; 1999(1)MPLJ597

Advocate for Appellant : D.P. Agrawal, Govt. Adv.

ORDERS.K. Dubey, J.1. This is an appeal under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 (for short 'the Act') against the order dated 23-7-1990 passed in Case No. 108/89(Fatal) by the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation...

Usv Ltd. Vs. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2007)106TTJ(Mum.)535

2. The first and second ground of objection by the assessee is directed against the order of the CIT(A) in confirming the disallowance of Rs. 3,79,876 in respect of employer's contribution and Rs. 4,05,635 in respect...

Smt. Neelam Agarwal Vs. Dy. Cit

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Lucknow

Subject : Direct Taxation

1. These are two appeals, one filed by the revenue and other by the assessee for the block period from 1-4-1989 to 18-8-1999. The grounds raised by the assessee are as under: 1. That the learned...

Mangal Ram and anr. Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 304B and 498A; Evidence Act - Sections 113B

Reported in : 1999(1)MPLJ505

Advocate for Appellant : Surendra Singh, Sr. Adv. and ;Karan Sher Singh, Adv.

V.K. Agrawal, J.1. Accused/appellants stand convicted under Sections 304B and 498A of the Indian Penal Code and have been sentenced as under : both the accused/appellants have been sentenced to undergo R.I. for seven years and...

Mangal Ram and anr. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 113B; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 304B and 498A

Reported in : 1999CriLJ4342

Advocate for Appellant : Surendra Singh, Sr. Adv. and ;Karan Sher Singh, Adv.

V.K. Agrawal, J.1. Accused/appellants stand convicted under Section 304B and 498A of the I.P.C. and have been sentenced as under: both the accused/appellants have been sentenced to undergo R. I. for seven years and to pay...

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Vardhman Polytex Ltd.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 28, 80HHC, 80HHC(1), 80HHC(2), 80HHC(3) 143(1), 143(3) and 288(2); Customs Act, 1962; Income Tax Law; Sales Tax Law

Reported in : (2006)203CTR(P& H)397; [2008]296ITR382(P& H)

Advocate for Appellant : N.L. Sharda, Adv.

1. This is an appeal by the Revenue, arising out of order dt. 16th Nov., 2004, passed by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Chandigarh Bench 'B', Chandigarh (for short the Tribunal') in ITA No. 458/Chd/2000, for the...