Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: d n vohra · Page 1 of about 76 results (0.071 seconds)

Apr 21 1999

Delhi Consumer Coopt. Wholesale Store Ltd. Vs. S.L.Thakural

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-21-1999

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2(S), 10 and 25 F, G

Reported in : 1999IVAD(Delhi)125; 79(1999)DLT644; 1999(50)DRJ79

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. D.N. Vohra, Advocat

ORDERK. Ramamoorthy, J.1. The petitioner, management, has challenged the award of the Labour Court dated 21.7.1995 by which the Labour Court had directed the reinstatement of the workman with full backwages. The question referred to the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 22 2002

Mideast India Ltd. Vs. Shri K.M. Unni and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-22-2002

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 17B and 25F; Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 15, 16, 16(1), 22, 33C and 33C(2); Negotiable Instruments Act - Sections 138

Reported in : [2003]115CompCas184(Delhi); 2002(62)DRJ537; [2002(94)FLR1059]; (2002)IIILLJ971Del

Advocate for Appellant : D.N. Vohra, Adv

Manmohan Sarin, J.1. C.M. No. 2644/2000 is an application moved by the workman under Section 17-B of the Industrial Disputes Act (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). An award was passed by the Presiding Officer, Labour...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 09 1972

Management of Municipal Corporation of Delhi Vs. the Presiding Officer ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-09-1972

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : ILR1972Delhi653; (1973)ILLJ378Del

Advocate for Appellant : D.N. Vohra and; Madan Bhatia, Advs

S. Rangarajan, J.(1) Five questions arise for consideration in this Letters Patnent Appeal from the judgment of the learned single Judge of this Court: (1)What are the limits of interference by the High Court under Articles...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Try free for 7 days How AI Brief works

Dec 15 1972

Delhi Transport Corporation Vs. Delhi Administration and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-15-1972

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : [1973(27)FLR363]; 1973LabIC1290; (1973)IILLJ307Del

Advocate for Appellant : S.N. Bhandari,; O.K. Sharma and; D.N. Vohra, Advs

V.S. Deshpande, J. (1) The award of the Labour Court (Respondent 2) on a reference under section 10(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 made by the Delhi Administration (Respondent No.1) directing the reinstatement of Sadhu...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 16 2003

Mr. Vijender Singh S/O Shri Sarup Singh Vs. Delhi Transport Corporatio ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-16-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : Disability Act

Reported in : 2003VAD(Delhi)606; 105(2003)DLT261; 2003(69)DRJ641; 2004(1)SLJ86(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : D.N. Vohra Adv

Vijender Jain, J. 1. Rule. 2. The petitioner was appointed as conducted in the year 1984. On 14.2.1993, petitioner met with an accident causing loss of his right hand and was unable to perform the duties...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 14 1995

Pearey Lal Vs. O.P. Singla

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-14-1995

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10

Reported in : 1995IVAD(Delhi)380; 60(1995)DLT305; 1996(36)DRJ180

Advocate for Appellant : L.D. Adlakha,; Ripu Adlakha,; D.N. Vohra and ;

Vijender Jain, J. (1) This is a petition filed by the petitioner against the award passed by the Labour Court dated 9.7.1982(2) MR.L.D Adalkha, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, has argued that award suffers from...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 07 2000

Delhi Transport Corporation Vs. Delhi Administration and Others.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-07-2000

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 - Sections 2 and 7(1)

Reported in : 2000(53)DRJ314

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. S.N. Bhandari,; Ms. Geeta Sharma and; Mr. D.N. Vohra

ORDERA.K. Sikri, J. 1. Civil writ petition No. 439 of 1990 is filed by Delhi Transport Corporation (hereinafter referred to as DTC, for short). In this writ petition DTC challenges the award dated 3rd May, 1989...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 07 2000

Khem Chand Vs. S.K. Sarvaria and Another

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-07-2000

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 32 and 226; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2(S)

Reported in : 2000(55)DRJ60

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. D.N. Vohra, Adv

ORDERA.K. Sikri, J.1. This petition raises short but interesting point of rest judicata or right to raise industrial dispute by the petitioner-workman after his writ petition challenging the same action was dismissed by this Court. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 18 1998

Kamal Kumar Vs. J.P.S. Malik, Presiding Officer, Labour Court and Othe ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-18-1998

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India, 1950 - Articles 226 and 227; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2

Reported in : 1998VAD(Delhi)518; 73(1998)DLT611; 1998(45)DRJ530; [1998(79)FLR965]; (1998)119PLR58

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. D.N. Vohra, Adv

Dr. M.K. Sharma, J.1. The present writ petition is directed against the award dated 31.1.1996 passed by the Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Tis Hazari, Delhi, holding that the petitioner does not come within the purview of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 11 2005

S.P. Thukral Vs. Delhi Development Authority

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-11-2005

Subject : Service

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 7, 13(1) and 13(2); Delhi Development Authority Conduct, Disciplinary and Appeal Regulations, 1999 - Regulations 20(2), 22 and 23

Reported in : 123(2005)DLT123; 2005(84)DRJ49; [2005(107)FLR386]

Advocate for Appellant : D.N. Vohra, Adv

S. Ravindra Bhat, J.1. The petitioner is aggrieved by an order dated 13.06.2002 by which respondent (hereafter called DDA) decided that the period of his suspension shall be counted only for pensionary benefits and that the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

Try free for 7 days

‹ Prev
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Next ›
Last »

Advanced Search Results

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.