Advanced Search Results
Dhanraj Mills Ltd. Vs. B.K. Kocher and anr.
Mumbai
Feb-28-1951
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226
AIR1951Bom132; (1951)53BOMLR393; ILR1952Bom335
D.N. Pritt and ;S.A. Desai, Advs.
Chagla, C.J.1. The petition from which this appeal arises is an entirely hopeless one & Mr. Pritt with all his ingenuity has tried to make it as presentable as possible. The petitioners are the Dhanraj Mills...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSohrabji Dhunjibhoy Medora and Another Vs. the Oriental Government Sec ...
Privy Council
Oct-10-1945
Insurance
F.A. Sellers and D.A. Scott Cairns, for Appellants; D.N. Pritt, Sir Thomas Strangman and R.T.J. Gibson, for Respondents. Solicitors for Appellants, Gregory Boiucliffe and Co.; Solicitors for Respondents Lattey and Dawe.
Sir John Beaumont: This is an appeal from a decree dated 18th November 1943, made by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in its appellate jurisdiction affirming a decree dated 14th April 1943, of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskWinnipeg Electric Co. Vs. Jacob Geel
Privy Council
Jul-27-1932
MRTP
D.N. Pritt and E.H. Coleman, for Appellants; Newcombe and E.R. Chapman, for Respondent. Solicitors for Appellants, Blake and Redden; Solicitors for Respondent, Maunde and Tunnicliffe.
Lord Wright: In this case the respondent who was plaintiff in the action was awarded by a jury the sum of $11,15825 as damages for personal injuries sustained by him by reason of the negligence of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Pakala Narayana Swami Vs. Emperor
Privy Council
Jan-20-1939
Criminal
D.N. Pritt and H.W. Williams, for Appellant ; G.D. Roberts, W. Wallach and J. Megaw, for Respondent. Solicitors for Appellants, Hy. S.L. Polak and Co. ; Solicitors for Respondent, Solicitor, India Office.
Lord Atkin: This is an appeal by special leave from a judgment of the High Court of Patna who affirmed the decision of the Sessions Judge at Berhampur who had convicted the appellant of the murder...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPulukuri Kottaya and Others Vs. Emperor
Privy Council
Dec-19-1946
Criminal
D.N. Pritt and R.K. Handoo, for Appellants; John Megaw, for the Crown. Solicitors for Appellants, Barrow Rogers and Nevill; Solicitors for Crown; Solicitor, India Office.
Sir John Beaumont: This is an appeal by special leave against the judgment and order of the High Court of Judicature at Madras, dated 22-10-1945, dismissing an appeal against the judgment and order of the Court...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMian Saleh Mohammad Shah Vs. Sayyad Zawar HussaIn Shah and Another
Privy Council
Nov-22-1943
Land Acquisition
D.N. Pritt and R.K. Handoo, for Appellant; J.M. Pringle, for Respondents. Solicitors for Appellant, Hy. S.L. Polak and Co., Solicitors for Respondents, Hardcastle Sanders and Co.
Sir George Rankin: In this consolidated appeal the question is whether the appellant on the death in 1934 of his mother's sister, Sat Bharai, became entitled to the whole of certain extensive immovable properties in the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDalsukh M. Pancholi Vs. the Guarantee Life and Employment Insurance Co ...
Privy Council
Apr-24-1947
Land Acquisition
AIR1947PC182
D.N. Pritt and W. Wallach, for Appellant; Sir Thomas Strongman, Sir Valentine Holmes P.V. Subba Row and H. J. Umrigar, for Respondents. Solicitors for Appellant, T.L. Wilson and Co.; Solicitors for Respondents, Hy. S.L. Polak and Co.
Sir Madhavan Nair: This is an appeal by the plaintiff-appellant against a judgment and decree of the High Court of Judicature at Lahore, dated 29th March 1944, which reversed a decree of the Court of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSohan Singh Vs. Governor-general in Council
Privy Council
Jun-17-1947
Land Acquisition
AIR1947PC178
D.N. Pritt, R.K. Handoo and B. Sen , for Appellant; J. Millard Tucker, B. Mackenna and D.A. Grant, for Respondent. Solicitors for Appellant, Hy. S.L. Polak and Co.; Solicitors for Respondent, Solicitor, India Office.
Sir John Beaumont: This is an appeal from a decree of the High Court of Judicature at Lahore, dated 30-9-1943, varying a decree of the Court of the District Judge of Rawalpindi, dated 15-5-1941. The appeal...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAntonio Dias Caldeira Vs. Frederick Augustus Gray
Privy Council
Feb-14-1936
Land Acquisition
AIR1936PC154
D.N. Pritt and Ronald Smith, for Appellant; J.H. Wallington and Reginald J. White, for Respondent. Solicitors for Appellant, Druces and Attlee; Solicitors for Respondent, Daphnee.
LORD ALNESS: In this case the respondent, who is a sales manager, sued the appellant, who is a doctor, for damages. The claim was based on negligence. The respondent was treated for malaria by the appellant,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPunjab Province Vs. Daulat Singh and Others
Privy Council
Jan-30-1946
Land Acquisition
D.N. Pritt and J.M. Pringle, for Appellant; R.F. Roxburgh and M.G. Hewins, for Respondents. Solicitors for Appellant, Solicitor, India Office; Solicitors for Respondent 1, Linklaters and Paines.
Lord Thankerton: This is an appeal from the judgment and order of the Federal Court of India, dated 8th May 1942 by which the judgment and decree of the High Court of Judicature at Lahore, dated...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Next ›
- Last »