Advanced Search Results

Sarv Rural and Urban Welfare Society Vs. Union of India .

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : D. N. Goburdhan

1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.1085 OF2013BIR SINGH ….APPELLANT(S) VERSUS DELHI JAL BOARD & ORS. ….RESPONDENT(S) CIVIL APPEAL NO(S) 9935­9937 OF2014WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).10081 OF2014CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 8141...

Bir Singh Vs. Delhi Jal Board .

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : D. N. Goburdhan

1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.1085 OF2013BIR SINGH ….APPELLANT(S) VERSUS DELHI JAL BOARD & ORS. ….RESPONDENT(S) CIVIL APPEAL NO(S) 9935­9937 OF2014WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).10081 OF2014CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 8141...

Laxminath Vs. The State of Chhattisgarh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Advocate for Appellant : D. N. Goburdhan

NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.331 OF2011LAXMINATH APPELLANT(S) VERSUS STATE OF CHHATTISGARH RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT DEEPAK GUPTA, J.This appeal by the accused is directed against the judgment of the High...

Satbeer Singh Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Panel Code - Sections 328, 363, 366 and 376

Reported in : 114(2004)DLT487

Advocate for Appellant : D.N. Goburdhan and; Amit Sharma, Advs

Pradeep Nandrajog, J.1. 4 persons, Suresh Kumar, Azad Singh, Kukku and Satbir Singh were the accused in Sessions Case No.448/1988, arising out of FIR NO. 96/85 dated 6.5.1985, P.S.Najafgarh. Azad Singh and Kukkoo died during trial....

K.S. Chauhan (Col.) Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2000IVAD(Delhi)126; 84(2000)DLT866; 2000(56)DRJ755

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. D.N. Goburdhan, Adv

ORDERK. Ramamoorthy, J.1. The petitioner has challenged the order dated 26.12.1995 passed by the fourth respondent imposing severe displeasure and the order passed by the Government of India dated 20.6.96 confirming the same. The petitioner was...

D.N. Kalia Vs. R.N. Kalia

Court : Delhi

Subject : Property

Acts : Transfer of Property Act; The Benami Transactions(Prohibition) Act,1988 - Section 4(1)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. D.N. Goburdhan, Adv.

1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?(No)2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?(Yes)3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest?(Yes) 1. The present appeal is filed...

Hiya Associates Vs. Nakshatra Properties Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : D. N. Goburdhan

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL Nos. 9996­9997 OF2018[Arising out of SLP (C) Nos.23260­23261 of 2017]. Hiya Associates & Ors. .. Appellant(s) Versus Nakshatra Properties Pvt. Ltd. .. Respondent(s) JUDGMENT...

Rabindra Mahto and anr. Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 141, 149, 302 and 323; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 156, 157, 159 and 174

Reported in : AIR2006SC887; 2006(1)ALD(Cri)261; 2006(1)BLJR125; 2006CriLJ957; 2006(3)CTC512; JT2006(1)SC137; 2006(1)SCALE182; (2006)10SCC432

Advocate for Appellant : D.N. Goburdhan,; C.K. Sucharita,; A.C. Manish Mohan,;

P.P. Naolekar, J.1. Leave granted in S.L.P. (Crl.) No. 2218 of 20052. The accused appellants were convicted and sentenced by the Additional Judicial Commissioner. The appellants Rabindra Mahto, Balram Mahto and Lemboo Mahto were found guilty...

Rajiv Bhatia Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : FamilyConstitution

Acts : Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act - Sections 16

Reported in : AIR1999SC3284; 1999(2)ALD(Cri)506; 2000(1)ALT(Cri)63; 1999CriLJ4292; JT1999(6)SC523; 1999(5)SCALE414; (1999)8SCC525; [1999]Supp2SCR280

Advocate for Appellant : D.N. Goburdhan,; Pinkay Anand and; Geeta Luthra, Advs;

G.B. Pattanaik, J. 1. Leave granted.2. These appeals by grant of special leave are directed against the judgment dated 11.3.99 by the Division Bench of the Delhi High Court in a writ of habeas corpus filed...

Javed Abdul Razzaq Shaikh Vs. The State of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Advocate for Appellant : D. N. Goburdhan

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1181 OF2011JAVED ABDUL RAJJAQ SHAIKH ... APPELLANT VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ... RESPONDENT JUDGMENT K.M. JOSEPH, J.1. The appellant, calls in question, his conviction...