Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: d n bhattacharjee · Page 1 of about 16 results (0.246 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 03 1931

Profulla Kumar Sarkar and ors. Vs. Emperor

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-03-1931

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1931Cal401

Rankin, C.J.1. By Section 154, Evidence Act, it is provided that:the Court may in its discretion permit the parson who calls a witness to put any questions to him which might be put in cross-examination by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 23 1976

Krishan Lal Vs. Sh. Ghaniya and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-23-1976

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1977CriLJ1361

ORDERChet Ram Thadur, J.1. This petition Under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 (for short, the Code) and under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by Krishan Lal for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 02 1992

Nirlon Synthetic Fibers and Chemicals Limited Vs. Bakulbala Das

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Sep-02-1992

Subject : SICA

Acts : Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Section 22(3), 22(3)(4) and 22(4); ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Section 115

Reported in : (1994)1CALLT36(HC),97CWN490

Advocate for Appellant : M.L. Bhattacharjee, ;A.K. Ghosal, ;S. Mitra and ;D.N. Bhattacharjee, Advs.

Samir Kumar Mookherjee, J.1. The present Revisional application is directed against Order No. 60' dated 3rd of July, 1992 passed by the learned Assistant District Judge, 9th Court, Alipore in Title Suit No. 84 of 1988....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 28 1953

Shiva Behari Vs. State

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-28-1953

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 62 and 106

Reported in : AIR1954All255; (1954)ILLJ449All

Advocate for Appellant : D.N. Bhattacharjee, Adv.

ORDERRandhir Singh, J.1. The applicant in this case has been convicted under Section 92 of the Factories Act, 1948, for having contravened the provisions of Section 62 of the Factories Act.2. It appears that one Sri...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 23 1999

Dr. A.K. Bhattacharjee, Adv. Vs. Shyamal Nag Alias Ranjan Nag and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Mar-23-1999

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 192, 200, 202, 202(1), 203, 204, 249, 256 and 482

Advocate for Appellant : Parti-in-person

A.K. Patnaik, J.1. This is a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, against the order dated 31-12-96 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kamrup, Guwahati, in complaint case No. 1014 (C) of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 20 1989

Charanjit Singh Vs. Assistant Collector of Central Excise

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-20-1989

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2, 9, 9(1), 9A, 9C, 9AA, 9AA(1), 18, 19, 20 and 21; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 173G

Reported in : 1990(47)ELT352(Bom)

1. By this Petition under Section 452 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the original accused Nos. 4 and 5 in case No. 433/S of 1987 of the Court of the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Bombay,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 06 2009

A.P. Civil Liberties Committee (Apclc) Rep. by Its President, Mr. S. S ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-06-2009

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Right to Information Act (RTI), 2005 - Sections 6, 6(3), 8(1) and 19; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 1, 21, 25, 81, 105, 123, 145 and 157; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25 and 27; Explosive Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 5; APPS - Sections 8; Commission of Inquiries Act, 1962; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 106, 106(2) and 155; Gold (Control) Act, 1968 - Sections 108; Ku Klux Klan Act, 1871; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 6, 34, 52A, 76 to 106, 135, 147, 148, 149, 201, 202, 203, 204, 216, 217, 221, 299, 300, 302, 304, 304A, 307, 332, 408, 420, 452, 499, 500 and 506; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2, 37, 39, 40, 41, 43, 46, 46(1), 46(2), 46(3), 129 to 132, 132(1), 132, 132(2), 133, 134, 149, 151, 152, 153(3), 154, 154(1), 154(2), 154(3), 155, 156, 156(1), 156(3), 1

Reported in : 2009(1)ALT754

Advocate for Appellant : Bojja Tarakam, Sr. Counsel, ;D. Suresh Kumar, ;K. Balagopal, ;K.G. Kannabiran, Sr. Counsel, ;V. Raghunath, ;Balla Ravindranath and ;Kolla Savithri Devi, Advs.;C. Padmanabha Reddy, Sr. Counsel

ORDERGoda Raghuram, J.Competing interpretations of recurrent-contemporaneous events:1. Since the inception of the naxalite movement in Andhra Pradesh in 1969, 551 police personnel were killed including one DIG, two S.Ps, five D.S.Ps; 16 Inspectors and 49 Sub-Inspectors....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 22 1972

D.N. Bhattacharjee and ors. Vs. State of West Bengal and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-22-1972

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1972SC1607; 1972CriLJ1037; (1972)3SCC414; [1972]3SCR973; 1972(4)LC823(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : C.K. Daphtary and; D.N. Mukherjee, Advs

M.H. Beg, J.1. On 11.7.1963 Sunilakshva Choudhry a Director of the Metropolitan Industrial Corporation Ltd., Calcutta, having been authorised by its Board of Directors, filed a complaint against the appellant Debendra Nath Bhattacharjee (or Bhattacharya), a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 06 1984

In Re: Gluco Series Pvt. Ltd. and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jun-06-1984

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 193, 397 and 398

Reported in : [1987]61CompCas227(Cal)

Dipak Kumar Sen, J.1. Debendra Nath Bhattacharya, since deceased, and Deb Kanta Roy were the promoters of Gluco Series P. Ltd. (hereafter referred to as 'the company') which was incorporated on November 11, 1959. At the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 19 1984

Subir Roy and anr. Vs. S.K. Chattopadhyay and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Nov-19-1984

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Section 132, 132(1) and 132(8)

Reported in : [1986]158ITR472(Cal)

Advocate for Appellant : Goutam Chakraborty, Adv.

Mrs. Padma Khastgir, J.1. The petitioners, Subir Roy and Goutam Roy, had moved the writ jurisdiction of this court being aggrieved by the search and seizure stated to have been made illegally and arbitrarily by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial