Advanced Search Results
Shaniwar Dhondu Dharnekar Vs. Prabhavati Chandrakant Patange and anr.
Mumbai
Apr-18-1979
Tenancy
Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 - Sections 14, 25(1) and 25(2); Constitution of India - Article 227
AIR1980Bom276; (1980)82BOMLR104; 1979MhLJ836
G.V. Limaye, Adv.
ORDER1. Respondent No. 1 is the landlady of Survey No. 47 admeasuring 22 acres and 2 gunthas plus 2 acres Pot Kharab and survey No. 17 admeasuring 33 gunthas situated at village Akorli in Panvel taluka...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskN. Venkatrao and anr. Vs. Kishatanna
Mumbai
Jul-05-1973
PropertyContract
Hyderabad Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950 - Sections 38 and 38-A
AIR1974Bom258; (1974)76BOMLR186; 1974MhLJ400
D.M. Parulekar, Adv. for ;B.S. Deshmukh, Adv.
ORDER1. This is a revisional application under Section 115 of C.P. C., 1908. The respondent filed a suit against the petitioners herein in the Court of the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Nanded, being Regular Civil Suit...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKeshav Vithal Mhatre Vs. Arvind Ranchhod Parekh and anr.
Mumbai
Jul-27-1972
Tenancy
Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 - Sections 4, 61, 88(1) and 90; Bombay Revenue Code, 1875 - Sections 83
AIR1974Bom94; (1973)75BOMLR694; ILR1974Bom114; 1973MhLJ958
D.M. Parulekar and ;B.M. Purandare, Advs.
ORDER1. The petitioner in the above Special Civil Application became the tenant of the lands in dispute under a lease for ten years granted by the Manager appointed under Section 65 of the Bombay Tenancy and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Shantabai Ramchandra Ghatge and ors. Vs. Pandurang Ramchandra Mandlik ...
Mumbai
Mar-27-1972
Tenancy
Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 - Sections 2(18), 4, 70 and 74
AIR1973Bom203; (1973)75BOMLR79
D.M. Parulekar and ;M.R. Kotwal, Advs.
1. The dispute in this appeal relates to four lands Survey No. 1442/2 admeasuring 3 acres 4 gunthas assessed at Rs. 20-7-0, Survey No. 1445/2 admeasuring 1 acre and 1/2 guntha assessed at Rs. 7-4-0, Survey...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVithal Maruti Vs. State
Mumbai
Feb-27-1952
CriminalConstitution
Bombay Beggars Act, 1945 - Sections 5, 5(1), 5(4), 5(5), 6, 6(1), 6(3), 20, 23 and 23(1); Constitution of India - Article 15
AIR1952Bom451; (1952)54BOMLR626; ILR1953Bom51
D.M. Parulekar, Adv.
Vyas, J.[1] This is an appeal by one Vithal son of Maruti who has been convicted by the learned Presidency Magistrate, nth Court, Kurla, Bombay under Section 5, Sub-section (5), read with Section 6, Sub-section (3),...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMadhav Raoji Vs. State
Mumbai
Feb-08-1952
Motor VehiclesCriminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 246; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 89, 112, 115, 116 and 131
AIR1952Bom385; (1952)54BOMLR433; ILR1952Bom1100
S.S. Kavalekar, ;D.M. Parulekar and ;V.N. Talpade, Advs. ;R. Jethmalani and ;B.K. Hirani, Advs.
ORDER(1) The case for the prosecution was that the accused was driving a station wagon on May 28, 1951, at the island around Wellington Fountain opposite the Regal Cinema, and he caused injury to a pedestrian....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShri Ramtanu Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of M ...
Supreme Court of India
Aug-05-1970
Constitution
Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 246; Land Acquisition Act, 1894;
AIR1970SC1771; (1970)3SCC323; [1971]1SCR719
D.M. Parulekar and; A.G. Ratnaparkhi, Advs. in W.P. No. 182 of 1969;
A.N. Ray, J.1. These petitioners raise two principal questions. First, whether the State of Maharashtra (hereinafter referred to as the State) is competent to enact the Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›