Advanced Search Results
Sk. Aftab HusaIn and anr. Vs. Smt. Tayabba Begam and anr.
Allahabad
Jan-05-1972
FamilyProperty
Muhammadan Law
AIR1973All54
H.N. Tilhari, Adv. holding brief for ;D.K. Trivedi, Adv.
Om Prakash Trivedi, J. 1. This is a defendants' second appeal and arises from the judgment and decree dated 21-8-1962 passed by the District Judge, Sitapur, upholding the judgment and decree of the Civil Judge, Sitapur....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Gujarat Vs. Dinesh Chandra Harjibhai Patel
Gujarat
Mar-22-1993
Criminal
Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 19(1), 92 and 94
1994CriLJ1393; (1993)2GLR1108
D.K. Trivedi, Public Prosecutor
ORDERK.J. Vaidya, J.1. 'Whether any accused hopefully expecting that he would be let-off with the lighter sentence, and accordingly in the process while pleading guilty, he also cleverly puts forward some more facts and circumstances either...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Gujarat Vs. Devji Bechar
Gujarat
Jan-11-1991
Property
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 6 and 23
AIR1991Guj187; (1991)2GLR736
D.K. Trivedi, Govt. Pleader
J.U. Mehta, J.1. The State of Gujarat who is the original opponent No. 1 has filed this appeal against the award passed by the learned Assistant Judge, Bhavnagar in Land Reference Case No. 1 of 1976...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
State of Gujarat and ors. Vs. Kathi Malsiya Vaghe
Gujarat
Jun-28-1991
Property
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 23
AIR1992Guj79
D.K. Trivedi, Incharge Govt. Pleader
Jani, J.1. Sixteen First Appeals Nos.994/82 to 1008/82 and No. 1015/82 under S. 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, filed by the State of Gujarat arise from a common judgment and different awards delivered by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State of Gujarat Vs. Uttam Bhikhu Prajapati
Gujarat
Aug-10-1990
CriminalConstitution
Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 - Sections 65, 66(1) and 81; Prevention of Corruption Act; Constitution of India - Article 21
1992CriLJ626; (1990)2GLR1244
D.K. Trivedi, A.P.P.
K.J. Vaidya, J.1. This appeal for the enhancement of the sentence arises out of the judgment and order dated 27th April, 1981, rendered in Summary Case No. 4295/80 passed by the learned J.M.F.C. Bulsar, wherein the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Gujarat Vs. Sthanakvasi JaIn Mota Sangh and ors.
Gujarat
Jul-25-1990
Labour and Industrial
Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 18 and 22; Gujarat Minimum Wages Rules, 1961; Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1948 - Sections 2(4)
(1992)1GLR19; (1995)IIILLJ519Guj
D.K. Trivedi, Adv.
Vaidya, J. 1. The question of importance that arises for consideration in these two acquittal appeals is 'whether the provisions of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 (for short 'the Act') and the Rules made thereunder, viz....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Gujarat Vs. Gulamnabi Alias Fakir Mohmad and anr.
Gujarat
Aug-09-1989
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 350; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 453, 114, 506 and 506(2)
1990CriLJ2245; (1990)1GLR60
D.K. Trivedi, Addl. Public Prosecutor and; K.R. Vyas, Adv.
K.J. Vaidya, J. 1. The controversy in this acquittal appeal is -- who is responsible for acquittal of two accused? The prosecution Agency for 'want of prosecution' as held by the trial Court? Or the trial...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Gujarat and anr. Vs. Mulchand Lakhansinh Shah
Gujarat
Aug-07-1989
Criminal
Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3, 6B, 6B(1), 6C and 6C(2); Essential Commodities (Licensing and Stock Declaration) Order, 1981
1990CriLJ2399; (1990)1GLR195
D.K. Trivedi, Addl. Public Prosecutor
ORDERK.J. Vaidya, J.1. The above Special Criminal Application arises out of the judgment and order dated, 13th May, 1981, rendered in Criminal Appeal No. 14 of 1982 by the learned Sessions Judge, Valsad, (hereinafter for short...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCoromandel Mining and Exports Pvt. Ltd. and Others Vs. Union of India ...
Andhra Pradesh
Sep-11-2015
Land Acquisition
Common Judgment: (Dilip B. Bhosale, ACJ.) 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Rule. By consent of learned counsel heard forthwith. 2. Principally, two prayers have been made in these petitions, first, to declare that Sections...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Gujarat Vs. T.J. Patel
Gujarat
Dec-19-1991
Service
(1992)1GLR567
C.K. Thakker, J.1. This group of 102 petitions is filed by the State of Gujarat against orders passed by the Gujarat Civil Services Tribunal in Appeal Nos. 439 of 1982 and others on October 13, 1983...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »