Advanced Search Results

Nanaji S/O Ganuji Bhokre Vs. Commissioner, Amravati Division, Amravati ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : ElectionTrusts and Societies

Acts : Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 -Sections 2(14), 73-FF, 144T and 152-A; Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1988; Constitution of India - Article 226; Indian Partnership Act, 1932

Reported in : AIR1994Bom204; 1994(4)BomCR364; 1994(2)MhLj1277

Advocate for Appellant : D.K. Deshmukh

ORDER1. The petitioner herein challenges the order passed by the Commissioner, Amravati Division, Amravati whereby the Commissioner dismissed the appeal filed by the petitioner against the order rejecting the nomination paper of the petitioner. The petitioner...

Gunwant Bhagwan Wakode Vs. Madhuri Gunwant Wakode

Court : Mumbai

Subject : FamilyCriminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 125, 397 and 482; Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : I(1992)DMC275

Advocate for Appellant : D.K. Deshmukh, Adv.

D.J. Moharir, J.1. This Revision Application under Section 397 of the Criminal Procedure Code is directed against the order of the Additional Sessions Judge, Yavatmal passed in Criminal Revision Application No. 155/88. The petitioner Gunwant Bhagwan...

Gaurang V. Merchant and ors. Vs. Madhliso and Co. Pvt. Ltd. and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CivilLimitation

Reported in : 2004(2)ALLMR737; 2004(5)BomCR700; (2004)106BOMLR153

D.G. Karnik, J.1. This motion is taken out by the defendant Nos. 3 and 4 for setting aside an ex parte decree dated 18th December, 2001 passed by this Court in Suit No. 334 of 1982....

Godrej Sara Lee Limited Vs. Knight Queen Industries Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Reported in : 2007(34)PTC364(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : V.V. Tulzapurkar and ;Salil Shah, Advs., i/b., Gajaria & Co.

D.K. Deshmukh, J.1. The learned Counsel appearing for the Defendant has placed on record two labels, which are taken on record and marked 'X' and 'Y' for identification. The learned Counsel appearing for the Defendant, without...

New Era Shipping Ltd. and Hatimi Steels Vs. M.V.P. Express and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Admiralty Courts Act, 1840; Admiralty Courts Act, 1861 - Sections 25, 33 and 35; Brussels Arrest Convention Act, 1852; Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 - Sections 3(55); Major Port Trusts Act, 1963; Indian Ports Act, 1908 - Sections 3(7); Colonial Courts of Admiralty Act, 1890 - Sections 2(2); Supreme Court Act, 1981; Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act, 1982; Customs Act; General Clauses Act; Bombay High Court (Original Sides) Rules - Rules 941 and 949; Supreme Court Rules, 1965 - Rules 4(3) and 11 - Orders 7 and 75

Reported in : 2008(1)ALLMR556; 2007(6)BomCR138; (2007)109BOMLR1875

Advocate for Appellant : Sunip Sen and ;V.U. Seth, Advs., i/b., ;Ashwin Shankar, Adv.

S.C. Dharmadhikari, J.1. This chamber summons and the notice of motion in this Admiralty Suit can be disposed of by a common order, inasmuch as they were heard together so also similar contentions were canvassed by...

Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. Vs. Western Geco International Lt ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Income Tax Act - Sections 44BB; Contract Act - Sections 72; Arbitration and Conciliation Act - Sections 28(3)

Reported in : 2006(4)ARBLR18(Bom); II(2006)BC550; 2006(3)BomCR848; [2006]132CompCas145(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : D.R. Zaiwala, ;P.A. Sawant and ;Prakash Shinde, Advs., i/b., M. Dhruva & Co.

D.K. Deshmukh, J.1. By this Petition the Petitioner challenges the award made by the arbitral tribunal dated 4-2-2005 directing the Petitioner to pay to the Respondent a sum of US$ 2,936,607.82 (USD two million, nine hundred...

Franco Indian Research Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Unichem Laboratories Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Intellectual Property RightsCivil

Acts : Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 28 and 29; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : 2005(30)PTC131(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : V.V. Tulzapurkar, Adv., i/b., V.S. Hegde and ;M.A. Mahadgut, Advs.

D.K. Deshmukh, J. 1. This notice of motion is taken out by the plaintiffs. By this notice of motion, the plaintiffs seek various interim reliefs to restrain the defendants from using the word mark 'EVACAL' in...

Pune Cantonment Board Vs. Regional Labour Commissioner and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 - Sections 1(3), 2 and 4; Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972

Reported in : 2007(3)ALLMR166; [2007(114)FLR989]; (2007)IILLJ609Bom; 2007(1)MhLj458

Advocate for Appellant : V.G. Mujumdar, Adv.

Nishita Mhatre, J.1. The issue which arises in this writ petition is whether the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 is applicable to the Pune Cantonment Board and whether it is bound to pay gratuity under that...

Mr. Puneet Malhotra and anr. Vs. Mr. R.S. Gai, Sole Arbitrator and ors ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : ArbitrationCivil

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 2, 20, 21, 34, 34(1), 34(2), 37, 37(1), 75, 81, 85 and 85(2); Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959 - Schedule - Articles 1, 3, 13 and 18; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 2, 30 and 33; General Clauses Act - Sections 8 and 8(1); Foreign Awards (Recognition and Enforcement) Act, 1961; Arbitration (Protocol and Convention) Act, 1937; Contract Act - Sections 28

Reported in : AIR2009Bom42; 2008(6)ALLMR856; 2008(4)ARBLR398(Bom); 2008(6)BomCR551; 2008BusLR40(Bom); 2008(6)MhLj867:2009(2)AIRKarR55(F.B).

Advocate for Appellant : S.S. Kanetkar, Adv. in Writ Petition No. 4064 of 2008, R.D. Dhanuka, ;R. Yadav, ;R.Y. Shirsekar and ;H.C. Pimple, Advs. in Arbitration Petition No. 340 and 341 of 2007 and Arbitration Petition (L) No.

D.K. Deshmukh, J.1. This bench has been constituted by the Hon'ble The Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court for answering the following question:When a petition is filed challenging an Award under Section 34 of the...

inventa Fischer Gmbh and Co. Vs. Polygenta Technologies Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 34, 44 and 48(1); International Cricket Council Rules; Constitution of India - Article 141

Reported in : 2005(2)ARBLR125(Bom); 2005(2)BomCR364

Advocate for Appellant : D.D. Dave, Sr.C., ;Shirish, ;Trupti Kapadia and ;Joshi, Advs., i/b., Joy Legal

Dharmadhikari S.C., J. 1. This petition is filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short 1996 Act) to challenge an award dated 21st October, 2003 passed by International Court of Arbitration...