Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: d k de · Page 1 of about 34 results (0.349 seconds)

Jun 07 1973

Jamshed Framroze Kalyanvala Vs. Mrs. Zerina Jamshed Kalyanvala

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jun-07-1973

Subject : Family

Acts : Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936 - Sections 47 and 49

Reported in : AIR1974Cal111,77CWN1044

Advocate for Appellant : Sankardas Banerjee, ;D.K. De and ;Ajay N. Ray, Advs.

S.K. Datta, J.1. This is an appeal against the order of Salil Kumar Roy Chowdhury, J., dated March 30, 1973 on the application of the husband under Section 49 of the Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 24 1977

B.K. Dhar Pvt. Limited Vs. Calcutta Metropolitan Development Authority

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jun-24-1977

Subject : Contract

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1977Cal379

Advocate for Appellant : D.K. De, Adv.

ORDERDipak Kumar Sen, J.1. The facts which are not in dispute in these proceedings may shortly be stated as follows :--On or about the 18th Oct. 1974, the Calcutta Metropolitan Development Authority incorporated under the Calcutta...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 12 1980

Munda Builders Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jun-12-1980

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Section 30

Reported in : AIR1980Cal278

Advocate for Appellant : D.K. De and ;Ranjan Dutta, Advs.

ORDERSalil K. Roy Chowdhary, J.1. This is an application for setting aside the award dated the 22nd of September, 1978. The petitioner entered into a contract dated the 25th of January, 1965, with the defendant represented...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Try free for 7 days How AI Brief works

Feb 23 1970

Prem Nath Khandelwal Vs. Assistant Controller of Estate Duty

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-23-1970

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Estate Duty Act, 1953 - Section 70; ;Finance Act, 1894 - Sections 6(6) and 8(9); ;Indian Law

Reported in : [1970]77ITR949(Cal)

Advocate for Appellant : D.K. De, Adv.

Banerjee, J. 1. The petitioner challenges an order passed by the Assistant Collector, 'A' Ward, Estate Duty-cum-Income-tax Circle, whereby the petitioner was asked to pay an interest under Section 70 at the rate of 4%, amounting...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 10 1985

D.R. Gupta Vs. Steel Authority of India Limited

Court : Orissa

Decided on : May-10-1985

Subject : ArbitrationCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 11; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 8

Reported in : AIR1985Ori224

Advocate for Appellant : M.R. Mohanty, ;N.C. Pattnaik, ;D.K. De and ;A.K. Sahoo, Advs.

ORDER1. This revision is directed against the order D/- 2-5-80 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, Rourkela in Misc. Case No. 33 of 1979 rejecting the petitioner's application under Section 8 of the Arbitration Act, 1940...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 23 1973

Madan Mohan Sureka Vs. Bhavani Cinema and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-23-1973

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 37, Rules 2 and 3

Reported in : AIR1974Cal6

Advocate for Appellant : Somnath Chatterjee, Adv.

ORDERS.K. Hazra, J. 1. This is an application by the defendant No. 2, Georgina May Narayan for leave to enter appearance and to defend this suit filed by the plaintiff under Order XXXVII of the Code...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 27 1974

Seimens India Ltd. Vs. Phanindra Kumar Dutt

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jun-27-1974

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Section 34

Reported in : AIR1975Cal271

Advocate for Appellant : S.B. Mukherjee, ;Jayanta Mitter and ;D.K. Shome, Advs.

ORDERHazra, J.1. This is an application for stay of a suit under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act, 1940. The matter arises in thisway :2. On or about March 7, 1974, one Phanindra Kumar Dutt filed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 14 1986

Preeti Singha Roy Vs. Calcutta Tramways Co. (1978) Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-14-1986

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : AIR1986Cal305

Advocate for Appellant : Debi De, Adv.

Umesh Chandra Banerjee, J.1. The equitable remedy by way of an injunction whether mandatory or interlocutory in nature, is discretionary in nature and is never granted as a matter of course. Lord Diplock's speech in the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 30 1977

Md. Ahmed Amolia and ors. Vs. Nirmal Chandra Roy and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Sep-30-1977

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 105, 111 and 116; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 90; ;Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Articles 64 and 65

Reported in : AIR1978Cal312

Advocate for Appellant : Jayanta Mitra, Adv.

Hazra, J. 1. This Is an appeal from the decree dated September 7, 1975 passed by Dipak Kumar Sen, J. in a suit filed by Nirmal Chandra Roy and Sk. Jagadiswari Dassi against the appellants and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 12 2003

Hardie Trading Ltd. and anr. Vs. Addisons Paint and Chemicals Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-12-2003

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958. - Sections 2, 2(2), 18, 44, 44(3), 46, 46(1), 46(3), 47, 48(2), 56, 69 and 102; Foregin Exchange (Regulation) Act, 1973 - Sections 28

Reported in : AIR2003SC3377; JT2003(Suppl1)SC444; 2003(27)PTC241(SC); 2003(7)SCALE451; (2003)11SCC92; [2003]46SCL778(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : H.N. Salve, Sr. Adv.,; Preetish Kapur,; Rajan Narain,;

Ruma Pal, J. 1. The trademarks which are the subject matter of dispute in these appeals were invented by James Hardie and Company Private Ltd., the predecessor in interest of the first appellant (who will be...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

Try free for 7 days

‹ Prev
1
2
3
4
Next ›
Last »

Advanced Search Results

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.