Advanced Search Results
Goldman Sachs Investments Vs. the Adjudicating Officer,
SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT
May-15-2008
Right to Information
(2008)BusLR611NULL
Shri. D.J. Khambatta, Shri. D. J. Khambatta
1. The primary question that arises for our consideration in this Appeal is whether the Securities and Exchange Board of India (hereinafter called the Board) could ask the Foreign Institutional Investors (FIIs) to furnish an undertaking...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAdarsh Co-operative Housing Vs. Union of India
Mumbai
Jul-27-2011
Land Acquisition
AJN 00-CRI-WP570.11 :1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.570 OF 2011 Adarsh Co-operative Housing ) Society Limited, a Society ) registered under the Maharashtra ) Co-operative Societies...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVasant Ganu Patil of Thane and Another Vs. The Chancellor and Others
Mumbai
Dec-11-2014
Education
Mr. J. Shekhar, Mr. Kowli
Anuja Prabhudessai, J. 1. Upon a difference of opinion between the Division Bench of this court, a reference under Clause 36 of Letters Patent has been made under order dated 11.5.2012 . The points of difference...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Kensigton Investment Ltd. Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India
SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT
Oct-11-2002
Land Acquisition
1. These four appeals are directed against the four separate orders made by the Adjudicating Officer imposing monetary penalty on the Appellants, holding them guilty of violating certain reporting requirements under regulation 7 of the Securities...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskFar East Investments Ltd. and Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of Ind ...
SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT
Mar-13-2003
Land Acquisition
1. The present appeal is directed against the order dated 24.5.2002 made by Respondent No. 2 (the adjudicating officer) imposing a monetary penalty of one lakh fifty thousand rupees on the Appellants, holding them guilty of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Municipal Corporation of Brihanmumbai a Statutory Corporation Cons ...
Mumbai
Mar-27-2006
Property
Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 - Sections 110, 123, 125, 126, 128, 130, 132, 133, 134, 137, 138, 139 to 144A, 146, 147, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 156 to 166, 166(2), 167, 167(2) and 217; Bombay Rent Control Act - Sections 2(10) and 7; Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 - Sections 3(1); West Bengal Premises Rent Control (Temporary Provisions) Act, 1950 - Sections 2(10); Calcutta Municipal Act, 1923 - Sections 123(1); Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961; Madhya Pradesh Municipal Corporation Act, 1956; Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958; Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957; Delhi Rent Control (Amendment) Act, 1988; Calcutta Municipalities Act, 1951 - Sections 168; Rent Restriction Act; Andhra Pradesh Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction Control) Act; Calcutta Munici
2006(3)ALLMR338; 2006(3)BomCR557
K.K. Singhvi, Sr. Adv., ;Birenra Saraf and ;V.K. Khatu, Advs.
R.M. Lodha, J.1. The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and its functionaries have preferred this appeal aggrieved by the judgment and order dated October 14, 2004, passed by the learned Single Judge. The learned single Judge...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKaram Chand Thapar and Bros.(Coal Sales) Ltd. Vs. Hindustan Constructi ...
Mumbai
May-09-2013
Land Acquisition
Oral Judgment: 1. Mr. D.J. Khambatta, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent states that respondent would proceed on the basis of the denial. The statement is accepted. By consent of parties taken up...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Zenith Electro-systment Pvt. Ltd
Mumbai
Nov-09-1989
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 43A(1), 43A(4), 372(2), 372(14), 374, 391 and 394(1)
[1990]69CompCas138(Bom)
D.J. Khambata, Adv.;P.T. Gajwani, Dy. Official Liquidator
Mrs. Sujata Manohar, J.1. Both these petitions are for amalgamation of Zenith Elector Systems P. Ltd. with Zenith Technologies Ltd. under section 391 of the Company Petition No 32 of 1989 is by the transferor-company, namely,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Nola Jonathan Ranbhise Vs. the Union of India, the Law and Judici ...
Mumbai
Feb-14-2014
Land Acquisition
M.S. Sonak, J. 1. By this Petition, the Petitioner inter alia, seeks a declaration that Section 28-A of the Bombay Civil Court Act,1869 is void on grounds of inconsistency with and repugnancy to the Section 299...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Nola Jonathan Ranbhise Vs. the Union of India, the Law and Judici ...
Mumbai
Feb-14-2014
Land Acquisition
M.S. Sonak, J. 1. By this Petition, the Petitioner inter alia, seeks a declaration that Section 28-A of the Bombay Civil Court Act,1869 is void on grounds of inconsistency with and repugnancy to the Section 299...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »