Advanced Search Results
M. Sekaran Vs. the General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corpora ...
Chennai
Dec-08-2005
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 12(3), 25H, 25F and 25J; Tamil Nadu Conferment of Permanency Act, 1981; Tamil Nadu Industrial Disputes Rules, 1958 - Rules 62, 63 and 63(2); Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946; Minor Mineral Concession Rules; Industrial Law
(2006)IILLJ258Mad; (2006)1MLJ295
D. Hariparanthaman, Adv. in W.P. Nos. 31378 , 31383 , 31499 to 31504, 31534 to 31539, 31430 to 31433, 33616, 33617, 33674 to 33679, 33680, 33681, 33685 to 33687, 33739 to 33745,33840 to 33845, 33846,
P. Sathasivam,J.1. Since the issue raised in the Writ Appeals and the Writ Petitions relates to employment/re-employment of persons retrenched in the Transport Corporations, these matters are being disposed of by the following common judgement.Writ Appeals:-...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK. Sumathi Vs. Eka Ratchagar Sabai Higher Secondary School Rep. by Its ...
Chennai
Jan-02-2007
Service
Tamil Nadu Recognised Private Schools (Regulation) Act, 1973 - Sections 2(6) and 2(7); Tamil Nadu Private Schools (Regulation) Rules, 1974 - Rule 15 and 15(4); Constitution of India - Articles 29(2), 30(1) and 226
(2007)5MLJ464
D. Hariparanthaman, Adv.
ORDERM.E.N. Patrudu, J.1. Clash between the right of the minority educational institution and the right of the meritorious teacher of the same institution is involved in this writ.2. The interesting and important points are posed for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMettur Chemicals Podhu Thozhilalar Sangam, Mettur Vs. Chemplast Sanmar ...
Chennai
Jul-11-1997
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 9A; Constitution of India - Article 226
(1997)IILLJ963Mad
D. Hariparanthaman, Adv.
ORDER1. The above writ petitions are filed by Mettw Chemicals Podhu Thozhilalar Sangam and Chemplast Employees Union, Mettur Dam for a relief of mandamus directing the respondent not to discontinue the existing benefits, namely regular fixed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
V. Radhakrishnan, Vs. the Registrar, Central Administrative Tribunal, ...
Chennai
Jun-09-2007
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 2; Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishments (Conferment of Permanent Status to Workmen) Act, 1981 - Sections 3
2007(3)CTC672; (2007)4MLJ650; 2008(1)SLJ568(NULL)
D. Hariparanthaman, Adv.
ORDERV. Dhanapalan, J.1. The petitioners seek to quash the order dated 13.06.2000 passed by the first respondent Tribunal in O.A. No.658 of 1998 and to consequently direct the respondents 2 to 4 to regularise their services.2....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTitan Employees Welfare Union, Rep. by Its General Secretary Vs. Gover ...
Chennai
Jan-20-2007
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 12, 12(3), 18 and 18(1); Trade Union Act, 1956
(2007)2LLJ307Mad
N.G.R. Prasad, Adv. for ;D. Hariparanthaman, Adv.
ORDERP. Jyothimani, J.1. The writ petition is filed for a direction against the second respondent to initiate conciliation proceedings to decide the question as to whether Clause 8 of the Settlement Deed entered under Section 18...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskN. Mylsamy and P. Selvaraj Vs. Cheran Transport Corp. Ltd. and the Pre ...
Chennai
Feb-09-2004
Labour and IndustrialService
Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 11A; Constitution of India - Article 226
[2004(101)FLR963]; (2004)IILLJ962Mad; (2004)2MLJ198
D. Hariparanthaman, Adv.
D. Murugesan, J.1. The appellant in W.A. No: 1476 of 2001 was a conductor in the respondent Corporation since 20.06.1975. He was on duty on 14.09.1991 in the bus belonging to the respondent Corporation plying between...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskA. Chandra Bose, Vs. the Executive Engineer, Distribution, Tamilnadu E ...
Chennai
Dec-07-2007
Service
Constitution of India - Article 14
(2008)4MLJ886
D. Hariparanthaman, Adv.
ORDERV. Dhanapalan, J.1. The question involved in these matters being common, they are being decided by this common order.2. Brief facts leading to the filing of these writ petitions are, as under:(a) The petitioners, namely, A....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskB. Iyamperumal. Vs. the Director of Rural Development and ors.
Chennai
Jul-17-2012
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 226
Mrs.S.Srimathy, Adv.
Prayer in W.P.(MD) No.7606 of 2006Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of writ of certiorari to call for the records of the impugned order in Na.Ka.No.39076/2004/C5 dated 9/3/2006...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskR. Thirunavukkarasau and Others Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu, Rep.by It ...
Chennai
Aug-14-2012
Education
For the Petitioners: P. Jagadeesan, N.G.R. Prasad for M/s. Row and Reddy, C. Selvaraju, SC for M/s. C.S. Associates, M. Ravi, P. Rajendran, Advocates. For the Respondents: Arvindh Pandian, AAG Assisted by M.C. Swamy, Spl. G.P., R6 to R8 - Notice served. N
(Prayers: W.P.No.19631/2011: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issue of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the entire records relating to the impugned seniority list dated 1.1.2011...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskManagement of Tiruttani Co-operative Sugar Mills Ltd. Vs. Presiding Of ...
Chennai
Aug-07-2001
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957 - Rule 22; Employment Exchange (Compulsory Notification of Vacancies) Act, 1959
(2002)ILLJ589Mad; (2001)3MLJ548
V. Karthick, Adv.
ORDERD. Murugesan, J. 1. The management of TiruttaniCo-operative Sugar Mills Limited,Thiruvalangadu, Chengai Anna District, is thewrit petitioner. The second respondent is theTiruttani Co-operative Sugar Mills EmployeesUnion, Thiruvalangadu, Chengai-AnnaDistrict, represented by its Secretary. The writpetitioner is referred...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »