Advanced Search Results

Sri Girish Ch. Gogoi Vs. the State of Assam.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. B D Goswami; Mr. B Borthakur; Mr. A Gohain, Advs.

1. Heard Mr. B D Goswami, learned counsel appearing for the appellant (writ petitioner). The Education Department and its officials are represented by the standing counsel Mr. M R Pathak. The private respondent Nos. 5 to...

State of Assam and ors. Vs. SirajuddIn and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 96 - Order 8, Rule 10

Advocate for Appellant : D. Goswami, Adv.

I.A. Ansari, J.1. The second appeal has arisen out of the judgment and decree, dated 22.8.1994, passed by the learned Assistant District Judge, Karimganj, in Title Appeal No. 27 of 1990, whereby the appeal was dismissed...

Nirmal Kalita Vs. State of Assam and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 21

Advocate for Appellant : B.D. Goswami, Adv.

A.H. Saikia, J.1. Heard Mr. B.D. Goswami, learned counsel for the appellant. Also heard Mrs. A. Hazarika, learned Govt. counsel appearing on behalf of the State respondents.2. The learned Single Judge dismissed the Civil Rule No....

Dr. Anup Kumar Pow Vs. State of Assam and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Advocate for Appellant : B.D. Goswami, S. Barthakur and B. Barman, Advs.

D. Biswas, J. 1. Writ petition No. 4303 of 2002 has been filed by Dr. Anup Kumar Pow for quashment of the order of allotment of a seat in Post Graduate Course in Obstetrics and Gynaecology...

Murti Dhar Singh and ors. Vs. Vijendra Singh Jafa

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 362 and 482

Advocate for Appellant : B.D. Goswami and S. Rahman, Advs.

A.H. Saikia, J. We have heard Mr. B.D. Goswami, learned counsel for the petitioners. None appears for the respondent. 1. This revision petition has been placed before the Division Bench of this Court on being referred...

Jaya Handique and Others Vs. Bimala Dutta

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. B.D. Goswami

Judgment and Order (Oral) 1. Heard Mr. B.D. Goswami, learned counsel for the appellants. Also heard Mr. A.C. Sarma, learned counsel for the respondent. 2. This appeal is preferred by the successors of the original defendant...

Pema Khandu and Others Vs. Nabam Rebia, Speaker of the Arunachal Prade ...

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Land Acquisition

Judgment and Order (CAV) [1] The basic issue involved in these two writ petitions is as to whether the Governor of a State is to act only with the aid and advice of the council of...

Dulu Gogoi and ors. Vs. State of Assam

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 302 and 304

Advocate for Appellant : A.R. Banerjee and B. Choudhury, Advs.

M. Sharma, J.1. This appeal is directed against the conviction and sentence awarded by learned Sessions Judge, Dibrugarh in Sessions Case No. 176(D)/87.2. The five appellants namely (1) Bulu Gogol, (2) Kakati Gogoi (3) Girin Gogoi,...

Arun Singhvi Vs. State of Assam

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Package Commodities Act - Sections 39; Package Commodities Rules; Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 - Sections 2, 39, 39(1) and 63

Advocate for Appellant : T.C. Khetri and R.D. Kayal, Advs.

S.K. Homchaudhuri, J.1. In a summary proceedings in C.R. Case No. 280/89, the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Tezpur convicted the petitioner and sentenced him to pay fine of Rs. 1,500/-, in default, to suffer S.I....

Fakar UddIn Laskar and anr. Vs. State of Assam

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 162 and 313; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 395

Advocate for Appellant : A.B. Choudhury, K. Basar, M.H. Rajborbhuyan, M.A. Laskar and N.K. Singh, Advs.

J.M. Srivastava, J.1. These appeals are directed against the judgment and order dated 17-7-84 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Cachar at Silchar, whereby the appellants were convicted under Section 395, IPC and sentenced to rigorous...