Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: d g a · Page 1 of about 10,199 results (0.388 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 16 2000

Brajesh Kumar Singh Vs. State of U.P. and Another

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-16-2000

Subject : CivilConstitution

Reported in : 2001(1)AWC305; (2001)1UPLBEC20

Advocate for Appellant : Janardan Sahay and ;K.N. Rai, Advs.

G. P. Mathur, J.1. The petitioner seeks quashing of the order dated 26.8.2000 passed by the State Government whereby he has been disengaged from the post of District Government Counsel (Civil). Ballia.2. The case of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 19 1998

Chacko P.C. Vs. State of Kerala and ors.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jun-19-1998

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Regulating Conditions of Service, Duties, Remuneration etc. of Advocate General Rules - Rule 2; Kerala Government Law Officers (Appointment and Conditions of Service) and Conduct of Cases Rules, 1978 - Rules 19, 19(1), 19(2), 19(2(1)), 19(10), 19(11) and 21; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 24, 321, 378, 407(5) and 439; Kerala High Court Rules, 1971 - Rule 173; Constitution of India - Article 165

Reported in : (1998)IILLJ587Ker

Advocate for Appellant : Babu Joseph Kuruvathuzha, Adv.

A.C. Lakshmanan, J.1. Though a Division Bench of this Court, in the decision reported in 1997 (1) KLT 788 expressed their displeasure and sorrow by the unseemly controversy between the Advocate General (hereinafter referred to as...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 04 2011

State of U.P and ors Vs. Rakesh Kumar Keshari and anr

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-04-2011

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of india - Article 226

1. Leave granted2. This appeal by Special Leave is directed against Judgment dated 11.07.2005 rendered by the Division Bench of High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 28444 of 2005 by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 18 1999

Shankar Singh Yadav Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Another

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-18-1999

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Presidential Rule

Reported in : 2000(2)AWC1270

Advocate for Appellant : Kapil Dev and ;Arun Kumar, Advs.

Bhanwar Singh, J.1. The petitioner Shankar Singh Yadav has filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for Issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 29 1977

Devendra Kumar Shukla Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-29-1977

Subject : Service

Acts : Indian Supply Service Rules, 1961 - Rule 6; Indian Supply Service Rules, 1961 - Rule 13(1)

Reported in : ILR1977Delhi538

Advocate for Appellant : B. Kirpal,; Kailash Vasdev,; Shankar Vaidialingam,;

Yogeshwar Dayal, J. (1) This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution filed by Shri Devendra Kumar Shukla for a suitably writ for quashing the revised seniority list as on 11-3-1974 in respect of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 02 1996

M.S. Pandya Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Dec-02-1996

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Bombay Prohibition Act; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16 and 309; Gujarat Civil Services (ROP) Rules, 1987

Reported in : (1997)1GLR647; (1997)IILLJ89Guj

Advocate for Appellant : P.V. Hathi,; D.G. Chauhan and; D.G. Chawhan, Advs.

1. By consent these three petitions have been heard together and are being decided accordingly. 2. The prayer almost common in these three petitions is for the revision of pay-scale of Librarian. The initial prayer is...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 12 2003

Mohandas (Sic) Khemani Vs. the State of Maharashtra Through the Addl. ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-12-2003

Subject : Criminal

Acts : The Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - Sections 5A; Customs Act - Sections 108; Baggage Rules; National Security Act; Maintenance of Internal Security Act - Sections 3, 3(1) and 3(2)

Reported in : 2003(2)ALD(Cri)59; 2003BomCR(Cri)937

Advocate for Appellant : D.G. Bagve, Adv.

D.G. Deshpande, J.1. Heard Mr. Bagve for the petitioner and Mr. D.S. Mhaispurkar, APP for the State. Petition is filed by the father of the detenu. The name of the detenu is Pursushottam Mohandas Khemani. He...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 15 1973

The Union of India (Uoi) Vs. A.K. Mathiborwala

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-15-1973

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : (1974)76BOMLR659

Nathwani, J.1. This is a letters patent appeal from the judgment and Order of Mr. Justice Kania dated January 12, 1973 in a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India setting aside an...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 02 1996

State of Maharashtra and Etc. Vs. Harishchandra Tukaram Awatade

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-02-1996

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 307, 324, 326 and 427; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1908 - Sections 313 and 378(1)

Reported in : 1997CriLJ612

Advocate for Appellant : D.G. Bagwe, A.P.P.

Vishnu Sahai, J. 1. Since both these matters arise out of a common incident and the same impugned judgment, they are being disposed off together. 2. A perverse judgment of acquittal dated 3rd December 1982 passed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 20 2009

Vijay Harishchandra Patel Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Mar-20-2009

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Right to Information Act (RTI); Wakf Act; Delimitation Act; National Commission for Minorities Act, 1992 - Sections 2; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15, 15(1), 15(3), 16, 16(1), 17, 21, 25 to 30, 38, 39, 46, 51A, 51C and 253

Reported in : (2009)3GLR2153

Advocate for Appellant : D.G. Shukla, Adv.

K.S. Radhakrishnan, C.J.1. Petitioner has come up with this public interest litigation challenging the steps taken by Union of India and the Planning Commission to utilise the national resources in favour of a particular minority community...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial