Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: d d thakur · Page 1 of about 157 results (0.069 seconds)

May 09 1994

Mohinder Pal Vs. State of H.P. and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : May-09-1994

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Himachal Pradesh Kutlehar Forest (Acquisition of Management) Act, 1992 - Sections 1, 4 and 5; ;Constitution of India - Articles 31, 31A, 31A(1), 31A(2), 31C, 39 and 245

Reported in : AIR1995HP15

Advocate for Appellant : D.D. Thakur, Sr. Adv.,; K.D. Sood and; A.K. Goel, Ad

Bhawani Singh, J. 1. The petitionerhas challenged the constitutional validity of the Himachal Pradesh Kutlehar Forest (Acquisition of Management) Act, 1992 (hereafter shortly, 'the Management Acquisition Act' or 'this Act'), on numerous grounds being recorded in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 26 1999

Balbir Vs. State of Haryana and Another

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-26-1999

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 220(1), 223 and 311; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 235(1) and 239; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302

Reported in : AIR2000SC11; 1999(2)ALD(Cri)869; 2000CriLJ169a; JT1999(8)SC403; RLW2000(1)SC28; 1999(6)SCALE600; (2000)1SCC285; [1999]Supp4SCR120

Advocate for Appellant : D.D. Thakur,; Ranjit Kumar,; Anu Mohla,;

K.T. Thomas, J. 1. Seldom would the courts have come across such a weird scenario as the present case has presented. In respect of one victim in one murder episode two diametrically divergent stories were put...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 20 1997

M/S. Ivory Traders and Manufacturers Association and Other Vs. Union o ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-20-1997

Subject : EnvironmentConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 7, VII(2), 8, 14, 19(1), 20(1), 48A, 245, 249, 250, 252 and 300A; Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972; Wild Life (Protection) Amendment Act, 1991 - Sections 39(1)(C), 44, 49C(7) and 51(2); Wild Birds Protection Act, 1887; Wild Birds and Animals (Protection) Act, 1912 - Sections 3, 4 and 11; Wild Life (Protection) Amendment Act, 1986; Wild Animals, Birds and Plants (Protection) Act, 1972 - Sections 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, 19, 24, 33, 34, 35, 36, 38, 39, 40, 43, 44, 49, 49A, 49B, 49C, 50, 51, 54, 57, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64 and 66; Principal Act - Sections 9, 10, 13 to 17, 38J, 44, 51 and 63; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 360; Probation of Offenders Act, 1958; Non-Ferrous Metal Control Order, 1958; Bombay Municipal Corpo

Reported in : AIR1997Delhi267b; ILR1997Delhi22

Advocate for Appellant : D.D. Thakur, Sr. Adv. and; S.B. Sharma and; N. Bhat,;

ORDERAnil Dev Singh, J. 1. There are two sets of writ petitions before us. In Civil Writ Petitions Nos. 1016/92, 1272/92, 1749/92, 1631/92, the petitioners challenge certain amendments carried out in the Wild Life (Protection) Act,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Try free for 7 days How AI Brief works

May 04 1999

Punjab Communications Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-04-1999

Subject : Banking

Acts : Highways Act, 1990 - Sections 278

Reported in : AIR1999SC1801; JT1999(3)SC331; 1999(3)SCALE149; (1999)4SCC727; [1999]2SCR1033

Advocate for Appellant : D.D. Thakur,; Rajiv Dhawan and; P.C. Jain,;

M. Jagannadha Rao, J. 1. Leave granted.2. These two appeals have been filed by the Punjab Communications Ltd (hereinafter called the 'PCL'), a public-sector undertaking of the State of Punjab against the judgment dated 27.2.1998 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 13 1999

A.K. Singh and ors. Vs. Uttarakhand Jan Morcha and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-13-1999

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 197 and 228; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 109, 120-B, 300, 302, 304, 341 and 342

Reported in : AIR1999SC2193; 1999CriLJ3500; JT1999(4)SC414; 1999(3)SCALE550; (1999)4SCC476; [1999]3SCR624; 1999(2)LC962(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : D.D. Thakur,; Satish Chandra,; A.S. Nambiar,;A.M. Khanwilka

K.T. Thomas, J. 1. Leave granted.2. There was a stir in support of the demand for a separate State of Uttarakhand comprising of certain hilly regions of the State of U.P. and some other areas. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 04 1996

Janaki S. Menon and Others Vs. Dr. V.R.S. Krishanan and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-04-1996

Subject : Direct TaxationCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 21, Rule 90

Reported in : 1996VIIIAD(SC)392; AIR1997SC1894; I(1997)BC135(SC); [1997]223ITR771(SC); JT1997(10)SC15; 1996(8)SCALE1; (1997)2SCC623; [1996]Supp7SCR207

Advocate for Appellant : D.D. Thakur and Ramesh Babu,; M.R., Advs

Leave granted.We have heard learned counsel on both sides. These appeals by special leave arise from the order of the High Court of Kerala made on November 1,1955 in CRP Nos.1745 and 1980 of 1995. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 25 1999

Ram Lal and Another Vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-25-1999

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 320; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 307, 324 and 326

Reported in : AIR1999SC895; 1999(1)ALD(Cri)340; 1999(1)ALT(Cri)154; 1999CriLJ1342; 1999(1)Crimes41(SC); JT1999(1)SC147; 1999(2)KLT26a(SC); 1999(I)OLR(SC)434; 1999(1)SCALE162; (1999)2SCC2

Advocate for Appellant : D.D Thakur and; Rajeev Sharma, Advs

ORDER1. Leave granted.2. The first appellant Ram Lal stands convicted of the offence under Section 326 of the IPC and is undergoing a sentence of three years. The second appellant has been convicted of Section 324...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 24 2001

Tek Chand Vs. Dile Ram

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-24-2001

Subject : Election

Acts : Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 36(2), 100(1) and 116-A; Constitution of India - Article 191 (1); Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 - Rule 48-A; Fundamental Rule 56; Bombay Civil Service Rules, Rule 161(2)

Reported in : AIR2001SC905; JT2001(2)SC114; (2001)2MLJ45(SC); 2001(1)SCALE471; (2001)3SCC290; [2001]1SCR527

Advocate for Appellant : D.D. Thakur, Sr. Adv.,; N.N. Bhatt,; Vijay Prakash,;

Shivaraj V. Patil, J. 1. Aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 24.03.2000 passed by the High Court of Himachal Pradesh in Election Petition No. 2/98, setting aside the election of the appellant from 61-Nachan (S.C.)...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 21 1996

Tahir Vs. State (Delhi)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-21-1996

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Terrorists and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 5; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 27; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313

Reported in : 1996IIIAD(SC)206; AIR1996SC3079; 1996(1)ALD(Cri)301; 1996(1)Crimes222(SC); 1996(3)SCALE41; (1996)3SCC338; [1996]3SCR757

Advocate for Appellant : D.D. Thakur and; R.N. Keshwani, Advs

ORDER1. The appellant calls in question his conviction and sentence for an offence under Section 5 of Terrorists and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act 1987 (hereinafter referred to as TADA) recorded by the Designated Court II, Delhi...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 26 1996

R. Puthunainar Alhithan, Etc. Vs. P.H. Pandian and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-26-1996

Subject : Election

Acts : Representation of the People Act 1951 - Sections 123(6)

Reported in : 1996IVAD(SC)267; AIR1996SC1599; JT1996(4)SC146; 1996(3)SCALE317; (1996)3SCC624; [1996]3SCR932

Advocate for Appellant : D.D. Thakur,; Anant Palli,; Purnima Bhatt,;

1. These two appeals, one by the returned candidate whose election was set aside and the connected appeal by the unsuccessful candidate whose evidence in respect of other issues was not accepted by the High Court...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

Try free for 7 days

‹ Prev
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Next ›
Last »

Advanced Search Results

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.