Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: d d sud · Page 1 of about 4 results (0.055 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 02 1985

Smt. Shakuntla Devi Vs. Smt. Amar Devi

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-02-1985

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 122 and 126

Reported in : AIR1985HP109

Advocate for Appellant : D.D. Sud, Adv. vice Chhabil Dass, Adv.

H.S. Thakur, J. 1. This is a Letters Patent Appeal against the judgment of the learned single Judge of this Court.2. A few facts relevant to decide this appeal may be stated. Shri Sansar Chand filed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 15 1980

AmIn Chand and Sons Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Amritsar Ii.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-15-1980

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1982)18CTR(P& H)241; [1982]133ITR439(P& H)

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. D. D. Sud

B. S. DHILLON, J. - This judgment will dispose of Income-tax References Nos. 105 to 108 of 1975 as the questions of fact and law arising out of these references are common.The following questions of law...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 31 1990

Shri Sudhir Kumar Arya and ors. Vs. State and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-31-1990

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1974 - Section 5(2); ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B and 420; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Section 164; ;Constitution of India - Article 21

Reported in : 1992CriLJ21

Advocate for Appellant : D.D. Sud and; A.K. Goel, Advs.

ORDERBhawani Singh, J.1. These petitions are being decided by this judgment, since the prosecution case against them has similar pattern and counsel for the parties also argued them together.2. Briefly, the allegation against the petitioners is...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 04 1997

Raheem Khan Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Aug-04-1997

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - Sections 3(1) and 7; Customs Act; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 307; I.P.P.R. - Sections 3 and 6; Constitution of India - Article 226; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act

Reported in : 1998CriLJ1151; 1998(1)WLC16; 1997(2)WLN295

Advocate for Appellant : Sundeep Mehta, Adv.

G.L. Gupta, J.1. This habeas corpus petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been put in on behalf of Raheem Khan who has been detained under Section 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreign...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial