Advanced Search Results

SumikIn Bussan International Vs. Manharlal T. Mody and

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 64 and 64(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 2002

Reported in : 2004(4)BomCR860; 2004(4)MhLj919

Advocate for Appellant : D.D. Madon, ;H.N. Thakore and ;Agnes Jivani, Advs., i/b., Thakore Jariwala and Associates ;R.M. Kadam and ;C.S. Kapadia, Advs., i/b., H.K. Sudhakarrao and Kamlesh Kharade, Adv., i/b., DSK Legal for IN

ORDERAnoop V. Mohta, J.1. The applicants, in this Chamber Summons, being third persons to the Judgment and Decree dated, 31st May, 2002, prayed that the warrant of attachment, dated 12th January, 2004, issued in respect of...

Rajiv K. Mehta Vs. Rekha H. Sheth and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Justice Venkata-ramayya

1. By consent of parties, both these notice of motions were heard together and are being disposed of by a common order. 2. Notice of Motion No.368 of 2011 is filed by defendant no.1 inter alia...

Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi Ltd. Vs. Chembra Estates and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Banking

Acts : Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 - Sections 17, 18 and 31

Reported in : AIR2001Bom170; 2001(1)BomCR821; [2001]105CompCas35(Bom); 2001(2)MhLj206

Advocate for Appellant : D.D. Madan and ;C.H. Balsara, Advs. i/b., ;Mulla and Mulla and Craigie Blunt and Caroe, ;S.M. Gorwadkar and ;T. Patwardhan, Advs.

R.J. Kochar, J.1.The above chamber summonses are the offshoot in Suit No. 954 of 1987. I am called upon to decide the above chamber summonses when the suit itself, being a bank suit, has stood transferred...

B.R. Thadani Vs. Syndicate Bank and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Indian Contract Act - Sections 128

Reported in : [2001]107CompCas569(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : D.D. Madan, Adv., i/b., Mulla and Mulla and Craigie, Blunt and Caroe

R.J. Kochar, J. 1. The applicants have taken out the above company applicationpraying for a direction to implead the applicant as partly respondent to company applicationNo. 558 of 2000. In support of the Judge's summons, the...

Hsbc Bank Vs. Silverline Technologies Ltd. and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 13 and 44A - Order 12, Rule 6

Reported in : AIR2006Bom134; 2006(2)ALLMR409; 2006(5)BomCR753; 2006(3)MhLj107

Advocate for Appellant : D.D. Madan and ;P.S. Colabawalla, Advs., i/b., ;Kanga and Co.

S.U. Kamdar, J.1. The present notice of motion has been taken out for a decree on admission for the sum of US$ 17,919,603.68 with interest @9% p.a. from the date of filing the suit till payment...

B.R. Thadani Vs. Oriental Bank of Commerce

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CommercialCompany

Acts : Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 - Sections 22; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 128

Reported in : 2002(2)BomCR263

Advocate for Appellant : D.D. Madan, Adv.

ORDERR.J. Kochar, J.1. The applicants have taken out the above company application praying for a direction to implead the applicant as party respondent to the company application No. 557 of 2000. In support of the Judges'...

Smt. Shantibai K. Vardhan and ors. Vs. Ms. Meera G. Patel and Mr. Kira ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Limitation Act - Sections 5; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 80 - Order 7, Rule 14 and 14(3) - Order 8, Rule 1 - Order 13, Rule 1 - Order 18, Rules 1 and 17A - Order 18A, Rule 17A - Order 41, Rule 27; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 2002; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1999

Reported in : 2008(6)ALLMR212; (2008)110BOMLR3055

Advocate for Appellant : D.D. Madan, Adv., i/b., Vigil Juris, Adv.

V.M. Kanade, J.1. The appellants are the original plaintiffs and the respondents are the original defendants. For the sake of convenience of the parties, they shall be referred to as plaintiffs and defendants.2. The plaintiffs have...

Leela Capital Finance Limited Vs. Modiluft Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Banking

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 37, Rules 1, 2 and 3; Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules, 1980 - Rule 227

Reported in : 2001(2)BomCR110

Advocate for Appellant : Rohit Kapadia, ;D.D. Madan and ;Salil Shah, Advs. i/b., Pimenta Kapasi & Co.

R.J. Kochar, J.1. The plaintiffs have prayed for an order and decree against the defendants to pay to the plaintiffs a sum of Rs. 5,67,68,433.23 as per particulars of claim Exh. N to the plaint together...

Nirfabrics Limited Vs. Nirlon Limited

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Bombay Relief Undertakings, (Special Provisions) Act, 1958 - Sections 3 and 4; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 34; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 226, 245 and 246; Bombay General Clauses Act, 1904 - Sections 21; Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 22

Reported in : 1999(1)ALLMR50; 1999(1)BomCR362; 1999(1)MhLj512

Advocate for Appellant : Janak Dwarkadas and ;D.D. Madan, Advs. i/b. ;Kanga & Co.

ORDERF.I. Rebello, J.1. Admit. Respondents waive service. By consent heard forthwith. 2. The short, but interesting question that arises in this petition is whether the Notification issued under section 4 of the Bombay Relief Undertakings (Special...

Taj Trade and Transport Co. Ltd Vs. Oil and Natural Gas Commission and ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CompanyArbitration

Acts : Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 126

Reported in : 1992(2)BomCR125; (1992)94BOMLR620; [1994]80CompCas740(Bom); 1992(2)MhLj1110

Advocate for Appellant : D.Y. Chandrachud and;D.D. Madan, Advs., i/b.,;Gagrat and Co

A.A. Cazi J. 1. I am passing orders on three suits which are for referring disputes to arbitration and on three petitions which are for interim reliefs in those proceedings. The circumstances giving rise to these...