Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: counsel for the applicant krishna devan · Page 1 of about 4 results (0.174 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 09 2009

Sri N. Barnabas Vs. the Secretary, Postal Services Board and Others

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Hyderabad

Decided on : Feb-09-2009

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Counsel for the Applicant : Krishna Devan (Present). Counsel for the Respondents : P. Phalguna Rao(Not Present).

Mrs. Bharati Ray, Member (J) This application has been filed by the applicant questioning the order of Sr. Supdt. of Post Offices, Narasaraopet Division, 4th respondent, dated 30.08.2005 whereby the applicant has been informed that his...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 16 2009

Sri A.Balakrishna Vs. Union of India, Rep. by Chief Postmaster General ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Hyderabad

Decided on : Jun-16-2009

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Counsel for the Applicant : Krishna Devan, Advocate. Counsel for the Respondents : A. Radha Krishna, Addl.CGSC.

ORAL ORDER: {As per Hon'ble Mrs. Bharati Ray, Member (Judl.)} Heard Mr. Krishna Devan, learned counsel for the applicant. None appears for the respondents. This application has been filed questioning the order No.ST-IV/SUS/Review/AB, dated 25.06.2008 passed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 21 2009

Sri A.V. Ramana and Others Vs. Union of India, Rep. by Its Director Ge ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Hyderabad

Decided on : Jan-21-2009

Subject : MRTP

Advocate for Appellant : Counsel for the Applicants : Krishna Devan, Advocate. Counsel for the Respondents : M. Brahma Reddy, Sr. P.C. for C.G.

Mrs. Bharati Ray, Member (J) This application has been filed by the applicant seeking for the following reliefs: Set aside the impugned order No. B1/OTP/GENL/VIII dated 4.1.2008 passed by R-4 under the directions of R-3, by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 14 2009

Shri K.Venkateswara Rao Vs. Union of India Rep. by the Comptroller and ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Hyderabad

Decided on : Jul-14-2009

Subject : Right to Information

Advocate for Appellant : Counsel for the Applicant : Krishna Devan, Advocate. Counsel for the Respondents : Ms. N.Shakti, Addl. Cgsc.

SHRI HRIDAY NARAIN, MEMBER (ADMN.) The present OA has been filed by the applicant against imposition of penalty of compulsory retirement from service. 2. The facts as stated in the OA are that the applicant was...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial