Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: chetan sharma · Page 1 of about 601 results (0.119 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 03 2006

Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. Vs. Dharam Chand Gupta

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-03-2006

Subject : Contract

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2007(I)CTLJ318(Del)

Advocate for Appellant : Chetan Sharma, Sr. Adv. and; Debasish Mishra, Adv

Vijender Jain, A.C.J.1. Aggrieved by the order passed by the learned Single Judge, the appellant has filed the present appeal. Mr. Chetan Sharma, learned Counsel appearing for the appellant has contended that it is well settled...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 13 2003

Shri Manjit Singh, S/O Sh. Khazan Singh Vs. Punjab and Sind Bank, Thro ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-13-2003

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2003VAD(Delhi)1; 105(2003)DLT116; 2003(70)DRJ23; 2004(1)SLJ69(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : Chetan Sharma, Sr. Adv. and; Ashok Bhalla, Adv

Vijender Jain, J. 1. Rule.2. Petitioner was working in MM Grade/Scale 2 with the respondent/Bank. A charge-sheet was served upon the petitioner on 25th January, 1992. The same is at page 45 of the paper-book, the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 17 2005

Ms. Raj Mehta Vs. H.P.S. Chawla

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-17-2005

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act - Sections 138; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 120B, 147, 148, 323, 354, 406, 498A and 506; Criminal Proceudre Code - Sections 482

Reported in : 2006(1)ALD(Cri)27; IV(2005)BC1; 121(2005)DLT657; 2005(83)DRJ147

Advocate for Appellant : Chetan Sharma, Sr. Adv. and; Sanjeev Tiwari, Adv

Manju Goel, J.1. Petitioner is one of the accused in criminal complaint No. 139/1995 titled H.P.S. Chawla v. Raj Mehta and Ors. U/s 147/148/323/506 IPC r/w Section 120 IPC filed by the respondent. On the same...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 02 2009

Lt. Col. Lalit Chawla (Retd.) Vs. Sh. Ashok Chawla and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-02-2009

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 47 and 151 - Order 21, Rules 54, 66 and 92 - Order 39, Rule 2A

Reported in : 161(2009)DLT78

Advocate for Appellant : Manish Gambhir, Adv.,; G.L. Rawal, Sr. Adv. and; Jyoti Mend

Manmohan Singh, J.1. By this order, I propose to decide three applications being I.A.Nos.9244/08, 9741/08 and 9742/08.2. The brief facts are that the Plaintiff and Defendants No. 1 and 2 are the sons of Late Sh....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 15 2004

Metcalfe and Hodgkinson Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Container Corporation of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-15-2004

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Insurance Act, 1938 - Sections 42(4) and 64UM ; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226

Reported in : AIR2005Delhi211; II(2005)BC48; 2005(1)CTLJ177(Del); 116(2005)DLT457; 2005(79)DRJ579

Advocate for Appellant : I.S. Alag and; J.S. Lamba, Advs

D.K. Jain, J.1. RULE D.B. 2. Having regard to the urgency of the matter, with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, it is taken up for final disposal at this stage itself. 3. Challenge...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 03 2011

Baker Oil Tools(India) Pvt.Ltd. and anr. Vs. Baker Hughes Ltd.and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jun-03-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Chetan Sharma; Mr. Siddharth Mittal; Mr. Shashi Mohan, Advs.

1. Whether the Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes 2. To be referred to Reporter or not? Yes 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes 1....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 08 2003

Roop Lal Bhalla and ors. Vs. State and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-08-2003

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 107, 131, 145 and 146

Reported in : 2003CriLJ4308; 106(2003)DLT388; 2003(70)DRJ194; 2003(3)JCC1422

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Sharma, Adv. in Crl.R.311/2003 and; Chetan Sharma, Sr. Adv. and Vikas Sharma, Adv. in Crl. M(M) 13

J.D. Kapoor, J.1. Both these petitions are interlinked and arise from the same set of facts and proceedings and are being decided together.2. Petitioners of Crl.R.311/2003 are challenging the order dated 7.4.2003 whereby Sub Divisional Magistrate...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 02 2006

Air Vice Marshal J.S. Kumar Vs. Governing Council of Air Force and anr ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-02-2006

Subject : Civil

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act, 1965; Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 6N; Societies Registration Act; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 16, 32, 226 and 266(1)

Reported in : 126(2006)DLT330; 2006(86)DRJ711

Advocate for Appellant : Chetan Sharma, Sr. Adv.,; Kamal Nijhawan and; Sanjeev Kumar

Markandeya Katju, C.J.1. This Letters Patent Appeal has been filed against the impugned judgment of the learned Single Judge dated 12th August 2005 by which he dismissed the petition.2. Heard the learned counsels for the parties...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 28 2004

Alan Dick and Company Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-28-2004

Subject : Contract

Reported in : 114(2004)DLT440; 2004(77)DRJ638

Advocate for Appellant : Chetan Sharma, Sr. Adv. and; Vivek Singh and; Nidhi Baweja

D.K. Jain, J.1. RULE D.B. 2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is taken up for final disposal at this stage itself. 3. Challenge in this writ petition is to the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 26 2008

Dsa Engineers Vs. Housing and Urban Development (Hudco)

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-26-2008

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 31(7) and 37; Delhi High Court Act - Sections 10; Interest Act; Arbitration Act, 1940

Reported in : 2008(4)ARBLR347(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : Chetan Sharma, Sr. Adv. an; S.K. Tiwari, Adv

Manmohan, J.1. The present appeal has been filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 read with Section 10 of the Delhi High Court Act against the judgment dated 21st April, 2004 in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial