Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: chandra shekhar · Page 1 of about 875 results (0.146 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 18 2010

Keshav Kaushik Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Haryana and ors. Etc. Etc.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-18-2010

Subject : ConstitutionService

Permod Kohli, J.I. General1. District Judiciary is the foundation of the judicial system upon which the whole edifice of the judicial institutions stands. Judiciary is the bulwark of the democratic system in India and reckons indubitably...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 24 2002

Shashikant Singh Vs. Tarkeshwar Singh and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-24-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 190, 193, 209, 319, 319(1) and 319(4); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34 and 302; Arms Act - Sections 27

Reported in : AIR2002SC2031; 2002(2)ALD(Cri)307; 2002(2)ALT(Cri)24; 2002(2)BLJR1224; (2002)3CALLT55(SC); 2002CriLJ2806; 2002(2)Crimes350(SC); JT2002(4)SC386; RLW2002(4)SC506; 2002(4)SCAL; (2002) 5 SCC 738

Advocate for Appellant : P.S. Mishra, Sr. Adv.,; S. Chandra Shekhar,; Vishnu Sharma

Y.K. Sabharwal, J.1. Leave granted.2. Can a person summoned pursuant to an order passed by a court in exercise of power conferred by Section 319 of the code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (the Code) be tried...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 09 1990

Abdul Nasir Khan Vs. L. Hmingliana and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-09-1990

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1991)93BOMLR298; 1991CriLJ507

Advocate for Appellant : Ram Jethmalani,;M.A.H. Solkar, Advs. and;Smt. R.P. Desai, Public Prosecutor.

Kurdukar, J.1. This petition for a writ of habeas corpus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed by the detenu (petitioner) challenging the legality and correctness of the detention order dated April 24,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 09 2001

Jamil Ahmad and ors. Vs. 5th Addl. Distt. Judge, Moradabad and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-09-2001

Subject : PropertyFamily

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960 - Sections 5 and 10(2); Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 - Sections 169 and 171

Reported in : AIR2001SC3067; JT2001(8)SC444; 2001(7)SCALE143; (2001)8SCC599

Advocate for Appellant : E.R. Kumar,; Mrs. Musharraf Chowdhary and; P.H. Parekh, A

ORDER1. This appeal is from the order of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad dated November 24, 1978 disposing of the Writ Petition No. 1054/78 filed by the appellants in terms of the order in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 31 1998

Chandra Shekhar Chaturvedi Vs. Smt. Rajesh Nandini Singh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-31-1998

Subject : Election

Acts : Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 33, 33(4), 36 and 36(8); Representation of the People Act, 1950 - Sections 23 and 127A; Conduct of Election Rules, 1961 - Rule 8

Reported in : AIR2000MP156

Advocate for Appellant : D.N. Shukla, Adv.

ORDERR.S. Garg, J. 1. The present Election petition has been filed by the petitioner claiming himself to be a voter of Assembly constituency No. 83 Kotma to challenge the elections of the said constituency. 2. According...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 04 2008

Nathu Lal Sharma Vs. the Rajasthan State Cooperative Election Tribunal ...

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Apr-04-2008

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Reported in : RLW2008(3)Raj2393

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Chandra Shekhar Sharma

Mohammad Rafiq, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.2. This writ petition has been filed challenging the judgment dated 25.8.2007 passed by Rajasthan State Cooperative Tribunal, Jaipur (for short-the Tribunal). The Tribunal by the said judgment...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 10 2001

Bindeshwari Prasad Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Patna

Decided on : Apr-10-2001

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 324 and 325

Advocate for Appellant : Chandra Shekhar Jha (Amicus Curiae)

Indu Prabha Singh, J.1. Mr. Sunil Kumar counsel for the appellant has stated that he has received no instruction from his client, as such, he does not want to press this application. In such a situation...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 21 2012

Mohd. MoIn Khan Vs. New Delhi Municipal Council

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Decided on : Mar-21-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : For the Applicant: Chandra Shekhar, Advocate. For the Respondent: Ms. Jyoti Singh, senior counsel with Ms. Harvinder Oberoi, Advocate.

DR. VEENA CHHOTRAY: 1. The applicant, a regularly appointed Assistant Law Officer under the NDMC since the year 1999, is seeking the benefit of regular pay scale with all consequential benefits for the period 1990 to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 15 2005

Paharpur Cooling Towers Ltd. Vs. Oswal Chemicals and Fertilizers Ltd.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-15-2005

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rules 24, 96, 99 and 103

Reported in : [2006]134CompCas555(All); [2005]63SCL516(All)

Advocate for Appellant : Amit Prasad, ;Chandra Shekhar and ;M.K. Singh, Advs.

S.P. Mehrotra, J.1. Pursuant to the order dated 3rd February 2005, the case is listed today, peremptorily.2. Sri Amit Prasad, learned counsel for the Petitioner-Company and Sri Piyush Agarwal, learned counsel for the Respondent-Company are present.3....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 10 2005

Sri Azad Chandra Shekher Prasad Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Aug-10-2005

Subject : Service

Acts : Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000; Jharkhand Service Code, 2001 - Rule 74

Reported in : [2005(3)JCR532(Jhr)]

Advocate for Appellant : Chandra Shekhar, Sr. Adv.,; Rana Randhir Singh and; Yash

Altamas Kabir, C.J.1. This writ petition is one of several matters, which have been referred to the Division Bench for hearing and disposal inasmuch as it involves a question regarding invocation of Rule 74(b)(ii) of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial