Advanced Search Results

S.B. Mamle Desai Vs. Controller of Estate Duty and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Estate Duty Act, 1953 - Sections 64 and 64(7); Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; Interest Act, 1839 - Sections 1and 7

Reported in : [1985]155ITR667(KAR); [1985]155ITR667(Karn)

Advocate for Appellant : G. Chandra Kumar, Adv.

Puttaswamy, J.1. One Bullappa Basavanthappa Mamle Desai hereafter referred as B. M. Desai of Dharwad District who was the holder of certain 'watan' property within the meaning of that term occurring in s. 4 of Bombay...

Cinni Foundation Vs. Raj Kumar Sah and Sons and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade Marks Act, 1999 - Sections 2, 28, 29, 35, 40, 45, 45(1), 45(2), 57(1), 134 and 135; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 151 - Order 1, Rule 11 - Order 7, Rule 11 - Order 39, Rules 1, 2 and 4

Reported in : 2009(41)PTC320(Del)

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Bansal an; Akshay Srivastava, Advs

Reva Khetrapal, J.1. By this order, it is proposed to decide IA Nos. 5726/2009 (under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 CPC filed by the plaintiff), 6870/2009 (under Order VII Rule 11...

Rajata Trust Vs. Chief Commissioner of Income-tax and Others

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(14), 2(47), 7(1), 269UA, 269UD, 269UD(1), 269UD(2), 269UE, 269UE(2), 269UF, 269UG, 269UG(1), 269UG(3), 269UL and 269UL(3)

Reported in : (1991)97CTR(Kar)97; ILR1991KAR2350; 1991(2)KarLJ612

Advocate for Appellant : Srinivasan, Adv.

S. Mohan, C.J. 1. The short facts leading to the appeal are as under : The appellant entered into an agreement with the third respondent for the purchase of an immovable property herein described as Mohan...

Muthineni Krishna Rao and Others Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15, 15(4), 16, 16(4), 21, 32, 32-A, 35, 136, 141, 143, 217, 225, 226, 227, 309, 323 (A, A(2), B and B(3)), 356, 368 and 371-D; Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - Sections 1 to 4, 5, 6, 6(2 and 3), 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 13((1-A) and 2), 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 20(2), 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 29-A, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 36-A and 37; Andhra Pradesh Direct Recruitment for Posts of Teachers (Scheme of Selection) Rules, 1994 - Rules 2, 3, 12, 13, 13(1), 14 and 15 to 19; Andhra Pradesh Public Employment (Organisation of Local Cadres and Regulation of Direct Recruitment) Order, 1975; Andhra Pradesh Education Act, 1982 - Sections 78 and 79; Andhra Pradesh Panchayats Raj Act, 1994 - Sections 169(4), 195(4) and 268; Presiden

Reported in : 1998(6)ALD378; 1998(5)ALT772

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. K.R. Prabhakar, Adv.

ORDERB. Subhashan Reddy, J.1. These writ petitions relate to service jurisprudence and raise several important questions of law, both Constitutional and statutory. After the decision of the Supreme Court in L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of...

Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi and Others Vs. Union ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

G. Rohini, C.J. 1. Though based on different set of facts, the controversy in all the petitions centers on common issues relating to the exercise of legislative power and executive control in the administration of National...

Vasavadatta Cement Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (2002)(84)ECC383

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Chandra Kumar

1. This appeal arises out of and is directed against the impugned order dated 27.11.2001 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Belgaum.2.The appellants are engaged in the manufacture of cement and clinker falling under Chapter...

Kirloskar Computer Service Ltd. Vs. Uoi and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act - Sections 2 and 11C; Constitution of India - Article 226; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985

Reported in : 1998(98)ELT355(Kar)

Advocate for Appellant : Shri G. Chandra Kumar, Adv.

ORDERShri Tirath S. Thakur, J. 1. In this petition for a writ of certiorari the petitioner company calls in question the validity of a Notice issued by the Collector of Central Excise, Bangalore; thereby the petitioner...

S.Andrews Ponnuraj Vairamani Vs. the Chief Secretary and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Administrative Tribunals Act - Sections 14(1)(a), 14(1)(b); Constitution of India - Articles 226, 227, 32, 323-A; Central Administrative Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1987 - Rule 17

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.M.Saravankaumar, Adv.

In this Writ Petition, the petitioner seeks for a direction to consider his representation and include his name in the panel for promotion and Conferment of Indian Administrative Service yearwise for the year 2011 under Non-State...

M/S. Premier Irrigation Equipments Limited, Bangalore Vs. Union of Ind ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35-L; Constitution of India - Articles 32, 226, 227, 323-A(2) and 323-B(3); Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Customs and Excise Revenues Appellate Tribunal Act, 1986 - Sections 26

Reported in : 1998(59)ECC489; 1998(100)ELT29(Kar); ILR1998KAR1235; 1998(2)KarLJ652

Advocate for Appellant : Sri G. Chander Kumar, Senior Counsel and ;Sri Rajesh Chandra Kumar, Adv.

ORDERG.C. Bharuka, J.1. The petitioner is a limited company. It is engaged in the manufacture, sale and marketing of sprinkler irrigation system including pumps and motors which are used in the agricultural fields for irrigational purposes....

Mico Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (2002)(82)ECC97

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Rajesh Chandra Kumar

1. Shri Rajesh Chandra Kumar appearing for the appellants submitted that he was instructed by the appellants to challenge only the question of time bar issue. In this context he referred to the reply given by...