Advanced Search Results

Joharimal and ors. Vs. Fatehchand and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 34

Reported in : AIR1960Raj67

Advocate for Appellant : Chandmal, Adv.

Chhangani, J. 1. This is a defendant's appeal under Section 39(1)(v) of the Indian Arbitration Act (Act No. X of 1940) (hereinafter referred to as the Act), against the order dated 9-3-1956 of the Senior Civil...

Uttam Kumar Vs. Chandmal And, anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : 1993ACJ478

Advocate for Appellant : B.N. Kalla and; S.A. Johari and; Bhagwati Parsad, Ad

Milap Chandra Jain, J.1. These appeals have been filed against the common award of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Udaipur, dated 24th January, 1985, by which Rs. 15,200/- has been awarded as compensation to the claimant-respondent...

Chandmal Vs. the State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1983WLN(UC)287

K.S. Lodha, J.1. All three revisions arise out of the same case and, therefore, they are being disposed of by a common order.2. The facts giving rise to these three revisions briefly stated are that a...

Oriental Fire and Genl. Ins. Co. Ltd. Vs. Harak Chand and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : 1992ACJ730

Advocate for Appellant : B.N. Kalla,; Bhagwati Prasad and; S.A. Johari, Advs.

Milap Chandra Jain, J. 1. These appeals have been filed against the common award of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Udaipur dated January 24, 1985 by which Rs. 15,200/- has been awarded as compensation to the...

Uttam Kumar Vs. Chandmal and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : InsuranceMotor Vehicles

Reported in : 2(1993)ACC325

Milap Chandra Jain, J.1. These appeals have been filed against the common award of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Udaipur, dated 24th January, 1985, by which Rs. 15,200/- has been awarded as compensation to the claimant-respondent...

Thanmal Surana and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3, 3(2), 3(3), 3(3A), 3(5) and 5; Constitution of India - Articles 19, 19(1), 19(5), 19(6), 31(2), 105 and 245; Gram (Rajasthan) Price Control Order, 1958

Reported in : AIR1959Raj206

Advocate for Appellant : Laxmimal, Adv. for Petitioners in Cases Nos. 108, 118, 242 to 258 and 264 of 1958 and; Chandmal, Adv.

Sarjoo Prosad, C.J.1. These petitions for writs have been presented by certain commission agents and grain merchants of Ganganagar District. The common question raised in these applications is the constitutional validity of Sections 3 and 5...

Municipal Board of Abu Road Vs. Jaishiv and ors

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Rajasthan Municipalities Act, 1959 - Sections 104(1); Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : AIR1988SC388; JT1987(4)SC176; 1987(2)SCALE832; 1987(Supp)SCC301; [1988]1SCR584; [1988]68STC356(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : V.M. Tarkunde, Tapas C. Ray and Chandmal Lodh

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal Nos. 2255-56 of 1979.From the Judgment and order dated 20.12.1978 of the Rajasthan High Court in Special Appeal Nos. 40 and 39 of196.V.M. Tarkunde, Tapas C. Ray, Chandmal Lodha, S.K. Jain,...

Abas and ors. Vs. Sheolal and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 95

Reported in : AIR1951Raj26

Advocate for Appellant : Chandmal, Adv.

Nawal Kishore, C.J.1. This is a plaintiffs' first appeal from the judgment of the learned District Judge dismissing the suit as premature and, therefore, not maintainable. The point involved in this appeal lies within a narrow...

Tejraj Chhogalal Gandhi and anr. Vs. State of Madhya Bharat and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 25, 52(1), 25(2), 26, 32 and 226

Reported in : AIR1958MP115

Advocate for Appellant : N.P. Engineer, ;D.P. Bhargav, ;Taraporewalla, ;Yaghsingh, ;C.S. Chhazed and ;Barjatia, Advs.

ORDER1. These are two petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of an appropriate writ or direction to the opponents for the removal of a Shivling (a representation of Hindu...

Firm Seth Hiralal Hazarilal Vs. Jagan Nath

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 22; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 30, Rule 2; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 45

Reported in : AIR1957Raj298

Advocate for Appellant : P.C. Bhandari, Adv.

Bapna, J.1. This is an appeal against the judgment of the learned District Judge Baran, dated 14-12-49, by the plaintiff in a suit for recovery of money.2. The suit was originally instituted by Hazarl-lal describing himself...