Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: chandmal lodha · Page 1 of about 11 results (0.037 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 27 1987

Municipal Board of Abu Road Vs. Jaishiv and ors

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-27-1987

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Rajasthan Municipalities Act, 1959 - Sections 104(1); Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : AIR1988SC388; JT1987(4)SC176; 1987(2)SCALE832; 1987(Supp)SCC301; [1988]1SCR584; [1988]68STC356(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : V.M. Tarkunde, Tapas C. Ray and Chandmal Lodh

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal Nos. 2255-56 of 1979.From the Judgment and order dated 20.12.1978 of the Rajasthan High Court in Special Appeal Nos. 40 and 39 of196.V.M. Tarkunde, Tapas C. Ray, Chandmal Lodha, S.K. Jain,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 02 1959

Thanmal Surana and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Apr-02-1959

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3, 3(2), 3(3), 3(3A), 3(5) and 5; Constitution of India - Articles 19, 19(1), 19(5), 19(6), 31(2), 105 and 245; Gram (Rajasthan) Price Control Order, 1958

Reported in : AIR1959Raj206

Advocate for Appellant : Laxmimal, Adv. for Petitioners in Cases Nos. 108, 118, 242 to 258 and 264 of 1958 and; Chandmal, Adv.

Sarjoo Prosad, C.J.1. These petitions for writs have been presented by certain commission agents and grain merchants of Ganganagar District. The common question raised in these applications is the constitutional validity of Sections 3 and 5...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 22 1960

Dashrat and ors. Vs. the State

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jul-22-1960

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1961CriLJ403

ORDERL.N. Chhangani, J.1. This is a reference by the Sessions Judge, Merta recommending that the order of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Parbatsar dated 26-6-58, purporting to have been passed under Section 137 Cr. P.C. should be set...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 05 1966

Chhatar Singh Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Sep-05-1966

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 52, 53, 74, 77 and 311(2); Government of India (Allocation of Business) Rules, 1961 - Rule 2; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(8) and 3(23)

Reported in : AIR1967Raj194; (1968)ILLJ483Raj

Advocate for Appellant : Chandmal Lodha, Adv.

ORDER: The President is satisfied that the retention of Shri Chattar Singh, Assistant Engineer, Northern Railway Jodhpur, in service is prejudicial to National security and that the said Shri Chattar Singh ought to be removed from...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 30 1965

Amar Chand Vs. Bach Raj and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jul-30-1965

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 12; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100 to 101

Reported in : AIR1966Raj111

Advocate for Appellant : Chandmal Lodha and; H.M. Lodha, Advs.

D.S. Dave, C.J.1. This appeal came for hearing before a learned Single Judge of this Court on 23-10-64, but since an important question of law relating to the period of limitation was involved, he referred it...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 11 1964

Mahant Bhagwandas Vs. Suggan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Nov-11-1964

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 145(1), 145(3) and 145(4)

Reported in : AIR1965Raj143; 1965CriLJ242

Advocate for Appellant : Chandmal Lodha,; L.K. Swami and; H.M. Lodha, Advs.

ORDERL.N. Chhangani, J. 1. These eight references by the Additional District Magistrate, Alwar, should conveniently be disposed of by a common order. 2. The facts in each of them are similar though not Identical. The petitioner...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 05 1963

Karan Raj and anr. Vs. Chunnilal and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Apr-05-1963

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 58; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 101 to 103; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 34 and 100 to 101; Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 49; Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Article 66

Reported in : AIR1964Raj72

Advocate for Appellant : Chandmal Lodha, Adv.

I.N. Modi, J. 1. This is a civil regular second appeal by the defendants against the judgment and decree of the District Judge, Balotra, dated the 21st December, 1957, in a suit for mortgage money and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 08 1964

Vastulal Pareek Vs. Pareek Commercial Bank Ltd.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jan-08-1964

Subject : BankingCivil

Acts : Court-fees Act, 1870 - Schedule - Articles 1 and 11; Banking Companies Act - Sections 45B and 45T

Reported in : AIR1964Raj202

Advocate for Appellant : Chandmal Lodha, Adv.

Modi, J.1. The only question which has been raised for our decision in this appeal at this stage is whether the court-fee of Rs. 2/- paid by the appellant Vastulal on the memorandum of appeal is...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 09 1964

ShyamnaraIn Sharma Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Oct-09-1964

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 311(2); Railway Establishment Code - Rule 1712(3)

Reported in : AIR1965Raj87

Advocate for Appellant : Chandmal Lodha and; J.P. Jain, Advs.

D.S. Dave, C.J.1. This is a writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by one Shyamnarain Sharma challenging the validity of the order of his dismissal from service dated the 27th April, 1962.2....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 20 1967

Fateh Raj and anr. Vs. Suraj Roop and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jan-20-1967

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 1, Rule 10(2)

Reported in : AIR1969Raj252; 1968()WLN169

Advocate for Appellant : Chandmal Lodha, Adv.

ORDERJagat Narayan, J. 1. This is a revision application by Fateh Raj and Vijai Raj against an order of Munsif, City Jodhpur, refusing to implead them as defendants in a suit brought by Suraj Roop respondent...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial