Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: chandan mishra · Page 1 of about 17 results (0.043 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 26 2003

Priya Paul Yedluri Vs. Ntr University of Health Sciences and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-26-2003

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Unaided Non-minority Professional Institutions (Regulation of Admissions into Undergraduate Medical and Dental Professional Courses) Rules, 2003

Reported in : 2004(1)ALD603; 2004(3)ALT125

Advocate for Appellant : P. Ravi, P. Jogayya Sarma, Nooty Ramamohan Rao, C. Kodandaram, B. Adinarayana Rao, K. Rama Kantha Reddy, K.G.K. Prasad, P. Krishna Reddy, E. Ajay Reddy, K.G. Krishna Murthy and C.V. Mohan Reddy for J.

ORDERA. Gopal Reddy, J.1. All these writ petitions can be dealt with under a common order, since the controversy in all the writ petitions is inter-linked with one another.2. The Supreme Court in Convener, MBBS/BDS Selection...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 08 2017

Chandan Mishra vs.union of India & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-08-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved On:2. d February, 2017 Judgment Pronounced On:8. h May, 2017 + W.P. (CRL) 1088/2015 CHANDAN MISHRA ....... Petitioner Through : Mr.Sanjeev Sahay,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 16 2026

Chandan Mishra Dwivedi vs Union of India & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-16-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, Mr. Ashim Shridhar, Ms. Radhika Gupta, Mr. Ripudaman Bhardwaj, Mr. Kushagra Kumar, Mr. Amit Kumar Rana

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5038/2026 and CM APPL. 24782/2026, CM APPL.CHANDAN MISHRA DWIVEDI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Ashim Shridhar and Ms. Radhika Gupta, Advs.versusUNION...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 19 2017

Jasmeet Kaur vs.navtej Singh

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-19-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Jayant Bhatt, Mr. Vipan Kumar, Ms. Jyoti Sharma

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 3/2017 and CM APPL. 896-897/2017, 899/2017 IN THE MATTER OF: JASMEET KAUR NAVTEJ SINGH Reserved on:29. 08.2017 Date of decision:19. 09.2017 Through: Mr. Jayant...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 23 1998

Dr. Pranab Mohapatra and ors. Vs. State of Orissa, Represented Through ...

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Dec-23-1998

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India, 1950 - 14, 226 and 227

Reported in : 1999(I)OLR292

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Dash, S.B. Jena, P.K. Misra, S. Behera, S.S. Mohapatra, A.K. Patra, B.N. Sadangi, G. Mukherjee, P. Mukherjee, J.K. Khuntia, H.K. Rout, B. Routray, B. Dash, A.K. Baral, P.K. Dash, D.K. Mohapatra,

A. Pasayat, J.1. These writ applications along with large number of others have been filed questioning legality of the process of selection of candidates for prosecuting Post-Graduate Studies in the Government colleges of the State. As...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 01 2022

Subhash Vs. The State Of Uttar Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-01-2022

Subject : Criminal

Advocate for Appellant : MANJU JETLEY __

Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Appeal No 158 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (Crl) No 1691 of 2020) Subhash Appellant Versus State of Uttar Pradesh Respondent W I T...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 25 2003

K.N. Mishra Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jul-25-2003

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 47, Rule 5 and 8; ;Calcutta High Court Appellate Side Rules,1957 - Rules 1 and 3; ;Calcutta High Court (Extension of Jurisdiction) Act, 1953 - Section 3

Reported in : AIR2003Cal307

Advocate for Appellant : Tapan Kumar Mukherjee, ;Chandan Mishra, ;Dipankar Ghosh and ;Tapas Kumar Ghosal, Advs.

Pravendu Narayan Sinha, J.(For himself and on behalf of Asok Kumar Ganguly, Aloke Chakrabarti and Pravendu Narayan Sinha, JJ.)1. This reference originates from a writ petition filed before the Circuit Bench at Port Blair against an...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 11 2003

Bimal Kumar Mishra and anr. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-11-2003

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 21 and 226

Reported in : (2004)1CALLT250(HC)

Advocate for Appellant : Chandan Mishra, Adv.

M. Sinha, J. 1. The first writ petitioner herein is the father of the second writ petitioner. The first writ petitioner on or about 23rd March, 1973, was appointed as a Shramik in the Debagram Group...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 02 2008

Purnendu Biswas Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : May-02-2008

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 16(1) and 21

Advocate for Appellant : Chandan Mishra, Adv. in W.P. Nos. 12409(W) of 2001 and 409(W) of 2003 and ;Tulsidas Roy, Adv. in W.P. No. 12311(W) of 2001

Pratap Kumar Ray, J.1. Writ application being W.P. 409 (W) of 2003 filed by Sri Purnendu Biswas seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the respondents to delete the name of respondent No. 6, Sri Sukhen Sarkar...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 21 2001

Jimmy Abraham Thomas and ors. Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-21-2001

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 3; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 226 and 266; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 1, Rule 8; Dentists Act, 1948 - Sections 10A and 10B(3); Indian Medical Councils Act, 1956 - Sections 10A, 10A(1), 10A(2), 10A(7), 10B, 10B(1), 10C, 20 and 33; Indian Medicine Central Council Act, 1970 - Sections 3; Medical Council (Amendment) Act, 1993

Reported in : 2002(1)ALLMR1; 2002(3)BomCR219

Advocate for Appellant : V.C. Kotwal, Senior Advocate, ;Gulam E. Vahanvati, Advocate General, ;A.A. Kumbhakoni, Special Counsel, ;Armin Kalyanram, A.G.P., ; Sunip Sen, A. Wani and Mehul Shah, Advs. i/b., Little & Co.,

H. L. Gokhale, J.1. All the writ petitions in Group (A) above invoking Article 226 of the Constitution of India raise common questions with respect to the correctness and legality of the Maharashtra Health Sciences Common...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial