Advanced Search Results

Mahesh Alias Tulsi Harijan Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 300 and 302

Reported in : 2004CriLJ1087

Advocate for Appellant : Manish Datt, Adv.

Dipak Misra, J.1. Marriage was conceived as an institution to save the race of home sapiens from the tyranny of sex, but, in the case at hand, as the factual matrix depicts, the accused/appellant (hereinafter referred...

Suresh NaraIn Vs. the Food Inspector and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 7, 13(2), 13(2B), 13(2C), 13(2D), 13(3) and 16

Reported in : 2002(5)MPHT559; 2003(2)MPLJ120

Advocate for Appellant : Surendra Singh, Sr. Adv. and ;Ashwani Dubey, Adv.;Chanchal Sharma, Panel Lawyer

ORDERUma Nath Singh, J.1. Heard the Counsel for the parties and perused the records.The criminal revision impugns framing of charges by the learned C.J.M., Raisen in regular Trial No. 482/97 for offence under Section 7/16/16(i) of...

Akash Chaudhary vs State Nct of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Raj Kumar, Mr. Ajay Singh, Mr. Kamal Chaudhary, Mr. Aman Chaudhary, Mr. Vipin Naagar, Ms. Chanchal Sharma

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 1726/2026 & CRL.M.A. 13972/2026 AKASH CHAUDHARY .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Raj Kumar, Mr. Ajay Singh, Mr. Kamal Chaudhary, Mr. Aman Chaudhary, Mr. Vipin Naagar and...

Sh. Vishal & Ors. vs State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi) & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Chanchal Sharma, Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 1427/2026 SH. VISHAL & ORS. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Chanchal Sharma, Advocate with Petitioners in person.versusSTATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr....

State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Mehboob Khan and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 141, 148, 149, 302 and 307

Reported in : 2002(1)MPHT241; 2002(1)MPLJ611

Advocate for Appellant : Chanchal Sharma, Panel Lawyer

Uma Nath Singh, J. 1. The State has preferred this appeal against the impugned judgment and order dated 16-9-89, passed by the Fourth Additional Sessions Judge, Bhopal in Session Trial No. 103/85, where by accused Farookh...

Uttam Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Advocate for Appellant : Smt. Chanchal Sharma, Smt. Chanchala Sharma

1 Cr.A. No.1090 of 2007 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH: HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUBHASH KAKADE CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1090 of 2007 APPELLANT : Uttam S/o Sitaram Yadav Aged 25 years, R/o Village Madavan...

Shri Khailesh Garg vs.m/s Abhipra Capital Limited and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

Advocate for Appellant : Ms. Chanchal Sharma

$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:22. d November, 2018 + O.M.P. 244/2009 SHRI KHAILESH GARG ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Chanchal Sharma, Advocate (M- 9811652421). versus M/S ABHIPRA CAPITAL...

Deviram and ors. Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 30, 34, 34(1) and 58AG; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 41(1); Constitution of India - Article 145; Madhya Pradesh High Court Rules - Rule 34(2); ;Madhya Pradesh High Court Orders - Sections 1 and 2

Reported in : 2005(3)MPHT182

Advocate for Appellant : Y.K. Gupta and ;Chanchal Sharma, Advs.

ORDERDipak Misra, J.1. It had been stated long back that there is a beginning in the end and the aforesaid sentence, it we are permitted to say so, has travelled beyond the philosophical and mystical realm...

Mangilal and anr. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 201 and 302; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 118

Reported in : 2004(1)MPHT138

Advocate for Appellant : Rajendra Singh, Sr. Adv.

Dipak Misra, J.1. In this appeal preferred under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (in short 'the Code') the accused/appellants (hereinafter referred to as 'the accused') have called in question the sustainability of the...

Umashankar Namdev Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 378 and 379

Reported in : 2003(2)MPHT237

Advocate for Appellant : Siddharth Datt, Adv.

ORDERA.K. Shrivastava, J.1. This revision petition has been directed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 10-2-94, passed by Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Panna, in Criminal Case No. 34/1993, convicting the applicant under...