Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: cama · Page 1 of about 1,458 results (0.182 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 17 2009

Bhuwalka Steel Indus. Ltd. Vs. Bombay Iron and Steel Labour Bd. and an ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-17-2009

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Mathadi, Hamal and other Manual Workers (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) Act, 1969 - Sections 1, 2, 2(2), 2(11), 2(12), 4, 6, 14, 15, 15(2), 18, 19, 20, 21 and 22; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2; Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 - Sections 3(13), 3(14), 17G and 44; Security Guards Act; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 147, 145 and 149; Central Sales Tax Act - Sections 8(3); Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923; Payment of Wages Act, 1936; Maternity Benefit Act, 1961; Madhya Pradesh Nagar Tatha Gram Nivesh Adhiniyam - Sections 50(1); Constitution of India - Articles 141, 254 and 254(2)

Reported in : 2010(1)BomCR656; JT2009(15)SC269; (2010)ILLJ561SC; 2009(14)SCALE623; (2010)2SCC273; 2009(10)LC5041(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : Jamshed P. Cama (NP),; Chander Uday Singh (NP),; K.K. Singhv

V.S. Sirpurkar, J.1. This judgment will dispose of SLP (Civil) No. 1982 of 2007, SLP (Civil) No. 3624 of 2007, SLP (Civil).... CC No. 4065 of 2007, SLP (Civil).... CC No. 4046 of 2007, SLP (Civil)...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 02 1999

H.N. Desai and Others Vs. M/S. Bhor Industries Ltd. and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-02-1999

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 28; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39, Rule 1 & 2; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25-O, K & N

Reported in : 1999(4)ALLMR613; 2000(1)BomCR500; (2000)ILLJ1278Bom

Advocate for Appellant : J.P. Cama i/b ;Sanjay Udeshi & Co., Advs.

ORDERH.L. Gokhale, J.1. The petitioners herein are workmen working under the respondent No. 1 Company. They have filed this petition being aggrieved by the order dated 12th August, 1999 passed by a member of the Industrial...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 12 2008

Mrs. Sarita S. Melwani, Proprietress Carrying on Business in the Firm ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-12-2008

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Shops and Establishment Act; Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labor Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 44; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 25B, 25B(1), 25B(2), 25F and 25G; Payment of Gratuity Act; Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946; Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act

Reported in : 2008(5)BomCR901; (2008)110BOMLR1997; (2009)ILLJ116Bom

Advocate for Appellant : J.P. Cama, Sr. Adv., i/b., Sanjay Udeshi & Co.

V.M. Kanade, J.1. Appellant has filed this appeal challenging the judgment and Order passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No. 3969 of 2007 dated 30/11 / 2007 whereby the learned Single Judge was...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 18 2002

Prabhakar Engineers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Ramchandra Baburao Mohite and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-18-2002

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 11A; Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1972 - Sections 59

Reported in : 2003(3)ALLMR596; 2003(4)BomCR412; 2003(2)MhLj823

Advocate for Appellant : J.P. Cama, Adv., i/b., K.P. Anilkumar, Adv.

S. Radhakrishna, J.1. By this petition the petitioner employer is challenging part I of the Award dated 29-6-1994 and part II of the Award dated 23-2-1995 passed by the II Labour Court, Pune in the Reference...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 04 2008

Suman V. JaIn (Dr.) Vs. Marwadi Sammelan and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-04-2008

Subject : Service

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 115; Constitution of India - Articles 226, 217(1) 227 and 299; Government Service Conduct Rules; Delhi School Education Rules - Rule 114A; Punjab National Bank (Officers) Service Regulations, 1979 - Regulation 20(2)

Reported in : 2008(6)BomCR808

Advocate for Appellant : J.P. Cama, Sr. Counsel a/w., ;Mihir Desai and ;Alok Gupta, Advs.

Majmudar P.B., J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order of the learned Single Judge dated 8-8-2006 passed in Writ Petition No. 1611 of 2004 (Suman V. Jain v. Marwadi Sammelan) 2006 B.C.I. 156...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 13 2006

Bajaj Auto Limited Vs. Shri Shrikant Vinayak Yogi and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-13-2006

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 28(1); Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2006(4)ALLMR181; 2006(4)BomCR197; 2006(3)MhLj557

Advocate for Appellant : J.P. Cama, Sr. Counsel and ;Swati Deshpande, Adv. i/b., M.S. Bodhanwalla and Co.

V.C. Daga, J. 1. Rule, returnable forthwith by consent of parties. Heard rival parties. Perused petition and documents annexed thereto. 2. This petition is directed against the interim order dated 23rd December, 2005 passed below Exh.U-2...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 07 2005

Bajaj Auto Limited Vs. Shri Ashok Dnyanoba Dhumal and

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-07-2005

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 25B, 25B(2), 25F and 25N; Delhi Shops and Establishments Act, 1954 - Sections 16 to 18; Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 51, 52, 54, 59, 79 and 80; Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 3(1) and 5(2); Maharashtra Factories Rules, 1963; Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : 2006(1)ALLMR460; 2006(2)BomCR625; 2006(1)MhLj147

Advocate for Appellant : J.P. Cama and ;Swati V. Deshpande, Advs., i/b., ;Bodhanwala and Co.

B.H. Marlapalle, J.1. This petition filed by the employer-company takes exception to the award passed by the First Labour Court at Pune in Reference (IDA) No. 36 of 1990 directing to reinstate the respondent-workman on his...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 10 2005

Capt. Vishal Capoor and ors. Vs. Air India Limited and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-10-2005

Subject : ServiceCommercial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 18(3), 19, 19(2) and 19(6); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 21, 226 and 227; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 11

Reported in : 2005(3)BomCR566; [2005(106)FLR679]; 2005(3)MhLj154

Advocate for Appellant : J.P. Cama, Senior Adv., i/b., K.P. Anilkumar, Adv.;P.M. Palshikar, Adv. for Indian Pilots Guild

S.C. Dharmadhikari, J.1. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioners who are pilots challenge an order passed on 30th September 2004 by the first respondent and further seek a writ of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 04 2001

Hindustan Coca Cola Bottling S/W Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Narayan Rawal ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : May-04-2001

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 12, 24, 25, 28, 30, 44, 59 and 60; Constitution of India - Articles 38, 39, 42, 43, 43-A, 142 and 226; Contract Labour (R & A) Act, 1970 - Sections 10; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2 and 10(1)

Reported in : 2001(4)ALLMR302; 2001(4)BomCR402; (2001)3BOMLR817; [2001(90)FLR150]; (2001)IILLJ502Bom

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. J.P. Cama, Adv.

ORDERR.J. Kochar, J.1. The following two latest judgments of the Supreme Court have given rise to the present litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before this Court.(i) Vividh Kamgar Sabha v. Kalyani Steels...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 13 1991

Shalimar Wires and Industries Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-13-1991

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 8(1)

Reported in : 1992(58)ELT44(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Shri J.P. Cama and ;Shri Y.B. Pandya, Advs.

Pendse, J.1. By this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners are challenging the concurrent findings recorded by the three authorities constituted under the Excise Act. Only few facts are required...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial