Advanced Search Results
M/s. Sri Gayathri Enterprises, Salem Vs. The Assistant Commissioner (C ...
Chennai
Aug-08-2016
Land Acquisition
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of Writ of Certiorari to call for records from the files of the respondent in TIN No.33162802382/2007-08, dated 01.06.2016, received on 25.06.2016,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBijili and Company Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu
Chennai
Jul-23-1973
Sales Tax
[1974]34STC461(Mad)
C. Venkatraman, Adv. of ;C.S. Chandrasekara Sastri, ;C. Venkatraman, ;C. Natarajan, ;D. Srinivasan and ;S.R. Kumaraswami, Advs.
Ramanujam, J. 1. The two points that arise for consideration in these two cases are: (1) Whether the transactions carried on by the petitioners would amount to sale of batteries attracting liability to sales tax ;...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskA.N. Anthony Packia Nadar Vs. Commissioner of Agricultural Income-tax ...
Chennai
Nov-18-1980
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(1A)
[1982]135ITR527(Mad)
N. Inbarajan, Adv. for ;C.S. Chandrasekhara Sastry, ;C. Venkatraman and ;C. Natarajan, Advs.
Padmanabhan, J. 1. The short question that arises for consideration in this case is whether the income derived from the cutting and sale of Odai trees will fall within the meaning of agricultural income as defined...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Sri Balaji Trading Company Vs. Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Mettur R ...
Chennai
Mar-24-1988
Sales Tax
Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 - Sections 31(5)
[1989]72STC417(Mad)
C. Natarajan, ;C. Subbaraya Aiyar, ;C. Venkatraman, ;R. Venkataraman, ;B. Kumar and ;B. Kumar, Advs.
Sivasubramaniam, J.1. When these batch of writ petitions came up for admission, this Court held that the High Court should not normally interfere with the discretionary orders passed by the appellate authority constituted under the Tamil...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSri Balaji Trading Co. Vs. Deputy Commercial Tax Officer and anr.
Chennai
Mar-24-1988
Direct Taxation
Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 - Sections 31(5)
[1989]175ITR428(Mad)
C. Natarajan, Adv. in W.P. Nos. 2939 to 2941 of 1988, ;C. Subbaraya Aiyar, Adv. in W.P. Nos. 2980 and 2981 of 1988, ;C. Venkatraman, Adv. in W.P. Nos. 2977 and 3003 of 1988, ;R. Venkataraman, Adv. i
Sivasubramaniam, J.1. When these batch of writ petitions came up for admission, this court held that the High Court should not normally interfere with the discretionary orders passed by the appellate authority constituted under the Tamil...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEltex Engineering Corporation Private Ltd. Vs. the Joint Commercial Ta ...
Chennai
Aug-04-1971
Sales Tax
[1973]30STC146(Mad)
C. Venkatraman, Adv.
ORDERRamaprasada Rao, J.1. The petitioners are dealers in electrical motors, agricultural pump-sots, etc. They sold 'electrical motors to Messrs. Elgi Equipments Private Limited, Coimbatore, who in their turn gave what is popularly known as form XVII...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTrichur Cotton Mills Limited Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Chennai
Jan-05-1990
Sales Tax
[1990]77STC162(Mad)
Inbarajan, Adv., for M/s C.S. Chandrasekara Sastry, ;C. Venkatraman and ;C. Natarajan, Advs.
1. These two tax cases arise out of a common order of the Tamil Nadu Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal (Additional Bench), Madurai, dated 22nd February, 1979 and made in T.A. Nos. 881 and 882 of 1977....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTextool Company Limited Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu
Chennai
Sep-30-1977
Sales Tax
[1978]42STC68(Mad)
N. Inbarajan, Adv. for ;C.S. Chandrasekara Sastri, ;C. Venkatraman, ;C. Natarajan and ;S. Chandrasekaran, Advs.
P. Govindan Nair, C.J.1. This is an appeal by the assessee against the order of the Board of Revenue imposing tax on the disputed turnover of Rs. 6,39,244.76 under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 (Act...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJ.K. Mullick Vs. the State of Madras
Chennai
Jul-31-1972
Sales Tax
[1973]30STC443(Mad)
C. Venkatraman, Adv.
Ramanujam, J.1. The question involved in this case is as to whether the petitioner is entitled to the benefit of concessional rate of tax under Section 3(3) of the Madras General Sales Tax Act. It is...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK.A. Ramachar Vs. the State of Madras
Chennai
Aug-09-1972
Sales Tax
[1973]31STC598(Mad)
C. Venkatraman, Adv.
Ramanujam, J.1. In this tax case, the turnover disputed by the assessee is a sum of Rs. 1,63,843.93. This turnover represents the cost of fabrication, supply and erection of trusses, purlins, etc., made by the assessee...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »