Advanced Search Results
S. Venkataraman Vs. the State of Madras
Chennai
Sep-22-1964
Sales Tax
[1965]16STC752(Mad)
C. Venkataraman and ;G. Subramaniam, Advs.
Srinivasan, J.1. The petitioner in these two revisions is the proprietor of a construction company. He had acquired the right of removing sand from certain areas of Cooum river in an auction conducted by the Revenue...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State of Tamil Nadu Vs. Thakorebhai and Brothers
Chennai
Feb-15-1982
Sales Tax
Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 - Sections 36(6) and 55
[1983]52STC104(Mad)
K.S. Bakthavatsalam, Additional Government Pleader
Padmanabhan, J. 1. The tax cases and writ petitions are being disposed of by this common judgment. The Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Madurai, is the petitioner in the tax revision cases and also in the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskC.Venkataraman and Another Vs. the Deputy Tahsildar (Rr), Thiruvananth ...
Kerala
Feb-04-2013
Land Acquisition
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2013 15TH MAGHA 193 WP(C).No. 5497 of 2011 (J) -------------------------- PETITIONERS: ------------ 1. C.VENKATARAMAN, S/O.CHIDAMBARAKRISHNA IYER,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
D. Sreenivasappa Vs. the State of Madras
Chennai
Jun-24-1964
CivilSales Tax
[1964]15STC784(Mad)
C. Venkataraman, Adv.
Ramakrishnan, J.1. After the assessment was made on the dealer for the year 1958-59 an anamath account was recovered and it showed entries betwen 22nd May, 1958, and 30th May, 1958, which led to the inference...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskP.S. Subramania Chettiar and Sons Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Chennai
Feb-05-1976
Sales Tax
[1977]39STC103(Mad)
R. Venkataraman, Adv. for ;V. Rajagopalan, ;C. Venkataraman and ;S. Chandrasekaran, Advs.
V. Ramaswami, J.1. The assessees are dealers in paddy and rice. For the assessment year 1961-62, they returned a total and taxable turnover of Rs. 1,58,289.50 and Rs. 1,56,713.48 respectively. On a check of accounts, it...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGovindan and Co. Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu
Chennai
Feb-20-1974
Sales Tax
[1975]35STC50(Mad)
C. Venkataraman, Adv. of C.S. Chandrasekara Sastri, C. Venkataraman and C. Natarajan, Advs.
Ramanujam, J.1. This revision is directed against the order of remand made by the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal. The petitioners herein reported a total and taxable turnover of Rs. 18,17,325.20 and Rs. 223.42 respectively for the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKalyani Oil Mills Vs. the State of Madras
Chennai
Jan-30-1973
Sales Tax
[1973]32STC542(Mad)
C. Venkataraman of ;C.S. Chandrasekhara Sastri, ;C. Venkataraman, ;C. Natarajan and ;D. Srinivasan, Advs.
Ramanujam, J.1. The assessee in this case is a manufacturer and dealer in groundnut oil. For the assessment years 1963-64 and 1964-65, he was assessed on a taxable turnover of Rs. 5,19,349.92 and Rs. 4,98,647.59 respectively...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRatna Cafe Vs. the State of Madras
Chennai
Jul-02-1973
Sales Tax
[1974]33STC39(Mad)
C. Venkataraman, Adv. of C.S. Chandrasekhara Sastry, ;C. Venkataraman, ;C. Natarajan ;and D. Srinivasan, Advs.
Ramanujam, J.1. The question that arises in this case is as to whether the estimate of the turnover is justified. The assessee, who is running a coffee hotel, reported a taxable turnover of Rs. 7,19,025.09 for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM. Jeewajee and Co. Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu
Chennai
Jul-10-1973
Sales Tax
[1974]34STC4(Mad)
C. Venkataraman, Adv. of ;C.S. Chandrasekara Sastri, ;C. Venkataraman, ;C. Natarajan and ;M.R. Srinivasan, Advs.
Ramanujam, J. 1. The assessees in this case are dealers in cotton canvas, tarpaulins, aluminium beedings, etc. In the course of the assessment for the assessment year 1968-69 the assessees claimed exemption in relation to their...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDeputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Tiruchirapalli Division Vs. H ...
Chennai
Dec-20-1972
Sales Tax
[1973]32STC228(Mad)
K. Venkataswami, First Assistant Government Pleader in T.C. No. 195 of 1968, ;C. Venkataraman, Adv. of ;C. Chandrasekhara Sastry and ;C. Natarajan, Advs. in T.C. No. 411 of 1969 and ;R. Alagar, Adv.
V. Ramaswami, J.1. In T.C. No. 195 of 1968, the Deputy Commissioner, Commercial Taxes, Tiruchirapalli Division, is the petitioner. The respondent is a dealer in paddy, rice and coconuts and doing business in Kumbakonam. For the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Next ›
- Last »