Advanced Search Results

Chekuru Lakshmaiah Vs. Gotti Gundal Venkarami Reddy and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 91 and 92; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100

Reported in : 2005(4)ALD100

Advocate for Appellant : C. Vani Reddy, Adv.

P.S. Narayana, J.1. Heard Smt. C. Vani Reddy, Counsel for the appellant and Sri D. Sethurami Reddy, Counsel for the 1st respondent.2. On 4-8-1997 this Court made the following order:'Admitted on the question whether the finding...

Mane Bandu Gangadhar and Another Vs. Agricultural Scientists Recruitme ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : For the Applicants: Dilip Annasaheb Taur with Amol V. Deshmukh, Advocates. For the Respondents: R1 to R3, Gagan Mathur, R4, Mrs. C. Vani Reddy, R5, B.S. Mor, Advocates.

S.C. Sharma, Acting Chairman: 1. Instant Original Application has been instituted seeking to quash the selection process dated 16.10.2009 and to declare the ARS viva voce conducted on 18.09.2009 as null and void being contrary to...

K.Mallaiah andoth Vs. Sandeep Kumar Sultania and Othe

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Education

THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN AND THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM CONTEMPT CASE No.933 of 2009 17-07-2015 K.Mallaiah and others..Petitioners Sandeep Kumar Sultania and others.Respondents Counsel for the petitioners:Sr.G.Madhusudhan Reddy Counsel for respondents: Sr.G. Narender...

V. Dharma Raju, Ex. Constable/C.i.S.F. Vs. Inspector General (S.W.S.), ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Service

Acts : Central Industrial Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 10, 14 and 14(1); Evidence Act; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226

Reported in : 2009(2)ALT71

Advocate for Appellant : A. Hanumantha Reddy, Adv.

ORDERRamesh Ranganathan, J.1. This writ petition is filed questioning the order of the 2nd respondent dated 05.02.1998, as confirmed by the order of the 1st respondent dated 03.09.1998 and a direction is sought to quash both...

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. P.S.R. Kumar Sinha and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2006(3)ALD57; 2006(2)ALT354

Advocate for Appellant : C. Vani Reddy, Adv.

M.E.N. Patrudu, J.Petitioners:1. Union of India and its officials are the petitioners.2. Respondents2:01. The two respondents in the writ are the retired senior Scientists.2:02. They worked in the Central Government before retirement.3. Facts3:01. The service and...

K. Somasekhar Rao Vs. District Co-operative Officer/Joint Registrar of ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 1964 - Sections 32(7)

Reported in : 2005(2)ALD85; 2005(2)ALT532

Advocate for Appellant : K. Chidambaram, SC, ;Nandigam Krishana Rao, ;I. Maamu Vani, ;S. Satyam Reddy, ;C. Vani Reddy, ;M.S.R. Subrahmanyam, ;V. Manohar Rao, ;Suresh Kumar Reddy Kalava, ;Ancha Panduranga Rao, ;M. Venkata Rama

ORDERB. Prakash Rao, J.1. Since all these writ petitions involved common question of law, they have been taken up together, at the instance of the Counsel appearing on behalf of the parties from both sides.2. Heard...

M. Narayana Vs. Industrial Tribunal-cum-labour Court, Anantapur and An ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Section11-A; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1999(5)ALD574

Advocate for Appellant : Mrs. C. Vani Reddy, Adv.

ORDER1. The petitioner was a conductor in the APSRTC. Consequent on a check on 23-3-1989 while the petitioner was on duty, certain allegations were levelled against the petitioner and he was suspended from service by the...

M.C. Jena Vs. the Commandant, Central Industrial Security Force Unit a ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Service

Acts : Central Industrial Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 61; Evidence Act; Central Industrial Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 29A, 31 and 34; Central Civil Services (Leave) Rules, 1972 - Rules 19(3) and 38; Service Regulations - Regulation 113; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 21 and 226

Reported in : 2008(1)ALD317; 2008(1)ALT733

Advocate for Appellant : Krishnamurthy Devarakonda, Adv.

ORDERG.S. Singhvi, C.J.1. Whether the punishment of removal from service imposed on the petitioner, who was then holding the post of Head Constable/Driver in the Central Industrial Security Force (CISF) and was found guilty of not...