Advanced Search Results

Chairman and M.D. Indian Overseas Bank and ors Vs. Tribhuwan Nath Sriv ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment and order dated September 3, 2003 passed by a division bench of the Allahabad High Court on a writ petition (Civil Miscellaneous Writ Petition No.6162...

Mrs. Sarita S. Melwani, Proprietress, Carrying on Business in the Firm ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Bombay Shops and Establishments Act; Maharastra Recognition Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act; Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 2; Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 25B, 25B(1), 25B(2), 25F, 25FFF and 25G; Payment of Gratuity Act; Minimum Wages Act; Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946; Central Act; Minimum wages Rules - Rule 23(4), 23(5) and 23(6)

Reported in : 2008(4)ALLMR548; 2008(1)BomCR561; [2008(117)FLR791]; 2008(1)MhLj522

Advocate for Appellant : J.P. Cama and ;Pallavi Dedhia, Advs.; C.U. Singh, Adv.

Nishita Mhatre, J.1. Rule. By consent of the parties, Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally.2. The petition challenges the order of the Labour Court in Complaint (ULP) No. 838 of 2000 allowing the complaint filed...

Mahindra and Mahindra Vs. Suryabahn Avhad

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 14A and 44; Evidence Act; Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 11A; Public Law; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2007(4)BomCR118; 2007(6)MhLj436

Advocate for Appellant : C.U. Singh, Sr. Adv., ;R.N. Shah, ;Sanjay Udeshi and ;Mahesh Londhe, Advs., i/b., Sanjay Udeshi & Co.

S.C. Dharmadhikari, J.1. Rule. Respondent waives service. 2. By consent of parties, Rule made returnable forthwith. 3. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged an order dated 2.12.2006...

Mohammod HusseIn Kasau Motiwala Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 20(3) and 226; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 191, 193, 199, 211, 391 and 399; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 395

Reported in : 1995(3)BomCR633; 1995CriLJ2364

Advocate for Appellant : C.U. Singh and;S.R. Panday, Advs.

V.H. Bhairavia, J.1. Having been dissatisfied with the functioning of the Police Department of Greater Bombay, the Petitioner knocked the door of this Court and invoked the extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of...

Shramik Sena a trade union, registered under the Trade Unions Act, 192 ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 3(11), 11, 12, 13, 13(1), 14, 15, 16, 18, 19 and 20; Trade Unions Act, 1926; Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 - Sections 3(25) and 15; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Constitution and Rules - Rules 3 and 5

Reported in : 2006(6)ALLMR708; 2006(5)BomCR616; (2006)IIILLJ628Bom

Advocate for Appellant : C.U. Singh, Adv., i/b., Sanjay Udeshi and Co.

D.B. Bhosale, J.1. This writ petition under article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India impugns the judgment and order dated 3rd March, 1998 rendered by the Industrial Court, Thane granting the Application (MRTU) No....

R.P. Sawant and ors. Vs. Bajaj Auto Ltd. and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1972 - Sections 5, 7, 21(1), 25T, 25U, 26 and 32; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Act, 1982

Reported in : 2002(4)BomCR376; [2001(91)FLR37]; (2001)IILLJ1349Bom; 2002(1)MhLj626

Advocate for Appellant : C.U. Singh, ;S.R. Nargolkar, ;S.B. Bombale Deshmukh, ;Seema Sarnaik and ;P.M.Gore, Advs.

B.N. Srikrishna, J.1. These four Letters Patent Appeals challenge the judgment and order dated 24th December, 1999 delivered by the learned Single Judge (R.J. Kochar, J.) in Writ Petition No. 5536 of 1998 and Writ Petition...

Sanjay R. Kothari and anr. Vs. South Mumbai Consumer Disputes Redressa ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Consumer

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 13(4), (5) and (6); Maharashtra Consumer Protection Rules, 2000 - Rules 4(7), 8(7), 9(1) and (6)

Reported in : AIR2003Bom15; 2002(4)ALLMR617; 2002(6)BomCR637; (2002)4BOMLR760; 2003(1)MhLj804

Advocate for Appellant : Rajani Iyer and ;C.U. Singh, Advs. in W.P. No. 1147 of 2002 i/b., ;Thakore Jariwala & Associates in W.P. No. 1147 of 2002 and ;Hutoxi Tavadia, Adv. in W.P. No. 1425 of 2002;K.K. Singhvi, Senior Ad

D.B. Bhosale, J.1. These two writ petitions involve common issue as to whether parties before the Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum (for short 'Consumer Forum') and Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (for short, 'State Commission') are entitled to...

Bankerai Ambikarai Sharma Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982; Bombay University Act, 1974 - Sections 2(30); Constution of India - Articles 14, 16 and 311

Reported in : 2007(1)ALLMR373; [2007(3)JCR2235]; 2006(6)MhLj873; 2007(3)AIRKarR321(FB)(Bom).

Advocate for Appellant : C.U. Singh, Sr. Counsel and; Smita R. Gaidhani, Adv.

R.M. Lod that tha, J.1. The Division Bench, by the order dated 27th April, 2006, opined that the Writ Petition should be referred to larger Bench. This is what the Division Bench said in its order...

Chanbasappa Dhanappa Konale Vs. High Court of Judicature and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2004(3)ALLMR874; 2004(2)BomCR30; 2004(2)MhLj157

Advocate for Appellant : C.U. Singh and ;Sanjay Udeshi, Advs.

R.M. Lodha, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 2nd November, 1996 passed by the learned Single Judge dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellant challenging the order of compulsory retirement.2. For the...

Mahindra and Mahindra Limited Vs. Dwarkanath Babaji Dalvi and Mahindra ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 44; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2; Constitution of India - Articles 136, 226 and 227

Reported in : 2006(3)BomCR805; [2006(109)FLR747]; (2006)IIILLJ177Bom; 2006(4)MhLj88

Advocate for Appellant : J.P. Cama and ;C.U. Singh, Sr. Counsels, ;R.N. Shah and ;Sanjay Udeshi, Advs., i/b., Sanjay Udeshi and Co.

V.C. Daga, J.1. This petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is directed against the order of the Industrial Court, Mumbai dated 25th October, 2005 dismissing the revision application preferred by the petitioner-...