Advanced Search Results

Chairman and M.D. Indian Overseas Bank and ors Vs. Tribhuwan Nath Sriv ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment and order dated September 3, 2003 passed by a...

Mrs. Sarita S. Melwani, Proprietress, Carrying on Business in the Firm ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Bombay Shops and Establishments Act; Maharastra Recognition Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act; Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 2; Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 25B, 25B(1), 25B(2), 25F, 25FFF and 25G; Payment of Gratuity Act; Minimum Wages Act; Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946; Central Act; Minimum wages Rules - Rule 23(4), 23(5) and 23(6)

Reported in : 2008(4)ALLMR548; 2008(1)BomCR561; [2008(117)FLR791]; 2008(1)MhLj522

Advocate for Appellant : J.P. Cama and ;Pallavi Dedhia, Advs.; C.U. Singh, Adv.

Nishita Mhatre, J.1. Rule. By consent of the parties, Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally.2. The petition challenges the...

Mahindra and Mahindra Vs. Suryabahn Avhad

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 14A and 44; Evidence Act; Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 11A; Public Law; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2007(4)BomCR118; 2007(6)MhLj436

Advocate for Appellant : C.U. Singh, Sr. Adv., ;R.N. Shah, ;Sanjay Udeshi and ;Mahesh Londhe, Advs., i/b., Sanjay Udeshi & Co.

S.C. Dharmadhikari, J.1. Rule. Respondent waives service. 2. By consent of parties, Rule made returnable forthwith. 3. By this petition...

Mohammod HusseIn Kasau Motiwala Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 20(3) and 226; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 191, 193, 199, 211, 391 and 399; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 395

Reported in : 1995(3)BomCR633; 1995CriLJ2364

Advocate for Appellant : C.U. Singh and;S.R. Panday, Advs.

V.H. Bhairavia, J.1. Having been dissatisfied with the functioning of the Police Department of Greater Bombay, the Petitioner knocked the...

Sanjay R. Kothari and anr. Vs. South Mumbai Consumer Disputes Redressa ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Consumer

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 13(4), (5) and (6); Maharashtra Consumer Protection Rules, 2000 - Rules 4(7), 8(7), 9(1) and (6)

Reported in : AIR2003Bom15; 2002(4)ALLMR617; 2002(6)BomCR637; (2002)4BOMLR760; 2003(1)MhLj804

Advocate for Appellant : Rajani Iyer and ;C.U. Singh, Advs. in W.P. No. 1147 of 2002 i/b., ;Thakore Jariwala & Associates in W.P. No. 1147 of 2002 and ;Hutoxi Tavadia, Adv. in W.P. No. 1425 of 2002;K.K. Singhvi, Senior Ad

D.B. Bhosale, J.1. These two writ petitions involve common issue as to whether parties before the Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum...

Mahindra and Mahindra Limited Vs. Dwarkanath Babaji Dalvi and Mahindra ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 44; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2; Constitution of India - Articles 136, 226 and 227

Reported in : 2006(3)BomCR805; [2006(109)FLR747]; (2006)IIILLJ177Bom; 2006(4)MhLj88

Advocate for Appellant : J.P. Cama and ;C.U. Singh, Sr. Counsels, ;R.N. Shah and ;Sanjay Udeshi, Advs., i/b., Sanjay Udeshi and Co.

V.C. Daga, J.1. This petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is directed against the order of...

Shramik Sena a trade union, registered under the Trade Unions Act, 192 ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 3(11), 11, 12, 13, 13(1), 14, 15, 16, 18, 19 and 20; Trade Unions Act, 1926; Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 - Sections 3(25) and 15; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Constitution and Rules - Rules 3 and 5

Reported in : 2006(6)ALLMR708; 2006(5)BomCR616; (2006)IIILLJ628Bom

Advocate for Appellant : C.U. Singh, Adv., i/b., Sanjay Udeshi and Co.

D.B. Bhosale, J.1. This writ petition under article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India impugns the judgment and...

Yeshaswinee Merchant and ors. Vs. Air India Ltd. and ors. Overruled

Court : Mumbai

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Air Corporations Act, 1953 - Sections 34; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16; The Equal Remuneration Act, 1976 - Sections 5

Reported in : 2002(1)MhLj701

Advocate for Appellant : C.U. Singh and ;Geetanjali Prabhu, Advs. i/b., Sanjay Udeshi and Co., ;Anand Grover and ;F. Moosa, Advs. i/b., Halwasia and Co., ;Harish Jagtiyani, Sr. Adv., ;Mohan Bir Singh and ;V.M. Singh, Advs. i/

A.P. Shah, J.1. Whether the air hostesses working in Air India have a right to perform flying duties after attaining...

R.P. Sawant and ors. Vs. Bajaj Auto Ltd. and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1972 - Sections 5, 7, 21(1), 25T, 25U, 26 and 32; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Act, 1982

Reported in : 2002(4)BomCR376; [2001(91)FLR37]; (2001)IILLJ1349Bom; 2002(1)MhLj626

Advocate for Appellant : C.U. Singh, ;S.R. Nargolkar, ;S.B. Bombale Deshmukh, ;Seema Sarnaik and ;P.M.Gore, Advs.

B.N. Srikrishna, J.1. These four Letters Patent Appeals challenge the judgment and order dated 24th December, 1999 delivered by the...

Bankerai Ambikarai Sharma Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982; Bombay University Act, 1974 - Sections 2(30); Constution of India - Articles 14, 16 and 311

Reported in : 2007(1)ALLMR373; [2007(3)JCR2235]; 2006(6)MhLj873; 2007(3)AIRKarR321(FB)(Bom).

Advocate for Appellant : C.U. Singh, Sr. Counsel and; Smita R. Gaidhani, Adv.

R.M. Lod that tha, J.1. The Division Bench, by the order dated 27th April, 2006, opined that the Writ Petition...