Advanced Search Results

Thomas and anr. Vs. Dr. Mathai and anr.

Court : Kerala

Subject : FamilyContract

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 62; Evidence Act - Sections 45; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 151 - Order 8, Rule 9

Reported in : 2009(1)KLJ16

Advocate for Appellant : C.T. Joseph, Adv.

Pius C. Kuriakose, J.1. Defendants 1 and 2 in a suit for partition which was decreed by the court below are the appellants. The first respondent is the plaintiff and the second respondent is the third...

P.T.Mathai Vs. The South Indian Bank Ltd.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR TUESDAY, THE7H DAY OF APRIL201517TH CHAITHRA, 1937 OP (DRT).No. 97 of 2014 (O) ---------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OA5642013 of DEBTS...

Sheela Vs. Puthen Kovil Bhagavathi Temple

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF JULY 2013 9TH SRAVANA, 1935 OP(C).No. 2525 of 2013 (O) --------------------------- AS 50/2013 OF D.C & SESSIONS COURT,...

Chairman, State Bank Of India Vs. M.j.james

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : A. V. RANGAM __ T. G. NARAYANAN NAIR

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.8223 OF2009THE CHAIRMAN, STATE BANK OF INDIA AND ANOTHER ..... APPELLANT(S) VERSUS M.J.JAMES ..... RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT SANJIV KHANNA, J.The Chairman, State Bank of India,...

Subhadra Vs. State of Kerala and ors.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Property

Acts : Kerala Revenue Recovery Act, 1968 - Sections 2, 44, 44(2), 44(3), 50, 68 68(1) and 68(4); Kerala Toddy Workers' Welfare Fund Act, 1969 - Sections 9

Reported in : AIR1995Ker245

Advocate for Appellant : V.J. Joseph and; C.T. Joseph, Advs.

Ramakrishnan, J.1. The question raised in this appeal by the plaintiff in a suit for declaration and injunction is whether the plaint schedule property assigned to her by her late husband can be proceeded against and...

Abraham Vs. Asst. Sales Tax Officer, Alwaye

Court : Kerala

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 2; Constitution of India - Article 366(12)

Reported in : AIR1960Ker360; [1960]11STC291(Ker)

Advocate for Appellant : C.T. Peter,; C.T. Joseph and; T.C. Karunakaran, Advs

ORDERP.T. Raman Nayar, J. 1. There can be no doubt that animals and birds in captivity (monkeys, minahs and parrots, in these cases) are moveable property, and they are therefore 'goods' as that word is defined...

Lissy Lyju and anr. Vs. Tahsildar and ors.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Municipal Tax

Acts : Kerala Building Tax Act, 1975 - Sections 2

Reported in : AIR2001Ker82

Advocate for Appellant : C.T. Joseph,; George C. Menacherry and; Sobha Mathew

Koshy, J. 1. All these original petitions are filed challenging the orders of assessment under the Kerala Building Tax Act, 1975 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act). The buildings in question, though integral ones, portions of...

Shree Shew Sakti Oil Mills Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1983)(14)ELT1790TriDel

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. M.C. Bhandare

1. As common question of law and fact is involved in Appeal Nos. CD (SB) (T) 1/56, 2/56 and 3/56, they will, therefore, be disposed of by this one common judgment.2. M/s. Bharat Marble Company, M/s....

Abilash Rubber Products Vs. Commr. of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Subject : Service Tax

1. All these appeals raise a common question of law and facts and hence they are taken up together for disposal as per law.2. This appeal arises from OIA No. 14/2004-CE dated 30-11-2004. In this case,...

Leo Rubbers Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2006)(104)ECC212

1. The stay application and appeals arise form common OIA No.9/2005-C.E., dated 24-4-2005. The appellants were clearing goods namely tyre flaps to APSRTC on the basis of orders placed by M/s. India Rubber Products. For the...