Advanced Search Results
D. Pataiah Vs. Superintendent of Police, Cuddapah, Cuddapah District a ...
Andhra Pradesh
Sep-07-2001
Service
Constitution of India - Article 309; Andhra Pradesh State and Subordinate Service Rules - Rules 1 and 2; Madras District Police Act, 1859 - Sections 8 and 10; Hyderabad District Police Act, 1329-Fasli - Sections 6; Hyderabad City Police Act, 1348 Fasli- Sections 7
2001(6)ALD70
C. Srinivasa Babu, Adv.
S.B. Sinha, C.J. 1. The petitioner herein was appointed as a Police Constable in 1969. He was promoted as Head Constable in January, 1994. He had undergone the refresher course training, but had not passed the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLife Insurance Corporation of India Vs. Smt. B. Kusua Rai
Karnataka
Aug-23-1988
Company
Insurance Act, 1938 - Sections 45
[1992]75CompCas712(Kar); 1989(1)KarLJ52
C. Srinivasa Iyengar, Adv.
Navadgi, J. 1. This is defendant's appeal against the judgment and decree dated August 31, 1977,made by the First Additional Civil Judge, Mangalore. The Life Insurance Corporation of India, the appellant, and Smt. B. Kusuma T....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskB. Ashok Kumar Vs. Board of Intermediate Education Rep. by Its Vice Ch ...
Andhra Pradesh
Apr-19-2008
Service
2008(4)ALD521; 2008(4)ALT12
C. Srinivasa Baba, Adv.
ORDERL. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. The petitioner was initially employed as L.D.C., in the Board of Intermediate Education, the 1st respondent, in the year 1972. Thereafter, he earned promotions as U.D.C., Office Superintendent, Administrative Officer, and ultimately...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
P.B.B. Narasimha Rao Vs. Environment Protection Training and Search In ...
Andhra Pradesh
Feb-14-2006
Service
Andhra Pradesh Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1991 - Rule 20(5) and 20(6); ;Service Rules
2006(2)ALD705; 2006(3)ALT199; [2006(109)FLR945]
C. Srinivasa Baba, Adv.
L. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. The petitioner was appointed as an Administration and Accounts Officer in the respondents-Institute. He was placed under suspension through orders dated 6-6-2005. This was followed by issuance of charge memo dated 17-6-2005....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Amrik Singh
Punjab and Haryana
Feb-06-2008
Direct Taxation
(2008)219CTR(P& H)65; [2008]299ITR14(P& H)
Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.1. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh, vide order dated April 30, 1984, passed in R.A. No. 141 of 1983, arising out of I.T.A. No. 760 of 1981, for the assessment year 1974-75 has...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income Tax, Bombay Vs. C.U. Shah, Bombay
Supreme Court of India
Feb-01-1995
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Section 256(2)
1995Supp(3)SCC70
J.S. Verma and; K.S. Paripoornan, JJ.1. This appeal by special leave is by the Revenue against rejection by the High Court of its application made under Section 256(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for requiring...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTribhuvan Das G. Patel Vs. Commr. of Income Tax, Bombay
Supreme Court of India
Feb-14-1996
Direct Taxation
[1999]236ITR515(SC); (1998)8SCC509
Mr. Sharma
ORDER1. Heard counsel for the parties.2. The following three questions were stated by the Tribunal for the opinion of the High Court under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961:'1. Whether on the facts and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRajesh Brothers Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Delhi
Aug-16-2001
Direct Taxation
Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 256(1) and 256(2)
[2001]252ITR213(Delhi)
Arijit Pasayat, C.J. 1. Pursuant to the directions given by this court, the following questions have been referred at the instance of the assessed under Section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short 'the Act'),...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCwt Vs. Vasavi Pratap Chand
Delhi
Dec-11-2001
Direct Taxation
(2001)172CTR(Del)190
Sanjiv Khanna,; R. C. Pandey,; Ms. Prem Lata Bansal and
S.B. Sinha, C.J.Interpretation of certain provisions of Wealth Tax Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) is involved in these set of references.The question which has been referred for the opinion of this court is...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askito Vs. A.S. Babu Sah
Chennai
Mar-16-2001
Direct Taxation
[2003]86ITD283(Mad)
G.S.D. Babu, for the Assessee Philip George, for the Revenue
ORDERPer Shri N. Barathvaja Sankar, A.M.As these three appeals by the revenue for the three successive assessment years 1985-86, 1986-87 and 1987-88 in the case of the assessee M/s. A.S. Babu Sah & Others, Kancheepuram against...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »