Advanced Search Results
Chunbidya and Others Vs. Emperor
Privy Council
Dec-06-1934
Criminal
C. Sidney Smith, for Petitioners; W. Wallach, for the Crown. Solicitors for Petitioners, Hy. S.L. Polak and Co.; Solicitors for Respondent, Solicitor India Office.
Lord Atkin: This is an application for special leave to appeal from a judgment of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. The question arose in this way. The petitioners were tried before the Divisional Sessions...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThakur Bhagwan Singh and Others Vs. Bishambar Nath (Minor) and Others
Privy Council
May-02-1940
Land Acquisition
AIR1940PC114
C. Sidney Smith, for Appellants; L.P.E. Pugh and T.B. Wilson Ramsay, for Respondents. Solicitors for Appellants, Douglas Grant and Dold; Solicitors for Respondents, T.L. Wilson and Co.
LORD JUSTICE GODDARD: This is an appeal from a judgment of the High Court of Allahabad dismissing an appeal by the present appellants and allowing an appeal by the first three respondents from a judgment of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTyagaraja Mudaliyar and Another Vs. Vedathanni
Privy Council
Dec-06-1935
Land Acquisition
L. DeGruyther and P.V. Subba Row, for Appellants; A.M. Dunne and C. Sidney Smith, for Respondent. Solicitors for Appellants, Harold Shephard; Solicitors for Respondent, Hy.S.L. Polak and Co.
Sir John Wallis: The plaintiff Vedathanni, widow of the late Ramalinga Mudaliyar, who died without issue on 23rd December 1912, instituted this suit, on 25th July 1925, in the Court of the Subordinate Judge of Negapatam,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Mohammad Ismail and Others Vs. Hanuman Parshad and Another
Privy Council
Oct-20-1938
Land Acquisition
C. Sidney Smith, for Appellants, J. M Parikh, for Respondent No. 1. Solicitors for Appellants, Hy.S. L. Polak and Co. Solicitors for Respondent No.1, T.L. Wilson and Co.
Sir George Lowndes: For the purpose of this judgment the facts may be stated quite shortly. In the main they are not in dispute. One Mahomad Sadiq, the father of the appellants, was (prior to the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM.P.M. Murugappa Chetti and Another Vs. Official Assignee, Madras
Privy Council
Jul-22-1937
Land Acquisition
Sir Herbert Cunliffe, C. Sidney Smith and Mrs. M.J. Clarke, for Appellants; Ronald F. Roxburgh and Berrett, for Respondent. Solicitors for Appellants, Douglas, Grant and Dold; Solicitors for Respondent, Burton, Yeats and Hart.
SIR GEORGE LOWNDES: These consolidated appeals arise out of a petition presented by Murugappa Chetti and his brother Ramaswami Chetti (since deceased and now represented by his widow Minakshi Achi) in certain insolvency proceedings in the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKrishnayya Rao and Another Vs. Venkata Kumara Mahipathi Surya Rao
Privy Council
Jun-28-1935
Land Acquisition
A.M. Dunne and P.V. Subba Row, for Appellants; W.H. Upjohn, L. DeGruyther, C. Sidney Smith and Sambasiva Rao, for Respondent. Solicitors for Appellants, Hy. S.L. Palak and Co.; Solicitors for Respondent, Douglas Grant and Dold.
Sir George Lowndes: This appeal was before the Board in June 1933, when a preliminary point was considered as to the admissibility of certain evidence which had been rejected by the Indian Courts. As the result...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNazir Ahmad Vs. Emperor
Privy Council
Jan-20-1936
Criminal
AIR1936PC253(1)
C. Sidney Smith, for Appellant; W. Wallach, for the Crown. Solicitors for Appellant, H.S.L. Polak and Co.; Solicitor for Respondent, The Solicitor, India Office.
LORD BLANESBURGH: Their Lordships desire to re-affirm in this case the very exceptional circumstances in which alone they will humbly advise His Majesty to grant leave to appeal in a criminal case. They would not have...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMonohar Mukerji Vs. Bhupendra Nath Mukerji and Others
Privy Council
Dec-03-1935
Land Acquisition
AIR1936PC325
A.M. Dunne and Denning, for Appellant; L. DeGruyther and C. Sidney Smith, for Respondents. Solicitors for Appellant, Vallence and Vallence; Solicitors for Respondents, Harold Shephard.
LORD THANKERTON: This is an appeal from the judgment and decree of the High Court of Judicature at Fort William in Bengal, dated 26th April 1928, which set aside a decree of the Subordinate Judge of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask(Sri) Nandamani Ananga Bhima Deo Vs. Sri Suseela Mala Patta Mahadevi
Privy Council
Nov-01-1932
Land Acquisition
A.M. Dunne, K.V.L. Narasimham, and S.P. Khambatto, for Appellants ; L. DeGruyther, C. Sidney Smith, V.V. Jagiah, and C. Sambasiva Rao, for Respondents. Solicitors for Appellant, Hy. S.L. Polak and Co. ; Solicitors for Respondent, Douglas Grant and Dold.
SIR DINSHAH MULLA: This is an appeal from the decree of the High Court of Judicature at Madras dated 30th March 1928, which reversed a decree of the Court of the Additional Subordinate Judge of Berhampore...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRas Behari Lal and Others Vs. Emperor
Privy Council
Jul-27-1933
Right to Information
D.N. Pritt and C. Sidney Smith, for Appellants; A.M. Dunne and W. Wattach, for Opposite Party. Solicitors for Appellants, Hy. S.L. Polak and Co.; Solicitors for Respondent, The Solicitor India Office.
LORD ATKIN: This is appeal by special leave. The appellants were tried by the Sessions Judge of Patna, sitting with a jury of seven. They were found guilty by a majority verdict of six to one...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »